Free Standard AU & NZ Shipping For All Book Orders Over $80!
Register      Login
Pacific Conservation Biology Pacific Conservation Biology Society
A journal dedicated to conservation and wildlife management in the Pacific region.
RESEARCH ARTICLE

The multiple faces of sustainability – from sustained yield to sustainable development

Sue Briggs
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations

Institute for Applied Ecology, University of Canberra, Locked Bag 1, ACT 2601, Australia. Email: sue.briggs@canberra.edu.au

Pacific Conservation Biology 23(2) 133-138 https://doi.org/10.1071/PC16034
Submitted: 29 August 2016  Accepted: 5 February 2017   Published: 10 March 2017

Abstract

Sustained yield is the amount or number of a resource that can be harvested without sending the resource into a decline. Sustainable development is development that meets the current needs of human society without compromising the ability of future generations to meet their needs. Sustained yield and sustainable development both encompass concepts of sustainability. This paper (1) describes the concepts of sustained yield and sustainable development, and (2) explores the linkages, or lack of linkages, between the two concepts of sustainability. The linkages between sustained yield and sustainable development are weak. The paper finishes by drawing some conclusions about the relationship, or lack thereof, between sustained yield and sustainable development, and posits that sustainable development should focus on sustainable management and use of natural resources, with socioeconomic issues such as poverty alleviation, women’s rights, displaced people, and trade liberalisation having their own statements or declarations.

Additional keywords: 2030 Agenda, Brundtland, triple bottom line.


References

Alberstadt, R. (2014). Has the status of “maximum sustained yield” become an international customary rule? Beijing Law Review 05, 264–271.
Has the status of “maximum sustained yield” become an international customary rule?Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Australian Government (1992). National strategy for ecologically sustainable development. Australian Government, Canberra. Available at: http://www.environment.gov.au/about-us/esd/publications/national-esd-strategy [accessed 10 January 2017].

Banerjee, S. B. (2003). Who sustains whose development? Sustainable development and the reintroduction of nature. Organization Studies 24, 143–180.
Who sustains whose development? Sustainable development and the reintroduction of nature.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Brown, B. J., Hanson, M. E., Liverman, D. M., and Merideth, R. W. (1987). Global sustainability: toward definition. Environmental Management 11, 713–719.
Global sustainability: toward definition.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Callicott, J. B., and Mumford, K. (1997). Ecological sustainability as a conservation concept. Conservation Biology 11, 32–40.
Ecological sustainability as a conservation concept.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Caughley, G. (1977). ‘Analysis of Vertebrate Populations.’ (Wiley: Brisbane.)

Caughley, G. (1979). What is this thing called carrying capacity? In ‘North American Elk: Ecology, Behavior and Management’. (Eds M. S. Boyce and L. D. Hayden.) pp. 2–8. (University of Wyoming: Laramie, WY.)

Connelly, S. (2007). Mapping sustainable development as a contested concept. Local Environment: The International Journal of Justice and Sustainability 12, 259–278.
Mapping sustainable development as a contested concept.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Ehrlich, P. R., and Levin, S. A. (2005). The evolution of norms. PLoS Biology 3, e194.
The evolution of norms.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Elbakidze, M., Andersson, K., Angelstam, P., Armstrong, G. W., Axelsson, R., Doyon, F., Hermansson, M., Jacobsson, J., and Pautov, Y. (2013). Sustained yield forestry in Sweden and Russia: how does it correspond to sustainable forest management policy? Ambio 42, 160–173.
Sustained yield forestry in Sweden and Russia: how does it correspond to sustainable forest management policy?Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Finley, C., and Oreskes, N. (2013). Maximum sustained yield: a policy disguised as science. ICES Journal of Marine Science 70, 245–250.
Maximum sustained yield: a policy disguised as science.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Goodland, R. (1995). The concept of environmental sustainability. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 26, 1–24.
The concept of environmental sustainability.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Grober, U. (2007). Deep roots: a conceptual history of “sustainable development” (Nachhaltigkeit). Wissenschaftszentrum Berlin für Sozialforschung,WZB Discussion Paper P 2007-002, Berlin.

Hartig, G.-L. (1795). ‘Anweisung zur Taxation der Forste oder zur Bestimmung des Holzertrags der Wälder.’ (Hartig: Giessen.)

Hjort, J., Jahn, G., and Ottestad, P. (1933). The optimum catch. Hvalrådets Skrifter 7, 92–127.

Holt, S. J. (2014). The graceful sigmoid: Johan Hjort’s contribution to the theory of rational fishing. ICES Journal of Marine Science 71, 2008–2011.
The graceful sigmoid: Johan Hjort’s contribution to the theory of rational fishing.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Huston, M. (1979). A general hypothesis of species diversity. American Naturalist 113, 81–101.
A general hypothesis of species diversity.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Jacobs, M. (2003). Sustainable development as a contested concept. In ‘Fairness and Futurity: Essays on Environmental Sustainability and Social Justice’. (Ed. M. Dobson.) Oxford Scholarship Online, Oxford. Available at: http://www.oxfordscholarship.com/view/10.1093/0198294891.001.0001/acprof-9780198294894-chapter-2 [accessed 11 Januaruy 2017).

Kates, R. W., Parris, T. M., and Leiserowitz, A. A. (2005). What is sustainable development? Environment: Science and Policy for Sustainable Development 47, 8–21.

Katz, S. L., Zabel, R. W., Harvey, C. J., Good, T. P., and Levin, P. S. (2003). Ecologically sustainable yield. American Scientist 91, 150–157.
Ecologically sustainable yield.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Larkin, P. A. (1977). An epitaph for the concept of maximum sustained yield. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 106, 1–11.
An epitaph for the concept of maximum sustained yield.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Lederwasch, A., and Mukheibir, P. (2013). The triple bottom line and progress towards ecologically sustainable development: Australia’s coal mining industry as a case study. Resources 2, 26–38.
The triple bottom line and progress towards ecologically sustainable development: Australia’s coal mining industry as a case study.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Lowrance, R., Hendrix, P. F., and Odum, E. P. (1986). A hierarchical approach to sustainable agriculture. American Journal of Alternative Agriculture 1, 169–173.
A hierarchical approach to sustainable agriculture.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

McCloskey, M. (1998–1999). The emperor has no clothes: the conundrum of sustainable development. Duke Environmental Law and Policy 9, 153–159.

McLeod, S. R. (1997). Is the concept of carrying capacity useful in variable environments? Oikos 79, 529–542.
Is the concept of carrying capacity useful in variable environments?Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Odum, E. P. (1971). ‘Fundamentals of Ecology.’ (Saunders: Philadelphia.)

Pearson, L. J., Biggs, R., Harris, M., and Walker, B. (2013). Measuring sustainable development: the promise and difficulties of implementing Inclusive Wealth in the Goulburn–Broken Catchment, Victoria, Australia. Sustainability: Science, Practice, and Policy 9, 16–27.

Robinson, J. T. (1993). The limits to caring: sustainable living and the loss of biodiversity. Conservation Biology 7, 20–28.
The limits to caring: sustainable living and the loss of biodiversity.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Roedel, P. M. (1975). A summary and critique of the Symposium on Optimal Yield. In ‘Optimum Sustained Yield as a Concept in Fisheries Management’. pp. 79–89. American Fisheries Society, Special Publication 9, Washington.

Rosenberg, A. A., Fogarty, M. J., Sissenwine, M. P., Beddington, J. R., and Shepherd, J. G. (1993). Achieving sustainable use of natural resources. Science 262, 828–829.
Achieving sustainable use of natural resources.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:STN:280:DC%2BC3cvisFyhsQ%3D%3D&md5=8d84540ef51f4520f6b1b6f79726338fCAS |

Sayre, N. F. (2008). The genesis, history, and limits of carrying capacity. Annals of the Association of American Geographers 98, 120–134.
The genesis, history, and limits of carrying capacity.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Schmithüsen, F. (2013). Three hundred years of applied sustainability in forestry. Unasylva 240, 3–11.

Shelton, P. A., and Morgan, M. J. (2014). Impact of maximum sustained yield-based fisheries management on rebuilding North Atlantic fish stocks. Journal of Northwest Atlantic Fishery Science 46, 15–25.
Impact of maximum sustained yield-based fisheries management on rebuilding North Atlantic fish stocks.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Sinclair, A. R. E., Fryxell, J. M., and Caughley, G. (2006). ‘Wildlife Ecology, Conservation, and Management.’ (Blackwell: Oxford.)

Slaper, T. F., and Hall, T. J. (2011). The triple bottom line: What is it and how does it work? Indiana Business Review 86, 4–8.

United Nations (1992a). Rio Declaration on Environment and Development 1992. United Nations, Geneva. Available at: http://www.jus.uio.no/lm/environmental.development.rio.declaration.1992/portrait.a4.pdf [accessed 29 August 2016].

United Nations (1992b). Agenda 21. United Nations, Geneva. Available at: https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/content/documents/Agenda21.pdf [accessed 29 August 2016].

United Nations (1993). Convention on Biological Diversity. United Nations, Geneva. Available at: https://www.cbd.int/doc/legal/cbd-en.pdf [accessed 29 August 2016]

United Nations (2000). The Millenium Development Goals. United Nations, Geneva. Available at: http://www.unmillenniumproject.org/goals/ [accessed 29 August 2016].

United Nations (2002). Johannesburg Declaration on Sustainable Development. United Nations, Geneva. Available at: http://www.un-documents.net/jburgdec.htm [accessed 29 August 2016].

United Nations (2015). Transforming our world: The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development. United Nations, Geneva. Available at: https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/content/documents/21252030%20Agenda%20for%20Sustainable%20Development%20web.pdf [accessed 29 August 2016].

United Nations (2016). Final list of proposed sustainable development goal indicators. United Nations, Geneva. Available at: http://unstats.un.org/sdgs/indicators/indicators-list/ [accessed 10 January 2017].

United Nations (Undated). Commission on Sustainable Development: Sustainable Development Knowledge Platform. United Nations, Geneva. Available at: https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/csd.html [accessed 29 August 2016].

United States Congress (1960). Multiple-Use Sustained-Yield Act of 1960. United States Congress, Washington D.C. https://www.fs.fed.us/emc/nfma/includes/musya60.pdf (accessed 10 January 2017).

von Carlowitz, H. C. (1713). ‘Sylvicultura Oeconomica – Anweisung zur Wilden Baum-Zucht.’ Reprint 2000. (Johann Friedrich Braun: Leipzig, Freiberg.)

von Humboldt, A. (1959). ‘Über den Zustand des Bergbaus und Hütten-Wesens in den Fürstentümern Bayreuth und Ansbach im Jahre 1792.’ (Academie-Verlag: Berlin.)

Whiteley, S. B. (1999). Calculating the sustainable yield of Tasmania’s State Forests. Tasforests 11, 23–34.

World Commission on Environment and Development (1987). Our common future. Oxford University Press, Oxford. Available at: http://www.un-documents.net/our-common-future.pdf [accessed 29 August 2016].