Still no enthusiasm for anonymous or pseudonymous publication

References

Antonijević, S., and Gurak, L. (2019). The internet: A brief history based on trust. Sociologija 61, 464–477.
| The internet: A brief history based on trust.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Baker, R. (2014). Against anonymity. Bioethics 28, 166–169.
| Against anonymity.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

CASRAI (2020). CRediT – Contributor roles taxonomy. Available at https://casrai.org/credit/ [Accessed 8 September 2021].

COPE (1997). Can a scientific paper be published anonymously? Case number: 97-01. Available at https://publicationethics.org/case/can-scientific-paper-be-published-anonymously [Accessed 7 September 2021].

COPE (2012). Anonymity versus author transparency. Case number: 12–17. Available at https://publicationethics.org/case/anonymity-versus-author-transparency [Accessed 7 September 2021].

Driscoll, D. A., Garrard, G. E., Kusmanoff, A. M., Dovers, S., Maron, M., Preece, N., Pressey, R. L., and Ritchie, E. G. (2021). Consequences of information suppression in ecological and conservation sciences. Conservation Letters 14, e12757.

Gilley, B. (2017). The case for colonialism. Third World Quarterly , 1–17.
| The case for colonialism.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Letnic, M. (2000). The politics of science and conservation: Why not anonymous publication? Biodiversity and Conservation 9, 707–709.
| The politics of science and conservation: Why not anonymous publication?Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

MacRoberts, M. H., and MacRoberts, B. R. (2018). The mismeasure of science: Citation analysis. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology 69, 474–482.
| The mismeasure of science: Citation analysis.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Martin, B. (2019). Preparing for advocacy, resisting attack. Pacific Conservation Biology 25, 105–110.
| Preparing for advocacy, resisting attack.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Minerva, F. (2014a). New threats to academic freedom. Bioethics 28, 157–162.
| New threats to academic freedom.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Minerva, F. (2014b). Why publishing pseudonymously can protect academic freedom. Bioethics 28, 178–180.
| Why publishing pseudonymously can protect academic freedom.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Pacchioni, G. (2018). ‘The overproduction of truth: Passion, competition and integrity in modern science.’ (Oxford University Press: Oxford.)

Thérèse, S., and Martin, B. (2014). Resist, scientist! Countering degradation rituals in science. Prometheus 32, 203–220.
| Resist, scientist! Countering degradation rituals in science.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Tooley, M. (2014). Solutions to the new threats to academic freedom? Bioethics 28, 163–165.
| Solutions to the new threats to academic freedom?Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |