Exploitative competition between desert kit foxes and coyotes in the Mojave Desert
Erica C. Kelly
A C , Brian L. Cypher A and David J. Germano B
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations
A Endangered Species Recovery Program, California State University, Stanislaus, One University Circle, Turlock, CA 95382, USA.
B Department of Biology, California State University, Bakersfield, CA 93309, USA.
C Corresponding author. Email: ekelly@esrp.csustan.edu
Pacific Conservation Biology 26(1) 57-66 https://doi.org/10.1071/PC19007
Submitted: 19 February 2019 Accepted: 26 April 2019 Published: 8 July 2019
Abstract
Exploitative competition between two sympatric guild members can influence the composition and dynamics of an ecological community. We assessed potential exploitative competition between desert kit foxes (Vulpes macrotis arsipus) and coyotes (Canis latrans) by comparing food habits of the two species from 2009 to 2014 on a study site in the Mojave Desert in California. Desert kit foxes specialised on heteromyid rodents and invertebrates, while the most frequently occurring items consumed by coyotes were lagomorphs and rodents. Both species consumed a variety of food items throughout the study, but relative use of these items varied with year and season. Also, precipitation affected prey abundance, and this influenced prey consumption by the two species. The diets of desert kit foxes and coyotes overlapped extensively, which indicated possible exploitative competition. Desert kit foxes consistently had lower dietary diversity than coyotes, indicating that desert kit foxes are more specialist consumers while coyotes are more generalists. Dietary specialisation by kit foxes on smaller items may help reduce competition with coyotes and facilitate coexistence. Coyotes consumed anthropogenic material at much higher frequencies than desert kit foxes, and this subsidisation could increase competitive pressures on kit foxes if it results in greater coyote abundance. Desert kit foxes in California are not a protected species although formal protection has been proposed due to increasing human encroachment. Conservation strategies should include measures to maintain an abundance and diversity of natural food items and limit anthropogenic subsidisation of coyotes.
Additional keywords: drought, optimal foraging theory, prey availability, resource partitioning.
References
Adorjan, A. S., and Kolenosky, G. B. (1969). ‘A Manual for the Identification of Hairs of Selected Ontario Mammals.’ (Ontario Department of Lands and Forests: Ontario.)Arjo, W. M., Gese, E. M., Bennett, T. J., and Kozlowski, A. J. (2007). Changes in kit fox–coyote–prey relationships in the Great Basin Desert, Utah. Western North American Naturalist 67, 389–401.
| Changes in kit fox–coyote–prey relationships in the Great Basin Desert, Utah.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Bekoff, M., and Gese, E. M. (2003). Coyotes. In ‘Wild Mammals of North America: Biology, Management, and Conservation’. (Eds G. A. Feldhamer, B. C. Thompson, and J. A. Chapman.) pp. 467–481. (The Johns Hopkins University Press: Baltimore, MD.)
Bachelet, D., Ferschweiler, K., Sheehan, T., and Strittholt, J. (2016). Climate change effects on southern California deserts. Journal of Arid Environments 127, 17–29.
| Climate change effects on southern California deserts.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Brower, J. E., and Zar, J. H. (1984). ‘Field and Laboratory Methods for General Ecology.’ (Wm. C. Brown Publishers: Dubuque, IA.)
Clifford, D. L., Woods, L., Gabriel, M. W., Rudd, J., Dubovi, E., Terio, K., Uzal, F., Nyaoke, A., De La Mora, A., Diab, S., Massar, M. T., Cypher, B., Darden, T. B., Rodriguez, M., and Gonzales, A. (2013). Canine distemper outbreak in free-ranging desert kit foxes inhabiting a solar energy development zone. In ‘Western Section of the Wildlife Society 2013 Annual Conference, Reno, NV’. Abstract. (Western Section of the Wildlife Society: Albany, CA.)
Corbett, L. (1995). ‘The Dingo.’ (Cornell University Press: Ithaca, NY.)
Cupples, J. B., Crowther, M. S., Story, G., and Letnic, M. (2011). Dietary overlap and prey selectivity among sympatric carnivores: could dingoes suppress foxes through competition for prey? Journal of Mammalogy 92, 590–600.
| Dietary overlap and prey selectivity among sympatric carnivores: could dingoes suppress foxes through competition for prey?Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Cypher, B. L. (1993). Food item use by three sympatric canids in southern Illinois. Transactions of the Illinois State Academy of Science. Illinois State Academy of Science 86, 139–144.
Cypher, B. L. (2003). Foxes (Vulpes species, Urocyon species, and Alopex lagopus). In ‘Wild Mammals of North America: Biology, Management, and Conservation’. (Eds G. A. Feldhamer, B. C. Thompson, and J. A. Chapman.) pp. 511–546. (The Johns Hopkins University Press: Baltimore, MD.)
Cypher, B. L., and Spencer, K. A. (1998). Competitive interactions between coyotes and San Joaquin kit foxes. Journal of Mammalogy 79, 204–214.
| Competitive interactions between coyotes and San Joaquin kit foxes.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Cypher, B. L., Spencer, K. A., and Scrivner, J. H. (1994). Food-item use by coyotes at the Naval Petroleum Reserves in California. The Southwestern Naturalist 39, 91–95.
| Food-item use by coyotes at the Naval Petroleum Reserves in California.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Cypher, B. L., Warrick, G. D., Otten, M. R. M., O’Farrell, T. P., Berry, W. H., Harris, C. E., Kato, T. T., McCue, P. M., Scrivner, J. H., and Zoellick, B. W. (2000). Population dynamics of San Joaquin kit foxes at the Naval Petroleum Reserves in California. Wildlife Monographs 45, 1–43.
Cypher, B. L., Phillips, S. E., and Kelly, P. A. (2013). Quantity and distribution of suitable habitat for endangered San Joaquin kit foxes: conservation implications. Canid Biology and Conservation 16, 25–31.
Cypher, B. L., Fiehler, C. M., Westall, T. L., Van Horn Job, C. L., and Kelly, E. C. (2014). San Joaquin kit fox conservation in the northern Carrizo Plain: baseline demographic and ecological attributes. California State University – Stanislaus, Endangered Species Recovery Program, Turlock, CA.
Cypher, B. L., Kelly, E. C., Westall, T. L., and Van Horn Job, C. L. (2018a). Coyote diet patterns in the Mojave Desert: implications for threatened desert tortoises. Pacific Conservation Biology 24, 44–54.
| Coyote diet patterns in the Mojave Desert: implications for threatened desert tortoises.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Cypher, B. L., Westall, T. L., Spencer, K. E., Meade, D. E., Kelly, E. C., Dart, J., and Van Horn Job, C. L. (2018b). Response of San Joaquin kit foxes to the Topaz Solar Farm: implications for conservation of kit foxes. California State University – Stanislaus, Endangered Species Recovery Program, Turlock, CA.
Di Stefano, J. (2003). How much power is enough? Against the development of an arbitrary convention for statistical power calculations. Functional Ecology 17, 707–709.
| How much power is enough? Against the development of an arbitrary convention for statistical power calculations.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Donadio, E., and Buskirk, S. W. (2006). Diet, morphology, and interspecific killing in Carnivora. American Naturalist 167, 524–536.
| Diet, morphology, and interspecific killing in Carnivora.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 16670995PubMed |
Egoscue, H. J. (1962). Ecology and life history of the kit fox in Tooele County, Utah. Ecology 43, 481–497.
| Ecology and life history of the kit fox in Tooele County, Utah.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Errington, P. L. (1937). Food habits of Iowa red foxes during a drought summer. Ecology 18, 53–61.
| Food habits of Iowa red foxes during a drought summer.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Esque, T. C., Nussear, K. E., Drake, K. K., Walde, A. D., Berry, K. H., Averill-Murray, R. C., Woodman, A. P., Boarman, W. I., Medica, P. A., Mack, J., and Heaton, J. S. (2010). Effects of subsidized predators, resource variability, and human population density on desert tortoise populations in the Mojave Desert, USA. Endangered Species Research 12, 167–177.
| Effects of subsidized predators, resource variability, and human population density on desert tortoise populations in the Mojave Desert, USA.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Ferrel, C. M., Leach, H. R., and Tillotson, D. R. (1953). Food habits of the coyote in California. California Fish and Game 39, 301–341.
Fisher, J. L. (1981). Kit fox diet in south-central Arizona. M.Sc. Thesis, The University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ.
Gause, G. F. (1934). ‘The Struggle for Existence.’ (Williams and Wilkins: Baltimore, MD.)
Glass, B. P. (1981). ‘Key to the Skulls of North American Mammals.’ (Oklahoma State University: Stillwater, OK.)
Grinnell, J., Dixon, D. S., and Linsdale, J. M. (1937). ‘Fur-bearing Mammals of California.’ Vol. 2. (University of California Press: Berkeley, CA.)
Hardin, G. (1960). The competitive exclusion principle. Science 131, 1292–1297.
| The competitive exclusion principle.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 14399717PubMed |
Hockman, J. G., and Chapman, J. A. (1983). Comparative feeding habits of red foxes (Vulpes vulpes) and gray foxes (Urocyon cinereoargenteus) in Maryland. American Midland Naturalist 110, 276–285.
| Comparative feeding habits of red foxes (Vulpes vulpes) and gray foxes (Urocyon cinereoargenteus) in Maryland.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Holt, R. D., and Polis, G. A. (1997). A theoretical framework for intraguild predation. American Naturalist 149, 745–764.
| A theoretical framework for intraguild predation.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Horn, H. S. (1966). Measurement of “overlap” in comparative ecological studies. American Naturalist 100, 419–424.
| Measurement of “overlap” in comparative ecological studies.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Kelly, E. C. (2017). Desert kit fox (Vulpes macrotis arsipus) food habits and competitive interactions with coyotes (Canis latrans) in the Mojave Desert. M.Sc. Thesis, California State University, Bakersfield, CA.
Kelly, E. C., Cypher, B. L., and Germano, D. J. (2019). Temporal variation in foraging patterns of desert kit foxes (Vulpes macrotis arsipus) in the Mojave Desert, California, USA. Journal of Arid Environments 167, 1–7.
| Temporal variation in foraging patterns of desert kit foxes (Vulpes macrotis arsipus) in the Mojave Desert, California, USA.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Koopman, M. E., Scrivner, J. H., and Kato, T. T. (1998). Patterns of den use by San Joaquin kit foxes. Journal of Wildlife Management 62, 373–379.
| Patterns of den use by San Joaquin kit foxes.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Koopman, M. E., Cypher, B. L., and McCullough, D. R. (2001). Factors influencing space and prey use by San Joaquin kit foxes. Transactions of the Western Section of the Wildlife Society 37, 77–83.
Kozlowski, A. J., Gese, E. M., and Arjo, W. M. (2008). Niche overlap and resource partitioning between sympatric kit foxes and coyotes in the Great Basin Desert of western Utah. American Midland Naturalist 160, 191–208.
| Niche overlap and resource partitioning between sympatric kit foxes and coyotes in the Great Basin Desert of western Utah.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Laughrin, L. L. (1970). San Joaquin kit fox, its distribution and abundance. California Department of Fish and Game, Wildlife Management Branch Administrative Report 70-2, Sacramento, CA.
Legendre, P., and Legendre, L. (1998). ‘Numerical Ecology.’ 2nd edn. (Elsevier: Amsterdam.)
Leitner, P. (2009). The promise and peril of solar power. Wildlife Professional 3, 48–53.
Lotka, A. J. (1925). ‘Elements of Physical Biology.’ (Williams and Wilkins: Baltimore, MD.)
Lovich, J. E., and Ennen, J. R. (2011). Wildlife conservation and solar energy development in the desert southwest, United States. Bioscience 61, 982–992.
| Wildlife conservation and solar energy development in the desert southwest, United States.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
MacCracken, J. G., and Hansen, R. M. (1987). Coyote feeding strategies in southeastern Idaho: optimal foraging by an opportunistic predator. Journal of Wildlife Management 51, 278–285.
| Coyote feeding strategies in southeastern Idaho: optimal foraging by an opportunistic predator.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Major, J. T., and Sherburne, J. A. (1987). Interspecific relationships of coyotes, bobcats, and red foxes in western Maine. Journal of Wildlife Management 51, 606–616.
| Interspecific relationships of coyotes, bobcats, and red foxes in western Maine.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Maurer, B. A. (1984). Interference and exploitation in bird communities. The Wilson Bulletin 96, 380–395.
McVey, J. M., Cobb, D. T., Powell, R. A., Stoskopf, M. K., Bohling, J. H., Waits, L. P., and Moorman, C. E. (2013). Diets of sympatric red wolves and coyotes in northeastern North Carolina. Journal of Mammalogy 94, 1141–1148.
| Diets of sympatric red wolves and coyotes in northeastern North Carolina.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Moehrenschlager, A., Cypher, B. L., Ralls, K., List, R., and Sovada, M. A. (2004). Swift foxes and kit foxes: comparative ecology and conservation priorities of swift and kit foxes. In ‘The Biology and Conservation of Wild Canids’. (Eds D. W. Macdonald, and C. Sillero-Zubiri.) pp. 185–198. (Oxford University Press: Oxford.)
Moore, T. D., Spencer, L. E., and Dugnolle, C. E. (1974). Identification of the dorsal guard hairs of some mammals of Wyoming. Wyoming Game and Fish Department Bulletin 14, 1–177.
Morrell, S. (1972). Life history of the San Joaquin kit fox. California Fish and Game 58, 162–174.
Neale, J. C. C., and Sacks, B. N. (2001). Food habits and space use of gray foxes in relation to sympatric coyotes and bobcats. Canadian Journal of Zoology 79, 1794–1800.
| Food habits and space use of gray foxes in relation to sympatric coyotes and bobcats.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Nelson, J. L., Cypher, B. L., Bjurlin, C. D., and Creel, S. (2007). Effects of habitat on competition between kit foxes and coyotes. Journal of Wildlife Management 71, 1467–1475.
| Effects of habitat on competition between kit foxes and coyotes.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Newsome, T. M., and van Eeden, L. M. (2017). The effects of food waste on wildlife and humans. Sustainability 9, 1269.
| The effects of food waste on wildlife and humans.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Noy-Meir, I. (1973). Desert ecosystems: environments and producers. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 4, 25–51.
| Desert ecosystems: environments and producers.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Paltridge, R. (2002). The diets of cats, foxes and dingoes in relation to prey availability in the Tanami Desert, Northern Territory. Wildlife Research 29, 389–403.
| The diets of cats, foxes and dingoes in relation to prey availability in the Tanami Desert, Northern Territory.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Pianka, E. R. (1978). ‘Evolutionary Ecology.’ 2nd edn. (Harper and Row Publishers: New York.)
Pyke, G. H., Pulliam, H. R., and Charnov, E. L. (1977). Optimal foraging: a selective review of theory and tests. The Quarterly Review of Biology 52, 137–154.
| Optimal foraging: a selective review of theory and tests.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Rodewald, A. D., Kearns, L. J., and Shustack, D. P. (2011). Anthropogenic resource subsidies decouple predator-prey relationships. Ecological Applications 21, 936–943.
| Anthropogenic resource subsidies decouple predator-prey relationships.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 21639056PubMed |
Roest, A. I. (1986). ‘A Key-guide to Mammal Skulls and Lower Jaws.’ (Mad River Press: Eureka, CA.)
Scherer, R. D., and Tracey, J. A. (2011). A power analysis for the use of counts of egg masses to monitor wood frog (Lithobates sylvaticus) populations. Herpetological Conservation and Biology 6, 81–90.
Schoener, T. W. (1974). Resource partitioning in ecological communities. Science 185, 27–39.
| Resource partitioning in ecological communities.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 17779277PubMed |
Sheldon, J. W. (1992). ‘Wild Dogs: The Natural History of the Nondomestic Canidae.’ (Academic Press: San Diego, CA.)
Smith, N. S., and Danner, D. A. (1990). Gray fox diets relative to presence of coyotes and cattle grazing. In ‘Managing Wildlife in the Southwest Symposium’. (Eds P. R. Krausman, and N. S. Smith.) pp. 144–150. (Arizona Chapter of The Wildlife Society: Phoenix, AZ.)
Spencer, E. E., Newsome, T. M., and Dickman, C. R. (2017). Prey selection and dietary flexibility of three species of mammalian predator during an irruption of non-cyclic prey. Royal Society Open Science 4, 170317.
| Prey selection and dietary flexibility of three species of mammalian predator during an irruption of non-cyclic prey.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 28989739PubMed |
Spiegel, L., Cypher, B. L., and Dao, T. C. (1996). Diet of the San Joaquin kit fox (Vulpes macrotis mutica) at three sites in western Kern County, California. In ‘Studies of San Joaquin kit fox in Undeveloped and Oil Developed Areas’. (Ed. L. Spiegel.) pp. 39–52. (California Energy Commission: Sacramento, CA.)
Stephens, D. W., and Krebs, J. R. (1986). ‘Foraging Theory.’ (Princeton University Press: Princeton, NJ.)
Taylor, B. L., and Gerrodette, T. (1993). The uses of statistical power in conservation biology: the vaquita and northern spotted owl. Conservation Biology 7, 489–500.
| The uses of statistical power in conservation biology: the vaquita and northern spotted owl.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Theberge, J. B., and Wedeles, C. H. R. (1989). Prey selection and habitat partitioning in sympatric coyote and red fox populations, southwest Yukon. Canadian Journal of Zoology 67, 1285–1290.
| Prey selection and habitat partitioning in sympatric coyote and red fox populations, southwest Yukon.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Turner, R. M. (1994). Mojave desert scrub. In ‘Biotic Communities, Southwestern United States and Northwestern Mexico’. (Ed. D. E. Brown.) pp. 157–168. (University of Utah Press: Salt Lake City, UT.)
United States Bureau of Land Management (1980). The California Desert conservation area plan, 1980. United States Bureau of Land Management, California Desert District, Riverside, CA. Available at: https://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/item/124196#page/3/mode/1up [accessed 14 February 2019].
United States Fish and Wildlife Service (1983). San Joaquin kit fox recovery plan. United States Fish and Wildlife Service, Portland, OR. Available at: https://babel.hathitrust.org/cgi/pt?id=mdp.39015024954813;view=1up;seq=1 [accessed 14 February 2019].
United States Fish and Wildlife Service (1998). Recovery plan for upland species of the San Joaquin Valley, California. United States Fish and Wildlife Service, Portland, OR. Available at: https://ecos.fws.gov/docs/recovery_plan/980930a.pdf [accessed 14 February 2019].
United States Climate Data (2014). Precipitation data for Barstow, CA. Available at: http://www.usclimatedata.com/climate/barstow/california/united-states/usca0069/2014/8 [accessed 4 December 2017].
Volterra, V. (1926). Fluctuations in the abundance of a species considered mathematically. Nature 118, 558–560.
| Fluctuations in the abundance of a species considered mathematically.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
White, P. J., Ralls, K., and Garrott, R. A. (1994). Coyote–kit fox interactions as revealed by telemetry. Canadian Journal of Zoology 72, 1831–1836.
| Coyote–kit fox interactions as revealed by telemetry.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
White, P. J., Ralls, K., and Vanderbilt White, C. A. (1995). Overlap in habitat and food use between coyotes and San Joaquin kit foxes. The Southwestern Naturalist 40, 342–349.
Young, J. A., and Young, C. G. (1992). ‘Seeds of Woody Plants in North America.’ (Dioscorides Press: Portland, OR.)
Zoellick, B. W., Smith, N. S., and Henry, R. S. (1989). Habitat use and movements of desert kit foxes in western Arizona. Journal of Wildlife Management 53, 955–961.
| Habitat use and movements of desert kit foxes in western Arizona.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
