Interorganisational and interprofessional partnership approaches to achieve more coordinated and integrated primary and community health services: the Australian experience
Julie McDonald A B , Gawaine Powell Davies A and Mark Fort Harris AA Research Centre for Primary Health Care and Equity, School of Public Health and Community Medicine, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW 2052, Australia.
B Corresponding author. Email: j.mcdonald@unsw.edu.au
Australian Journal of Primary Health 15(4) 262-269 https://doi.org/10.1071/PY09017
Published: 26 November 2009
Abstract
Improving collaboration and coordination in primary and community health is a national priority. Two major approaches have been taken: strengthening interorganisational and interprofessional collaboration. This paper reviews current and emerging models of partnerships: divisions of general practice and primary care partnerships (organisational models); and collaboration between general practitioners with practice nurses and with allied health professionals (interprofessional models). The models are reviewed in terms of the governance and formalisation of the partnership arrangements and the level of collaboration they achieve. The organisational models have had different purposes and taken different forms, the ‘hub and spoke’ model of divisions and decentralised ‘network’ relationships of primary care partnerships, both of which have broadly achieved their aims. Interprofessional collaboration involves a complex mix of allegiances and interests that influences the level of collaboration that is achieved. A combination of approaches is needed to achieve more coordinated and integrated primary health care. The implications for several current policy debates are discussed: the establishment of local integrated and comprehensive primary health care centres, regional level primary care organisations and alternative payment mechanisms.
D’Amour D,
Ferrada-Videla M,
San Martin-Rodriguez L, Beaulieu MD
(2005) The conceptual basis for interprofessional collaboration: core concepts and theoretical frameworks. Journal of Interprofessional Care 19(Suppl. 1), 116–131.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | PubMed |
[Verified 7 January 2009]
Dickinson H
(2006) The evaluation of health and social care partnerships: an analysis of approaches and synthesis for the future. Health & Social Care in the Community 14(5), 375–383.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | PubMed |
[Verified 4 February 2009]
Rogers WA, Veale B
(2000) Dollars, debts and duties: lessons from funding Australian general practice. Health & Social Care in the Community 8(5), 291–297.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | PubMed |
Schoen C,
Osborn R,
How SKH,
Doty MM, Peugh J
(2009) In chronic condition: experiences of patients with complex health care needs, in eight countries, 2008. Health Affairs 28, w1–w16.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | PubMed |
Scott IA
(2007) Pay for performance in health care: strategic issues for Australian experiments. The Medical Journal of Australia 187(1), 31–35.
| PubMed |
Sheehan D,
Robertson L, Ormond T
(2007) Comparison of language used and patterns of communication in interprofessional and multidisciplinary teams. Journal of Interprofessional Care 21(1), 17–30.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | PubMed |
CAS |
Shortus TD,
McKenzie SH,
Kemp LA,
Proudfoot JG, Harris MF
(2007) Multidisciplinary care plans for diabetes: how are they used? The Medical Journal of Australia 187, 78–81.
| PubMed |
Sicotte C,
D’Amour D, Moreault M-P
(2002) Interdisciplinary collaboration within Quebec Community Health Care Centres. Social Science & Medicine 55(6), 991–1003.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Vagholkar S,
Hermiz O,
Zwar NA,
Shortus T,
Comino EJ, Harris M
(2007) Multidisciplinary care plans for diabetic patients: what do they contain? Australian Family Physician 36(4), 279–282.
| PubMed |
Wagner EH
(2000) The role of patient care teams in chronic disease management. BMJ 320, 569–572.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | PubMed |
CAS |
Wensing M,
Wollersheim H, Grol R
(2006) Organizational interventions to implement improvements in patient care: a structured review of reviews. Implementation Science; IS 1, 2.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | PubMed |
Zwar NA,
Hermiz O,
Comino EJ,
Shortus T,
Burns J, Harris M
(2007) Do multidisciplinary care plans result in better care for type 2 diabetes? Australian Family Physician 36, 85–89.
| PubMed |
Zwar NA,
Hasan I, Hermiz O
(2008) Multidisciplinary care plans and diabetes. Benefits for patients with poor glycaemic control. Australian Family Physician 37(11), 960–962.
| PubMed |