Achieving forest conservation in Fiji through payment for ecosystem services schemes
Sangeeta Mangubhai
A B and Ruci Lumelume A
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations
A Wildlife Conservation Society, Fiji Country Program, 11 Ma’afu Street, Suva, Fiji.
B Corresponding author. Email: smangubhai@gmail.com
Pacific Conservation Biology 25(4) 386-393 https://doi.org/10.1071/PC18057
Submitted: 21 June 2018 Accepted: 17 January 2019 Published: 25 February 2019
Abstract
Most forests in Fiji are on native land owned by communities with tenure rights that are held largely with clans. Although there are examples in Fiji of local communities setting up conservation areas to protect their valuable forest resources, many are under pressure to issue leases to logging or mining companies for much-needed income. With inadequate legislation and government resources to secure the long-term protection of natural forests, conservation practitioners are looking at alternative models for establishing forest conservation areas in Fiji. One such model is the application of a forest payment for ecosystem services (PES) scheme to deliver both ecological and socioeconomic outcomes for local communities. A case study from Kilaka village, Fiji, is presented where the Wildlife Conservation Society (WCS) has worked with traditional land owners to secure a 99-year conservation lease for 402 ha of pristine native forest in Vanua Levu. The lease, which was brokered through the government iTaukei Land Trust Board, provides an alternative source of income to logging and mining. The management plan which is nested within a larger ecosystem-based management plan for the district, sets out the comanagement arrangements between the community and WCS, with the day-to-day management of the forest, enforcement, monitoring and evaluation led by the traditional landowning clan. This PES model and co-management arrangement has potential for replication to other priority forest areas to meet Fiji’s obligations under the Convention on Biological Diversity, but at an estimated financial cost ranging from US$69.0–287.8 million.
Additional keywords : biodiversity conservation, conservation tools, environmental management, Fiji islands, Pacific islands, PES
References
Abrams, R. W., Anwana, E. D., Ormsby, A., Dovie, D. B. K., Ajagbe, A., and Abrams, A. (2009). Integrating top-down with bottom-up conservation policy in Africa. Conservation Biology 23, 799–804.| Integrating top-down with bottom-up conservation policy in Africa.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 19627310PubMed |
Börner, J., Baylis, K., Corbera, E., Ezzine-de-Blas, D., Honey-Rosés, J., Persson, U. M., and Wunder, S. (2017). The effectiveness of payments for environmental services. World Development 96, 359–374.
| The effectiveness of payments for environmental services.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Chan, K. M. A., Pringle, R. M., Ranganatran, J., Boggs, C. L., Chan, Y. L., Ehrlich, P. R., Haff, P. K., Heller, N. E., Al-Krafaji, K., and Macmynowski, D. P. (2007). When agendas collide: human welfare and biological conservation. Conservation Biology 21, 59–68.
| When agendas collide: human welfare and biological conservation.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Cheung, W. W. L., and Sumaila, U. R. (2008). Trade-offs between conservation and socio-economic objectives in managing a tropical marine ecosystem. Ecological Economics 66, 193–210.
| Trade-offs between conservation and socio-economic objectives in managing a tropical marine ecosystem.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Corbera, E., and Pascual, U. (2012). Ecosystem services: heed social goals. Science 335, 655–656.
| Ecosystem services: heed social goals.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 22323797PubMed |
Engel, S., Pagiola, S., and Wunder, S. (2008). Designing payments for environment services in theory and practice: an overview of the issues. Ecological Economics 65, 663–674.
| Designing payments for environment services in theory and practice: an overview of the issues.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Ezzine-de-Blas, D., Wunder, S., Ruiz-Pérez, M., and Moreno-Sanchez, R del P. (2016). Global patterns in the implementation of payments for environmental services. PLoS One 11, e0149847.
| Global patterns in the implementation of payments for environmental services.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 27806043PubMed |
García-Amado, L. R., Pérez, M. R., Escutia, F. R., García, S. B., and Mejía, E. C. (2011). Efficiency of payments for environmental services: equity and additionality in a case study from a biosphere reserve in Chiapas, Mexico. Ecological Economics 70, 2361–2368.
| Efficiency of payments for environmental services: equity and additionality in a case study from a biosphere reserve in Chiapas, Mexico.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Greiber, T. (2009). ‘Payments for Ecosystem Services. Legal and Institutional Frameworks.’ (IUCN: Gland.)
Jack, B. K., and Santos, E. C. (2017). The leakage and livelihoods of PES contracts: a targeting experiment in Malawi. Land Use Policy 63, 645–658.
| The leakage and livelihoods of PES contracts: a targeting experiment in Malawi.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Jupiter, S. (2017). Culture, kastom and conservation in Melanesia: what happens when worldviews collide? Pacific Conservation Biology 23, 139–145.
| Culture, kastom and conservation in Melanesia: what happens when worldviews collide?Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Jupiter, S. D., Mangubhai, S., and Kingsford, R. T. (2014). Conservation of biodiversity in the Pacific Islands of Oceania: challenges and opportunities. Pacific Conservation Biology 20, 206–220.
| Conservation of biodiversity in the Pacific Islands of Oceania: challenges and opportunities.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Kemkes, R. J., Farley, J., and Koliba, C. J. (2010). Determining when payments are an effective policy approach to ecosystem service provision. Ecological Economics 69, 2069–2074.
| Determining when payments are an effective policy approach to ecosystem service provision.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Keppel, G. (2005). Summary report on forests of the Mataqali Nadicake Kilaka, Kubulau District, Bua, Vanua Levu. Report for the Wildlife Conservation Society, Suva.
Keppel, G., Morrison, C., Watling, D., Tuiwawa, M. V., and Rounds, I. A. (2012). Conservation in tropical Pacific Island countries: why most current approaches are failing. Conservation Letters 5, 256–265.
| Conservation in tropical Pacific Island countries: why most current approaches are failing.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Kerr, J. (2002). Watershed development, environmental services, and poverty alleviation in India. World Development 30, 1387–1400.
| Watershed development, environmental services, and poverty alleviation in India.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Kinzig, P., Perrings, C., Chapin, F. S., Polasky, S., Smith, V. K., Tilman, D., and Turner, B. L. (2011). Paying for ecosystem services – promise and peril. Science 334, 603–604.
| Paying for ecosystem services – promise and peril.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Kirmani, S., Brehme, C., Fisher, R., Hathaway, S., O'Brien, M., Masibalavu, V., Naikatini, A., Segaidina, M., Thomas, N., Tikoca, S., Tuiwawa, M., and Mangubhai, S. (2018). Terrestrial and archaeological surveys of Kilaka Forest Conservation Area, Kubulau District, Vanua Levu. Report No. 04/18. Wildlife Conservation Society, Suva.
Klein, C. J., Jupiter, S. D., Watts, M., and Possingham, H. P. (2014). Evaluating the influence of candidate terrestrial protected areas on coral reef condition in Fiji. Marine Policy 44, 360–365.
| Evaluating the influence of candidate terrestrial protected areas on coral reef condition in Fiji.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Mangubhai, S., Sykes, H., Lovell, E., Brodie, G., Jupiter, S., Lal, R., Lee, S., Loganimoce, E. M., Morris, C., Nand, Y., Qauqau, I., and Rashni, B. (2019). Fiji: coastal and marine ecosystems. In ‘World Seas: An Environmental Evaluation. Volume II: The Indian Ocean to the Pacific’. (Ed. C. Sheppard.) Chapter 44. (Elsevier: New York.)
Miller, T. R., Minteer, B. A., and Malan, L. -C. (2011). The new conservation debate: the view from practical ethics. Biological Conservation 144, 948–957.
| The new conservation debate: the view from practical ethics.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Olson, D., Farley, L., Patrick, A., Watling, D., Tuiwawa, M., Masibalavu, V., Lenoa, L., Bogiva, A., Qauqau, I., Atherton, J., Caginitoba, A., Tokota’a, M., Prasad, S., Naisilisili, W., Raikabula, A., Mailautoka, K., Morley, C., and Allnutt, T. (2010). Priority forests for conservation in Fiji: landscapes, hotspots and ecological processes. Oryx 44, 57–70.
| Priority forests for conservation in Fiji: landscapes, hotspots and ecological processes.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Pagiola, S. (2008). Payments for environmental services in Costa Rica. Ecological Economics 65, 712–724.
| Payments for environmental services in Costa Rica.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Pagiola, S., Agostini, P., Gobbi, J., de Haan, C., Ibrahim, M., Murgueitio, E., Ram’ırez, E., Rosales, M., and Ru’ız, P. R. (2004). Paying for biodiversity conservation services in agricultural landscapes. Environment Department Paper 96. World Bank, Washington, DC.
Pagiola, S., Arcenas, A., and Platais, G. (2005). Can payments for environmental services help reduce poverty? An exploration of the issues and the evidence to date from Latin America. World Development 33, 237–253.
| Can payments for environmental services help reduce poverty? An exploration of the issues and the evidence to date from Latin America.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Pascual, U., Phelps, J., Garmendia, E., Brown, K., Corbera, E., Martin, A., Gomez-Baggethun, E., and Muradian, R. (2014). Social equity matters in payments for ecosystem services. Bioscience 64, 1027–1036.
| Social equity matters in payments for ecosystem services.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Pattanayak, S. K., Wunder, S., and Ferraro, P. J. (2010). Show me the money: do payments supply environmental services in developing countries? Review of Environmental Economics and Policy 4, 254–274.
| Show me the money: do payments supply environmental services in developing countries?Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Persson, U. M., and Alpízar, F. (2013). Conditional cash transfers and payments for environmental services – a conceptual framework for explaining and judging differences in outcomes. World Development 43, 124–137.
| Conditional cash transfers and payments for environmental services – a conceptual framework for explaining and judging differences in outcomes.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Potapov, P., Hansen, M. C., Laestadius, L., Turubanova, S., Yaroshenko, A., Thies, C., Smith, W., Zhuravleva, I., Komarova, A., Minnemeyer, S., and Esipova, E. (2017). The last frontiers of wilderness: tracking loss of intact forest landscapes from 2000 to 2013. Science Advances 3, e1600821.
| The last frontiers of wilderness: tracking loss of intact forest landscapes from 2000 to 2013.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 28439536PubMed |
Salzman, J., Bennett, G., Carroll, N., Goldstein, A., and Jenkins, M. (2018). The global status and trends of payments for ecosystem services. Nature Sustainability 1, 136–144.
| The global status and trends of payments for ecosystem services.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Sloan, J., and Chand, K. (2016). An analysis of property rights in the Fijian qoliqoli. Marine Policy 72, 76–81.
| An analysis of property rights in the Fijian qoliqoli.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Smith, J., and Scherr, S. J. (2002). Forest carbon and local livelihoods: assessment of opportunities and policy recommendations. CIFOR Occasional Paper No. 37, Bogor.
Sommerville, M. M., Jones, J. P. G., and Milner-Gulland, E. J. (2009). A revised conceptual framework for payments for environmental services. Ecology and Society 14, 34.
| A revised conceptual framework for payments for environmental services.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Tomich, T. P., Thomas, D. E., and van Noordwijk, M. (2004). Environmental services and land use change in Southeast Asia: from recognition to regulation or reward? Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment 104, 229–244.
| Environmental services and land use change in Southeast Asia: from recognition to regulation or reward?Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Vukikomoala, K., Jupiter, S., Erasito, E., and Chand, K. (2012). An analysis of international law, national legislation, judgements, and institutions as they interrelate with territories and areas conserved by indigenous peoples and local communities. Report No. 19, Natural Justice in Bangalore and Kalpavriksh, Delhi.
Ward, R. G. (1995). Land, law and custom: diverging realities in Fiji. In ‘Land, Custom and Practice in the South Pacific’. (Eds R. G. Ward, and E. Kingdon.) Chapter 6, pp. 198‒249. (Cambridge University Press: Cambridge.)
WCS (2012). Ecosystem-based management plan: Kubulau District, Vanua Levu, Fiji, Suva.
WCS (2016). Kilaka Forest Conservation Area management plan, Suva.
Wunder, S. (2005). Payment for ecosystem services: some nuts and bolts. CIFOR Occasional Paper No. 42. Center for International Forestry Research, Jakarta.
Wunder, S. (2007). The efficiency of payments for environmental services in tropical conservation: essays. Conservation Biology 21, 48–58.
| The efficiency of payments for environmental services in tropical conservation: essays.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 17298510PubMed |
Wunder, S. (2008). Payments for environmental services and the poor: concepts and preliminary evidence. Environment and Development Economics 13, 279–297.
| Payments for environmental services and the poor: concepts and preliminary evidence.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Wunder, S. (2015). Revisiting the concept of payments for environmental services. Ecological Economics 117, 234–243.
| Revisiting the concept of payments for environmental services.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Zbinden, S., and Lee, D. R. (2005). Paying for environmental services: an analysis of participation in Costa Rica’s PSA Program. World Development 33, 255–272.
| Paying for environmental services: an analysis of participation in Costa Rica’s PSA Program.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
