Understanding attitudes on new technologies to manage invasive species
Nick Kirk
A C , Robyn Kannemeyer A , Alison Greenaway A , Edy MacDonald B and Dean Stronge A
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations
A Manaaki Whenua Landcare Research, 54 Gerald Street Lincoln 7608, New Zealand.
B Department of Conservation, 18 Manners Street, Wellington 6011, New Zealand.
C Corresponding author. Email: kirkn@landcareresearch.co.nz
Pacific Conservation Biology 26(1) 35-44 https://doi.org/10.1071/PC18080
Submitted: 19 October 2018 Accepted: 1 April 2019 Published: 13 June 2019
Journal Compilation © CSIRO 2020 Open Access CC BY-NC-ND
Abstract
Invasive animal species threaten global biodiversity. In New Zealand invasive species threaten iconic native species, and scientists are seeking approval to research new technologies that might be capable of eradicating these invasive species. The aim of this research was to understand what New Zealanders with an interest in pest control consider to be the main risks and benefits of introducing new technologies to manage invasive species. We invited key informants to participate in the focus groups, selecting people with knowledge and experience of pest control issues in New Zealand. Data were collected from seven focus groups held in three locations across New Zealand. A thematic analysis of the data was then conducted in which three key themes emerged: concern about the risk of unintended consequences, the benefits of landscape-scale technologies, and New Zealand being an early adopter of new technologies. The focus groups articulated a variety of benefits from introducing new technologies – such as replacing dangerous poisons with non-toxic alternatives – but it was the risks of the new technologies that dominated the discussions. Given these results, we recommend an education and communication strategy focussed on social learning, in conjunction with a codesigned decision-making process, to help establish social licence for the application of potentially controversial technologies.
Additional keywords: CRISPR, gene editing, pest control, pest-specific toxins, public attitudes, rats, Trojan Female Technique, wasps.
References
Baines, J., and Edwards, P. (2018). The role of relationships in achieving and maintaining a social licence in the New Zealand aquaculture sector. Aquaculture 485, 140–146.| The role of relationships in achieving and maintaining a social licence in the New Zealand aquaculture sector.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Baltimore, D., Berg, P., Botchan, M., Carroll, D., Charo, R. A., Church, G., Corn, J. E., Daley, G. Q., Doudna, J. A., Fenne, R. M., and Greely, H. T. (2015). A prudent path forward for genomic engineering and germline gene modification. Science 348, 36–38.
| A prudent path forward for genomic engineering and germline gene modification.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 25791083PubMed |
Beets, R. (2016). Governing CRISPR: evaluating ethics, risk, and regulation in gene drive research. MSc thesis, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA.
Bergstrom, D. M., Lucieer, A., Kiefer, K., Wasley, J., Belbin, L., Pedersen, T. K., and Chown, S. L. (2009). Indirect effects of invasive species removal devastate World Heritage island. Journal of Applied Ecology 46, 73–81.
| Indirect effects of invasive species removal devastate World Heritage island.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Berkett, N., Fenemor, A., Newton, M., and Sinner, J. (2018). Collaborative freshwater planning: changing roles for science and scientists. Australasian Journal of Water Resources 22, 39–51.
| Collaborative freshwater planning: changing roles for science and scientists.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Bidwell, S. (2012). Talking about 1080: risk, trust and protecting our place. M. PubHealth, University of Otago, Dunedin. Available at http://hdl.handle.net/10523/2186 [Verified 16 May 2019].
Bidwell, S., and Thompson, L. (2015). Place invaders: identity, place attachment and possum control in the South Island west coast of New Zealand. New Zealand Geographer 71, 81–90.
| Place invaders: identity, place attachment and possum control in the South Island west coast of New Zealand.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Blomkamp, E. (2018). The promise of co-design for public policy. In ‘Routledge handbook of policy design’. (Eds M. Howlett, and I. Mukherjee.) pp. 77–92. (Routledge: Milton Park, UK.)
Bloor, M. (2001). ‘Focus groups in social research.’ (Sage Publications: Thousand Oaks, CA, USA.)
Boyatzis, R. (1998). ‘Transforming qualitative information: thematic analysis and code development.’ (Sage Publications: Thousand Oaks, CA, USA.)
Braun, V., and Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology 3, 77–101.
| Using thematic analysis in psychology.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Burget, M., Bardone, E., and Pedaste, M. (2017). Definitions and conceptual dimensions of responsible research and innovation: a literature review. Science and Engineering Ethics 23, 1–19.
| Definitions and conceptual dimensions of responsible research and innovation: a literature review.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 27090147PubMed |
Burns, M., and Medvecky, F. (2018). The disengaged in science communication: how not to count audiences and publics. Public Understanding of Science 27, 118–130.
| The disengaged in science communication: how not to count audiences and publics.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 27888259PubMed |
Champer, J., Buchman, A., and Akbari, O. S. (2016). Cheating evolution: engineering gene drives to manipulate the fate of wild populations. Nature Reviews. Genetics 17, 146–159.
| Cheating evolution: engineering gene drives to manipulate the fate of wild populations.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 26875679PubMed |
Clavero, M., and García-Berthou, E. (2005). Invasive species are a leading cause of animal extinctions. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 20, 110.
| Invasive species are a leading cause of animal extinctions.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Corlett, R. T. (2017). A bigger toolbox: biotechnology in biodiversity conservation. Trends in Biotechnology 35, 55–65.
| A bigger toolbox: biotechnology in biodiversity conservation.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 27424151PubMed |
Cronin, K. (2008). The privatization of public talk: a New Zealand case study on the use of dialogue for civic engagement in biotechnology governance. New Genetics & Society 27, 285–299.
| The privatization of public talk: a New Zealand case study on the use of dialogue for civic engagement in biotechnology governance.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Crowl, T. A., Crist, T. O., Parmenter, R. R., Belovsky, G., and Lugo, A. E. (2008). The spread of invasive species and infectious disease as drivers of ecosystem change. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment 6, 238–246.
| The spread of invasive species and infectious disease as drivers of ecosystem change.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Crowley, S. L., Hinchliffe, S., and McDonald, R. A. (2017). Conflict in invasive species management. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment 15, 133–141.
| Conflict in invasive species management.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Dare, M., Schirmer, J., and Vanclay, F. (2014). Community engagement and social licence to operate. Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal 32, 188–197.
| Community engagement and social licence to operate.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Davison, I. (2018). Time to reignite GE debate in New Zealand, says Sir Peter Gluckman. Available at https://www.nzherald.co.nz/nz/news/article.cfm?c_id=1&objectid=12081256 [accessed 15 October 2018].
Dearden, P. K., Gemmell, N. J., Mercier, O. R., Lester, P. J., Scott, M. J., Newcomb, R. D., Buckley, T. R., Jacobs, J. M., Goldson, S. G., and Penman, D. R. (2018). The potential for the use of gene drives for pest control in New Zealand: a perspective. Journal of the Royal Society of New Zealand 48, 225–244.
| The potential for the use of gene drives for pest control in New Zealand: a perspective.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Duckworth, J. A., Byrom, A. E., Fisher, P., and Horn, C. (2006). Pest control: does the answer lie in new biotechnologies? In ‘Biological Invasions in New Zealand’. (Eds R. B. Allen, and W. G. Lee.) pp. 421–434. (Springer: Berlin.)
Edwards, S. (2017). Research into genetically modified organisms in New Zealand: an examination of a sociotechnical controversy. Ph.D. Thesis, Lincoln University, New Zealand.
Edwards, P., and Trafford, S. (2016). Social licence in New Zealand – what is it? Journal of the Royal Society of New Zealand 46, 165–180.
| Social licence in New Zealand – what is it?Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
El-Kafafi, S. (2017). Genetic engineering perception in New Zealand: is it the way of the future? In ‘World Sustainable Development Outlook 2007: Knowledge Management and Sustainable Development in the 21st Century’. (Ed. A. Ahmed.) pp. 200. (Greenleaf Publications: Sheffield, UK.)
Farnworth, M. J., Campbell, J., and Adams, N. J. (2011). What’s in a Name? Perceptions of stray and feral cat welfare and control in Aotearoa. New Zealand Journal of Applied Animal Welfare Science 14, 59–74.
| What’s in a Name? Perceptions of stray and feral cat welfare and control in Aotearoa.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 21191848PubMed |
Farnworth, M. J., Watson, H., and Adams, N. J. (2014). Understanding attitudes toward the control of nonnative wild and feral mammals: similarities and differences in the opinions of the general public, animal protectionists, and conservationists in New Zealand (Aotearoa). Journal of Applied Animal Welfare Science 17, 1–17.
| Understanding attitudes toward the control of nonnative wild and feral mammals: similarities and differences in the opinions of the general public, animal protectionists, and conservationists in New Zealand (Aotearoa).Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 23927074PubMed |
Fereday, J., and Muir-Cochrane, E. (2006). Demonstrating rigor using thematic analysis: a hybrid approach of inductive and deductive coding and theme development. International Journal of Qualitative Methods 5, 80–92.
| Demonstrating rigor using thematic analysis: a hybrid approach of inductive and deductive coding and theme development.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Fitzgerald, G., Saunders, L., and Wilkinson, R. (1994). ‘Doing good, doing harm: public perceptions and issues in the biological control of possums and rabbits’. (MAF Policy and Landcare Research: Lincoln, NZ.)
Fitzgerald, G., Saunders L., and Wilkinson, R. (1996a). Public attitudes to the biological control of rabbits in New Zealand – MAF Policy Technical Paper 96/3. Ministry of Agriculture, Wellington, NZ.
Fitzgerald, G., Saunders, L., and Wilkinson, R. (1996b). Public perceptions and issues in the present and future management of possums – MAF Policy Technical Paper 96/4. Ministry of Agriculture, Wellington, NZ.
Fitzgerald, G., Wilkinson, R., and Saunders, L. (2000). Public perceptions and issues in possum control. In ‘The brushtail possum: biology, impact and management of an introduce marsupial’. (Ed. T. L. Montague) pp. 187–197. (Manaaki Whenua Press: Lincoln, NZ.)
Fitzgerald, G., Fitzgerald N., and Wilkinson, R. (2002). ‘Social acceptability of stoats and stoat control methods: focus group findings’. (Department of Conservation: Wellington, NZ.)
Fitzgerald, G., Fitzgerald N., and Wilkinson, R. (2005). ‘Social acceptability of stoats and stoat control methods: a survey of the New Zealand public’. (Department of Conservation: Wellington, NZ.)
Fraser, W. (2001). ‘Introduced wildlife in New Zealand: A survey of general public views’. (Manaaki Whenua Press: Lincoln, NZ.)
Gamble, J. C., Payne, T., and Small, B. (2010). Interviews with New Zealand community stakeholders regarding acceptability of potential pest eradication technologies. New Zealand Journal of Crop and Horticultural Science 38, 57–68.
| Interviews with New Zealand community stakeholders regarding acceptability of potential pest eradication technologies.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Gemmell, N. J., Jalilzadeh, A., Didham, R. K., Soboleva, T., and Tompkins, D. M. (2013). The Trojan female technique: a novel, effective and humane approach for pest population control. Proceedings of the Royal Society. B 280, 20132549.
| The Trojan female technique: a novel, effective and humane approach for pest population control.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 24266039PubMed |
Gluckman, P. (2016). New technologies and social consensus. In ‘17th International Biotechnology Symposium, Melbourne, 24–26 October’. Available at https://www.pmcsa.org.nz/wp-content/uploads/Discussion-of-Social-Licence.pdf [Verified 16 May 2019].
Green, W., and Rohan, M. (2012). Opposition to aerial 1080 poisoning for control of invasive mammals in New Zealand: risk perceptions and agency responses. Journal of the Royal Society of New Zealand 42, 185–213.
| Opposition to aerial 1080 poisoning for control of invasive mammals in New Zealand: risk perceptions and agency responses.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Grimes, M. (2017). Procedural fairness and political trust. In ‘Handbook on political trust’. (Eds S. Zmerli and T. Van der Meer.) p. 256. (Edward Elgar: Cheltenham, UK.)
Hagendijk, R., and Irwin, A. (2006). Public deliberation and governance: engaging with science and technology in contemporary Europe. Minerva 44, 167–184.
| Public deliberation and governance: engaging with science and technology in contemporary Europe.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Harvey-Samuel, T., Ant, T., and Alphey, L. (2017). Towards the genetic control of invasive species. Biological Invasions 19, 1683–1703.
| Towards the genetic control of invasive species.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 28620268PubMed |
Hipkins, R., Stockwell, W., Bolstad, R., and Baker, R. (2002). Commonsense, trust and science: how patterns of beliefs and attitudes to science pose challenges for effective communication. Ministry of Research, Science and Technology, Wellington, New Zealand.
Horn, C., and Kilvington, M. (2002). ‘Maori and 1080.’ (Landcare Research: Auckland, NZ.)
Kannemeyer, R. L. (2013). Public attitudes to pest control and aerial 1080 use in the Coromandel. University of Auckland.
Kannemeyer, R. L. (2017). A systematic literature review of attitudes to pest control methods in New Zealand. (Manaaki Whenua Landcare Research: Linconln, NZ.)
Kruger, R. A. (1994). ‘Focus group: practical guide for applied research.’ (Sage Publicaitons: Thousand Oaks, CA, USA.)
Ledford, H. (2015). CRISPR, the disruptor. Nature 522, 20.
| CRISPR, the disruptor.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 26040877PubMed |
Lester, P., Beggs, J., Brown, R., Edwards, E., Groenteman, R., Toft, R., Twidle, A., and Ward, D. (2013). The outlook for control of New Zealand’s most abundant, widespread and damaging invertebrate pests: social wasps. New Zealand Science Review 70, 56–62.
Macnaghten, P. (2017). Focus groups as anticipatory methodology: a contribution from science and technology studies towards socially resilient governance. In ‘A new era in focus group research’. (Eds R. S. Barbour, and D. L. Morgan.) pp. 343–363. (Springer: Berlin.)
Malpass, L. (2013). Rule of law or social licence to operate? Available at: https://nzinitiative.org.nz/reports-and-media/opinion/rule-of-law-or-social-licence-to-operate/ [accessed 15 October 2018].
McEntee, M. (2007). Participation and communication approaches that influence public and media response to scientific risk: a comparative study of two biosecurity events in New Zealand. The International Journal of Interdisciplinary Social Science 2, 195203.
Mercer-Mapstone, L., Rifkin, W., Moffat, K., and Louis, W. (2017). Conceptualising the role of dialogue in social licence to operate. Resources Policy 54, 137–146.
| Conceptualising the role of dialogue in social licence to operate.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Mercier, O. R., King Hunt, A., and Lester, P. (2019). Novel biotechnologies for eradicating wasps: seeking Māori studies student’s perspectives with Q methods. Kōtuitui. New Zealand Journal of Social Sciences Online 14, 136–156.
| Novel biotechnologies for eradicating wasps: seeking Māori studies student’s perspectives with Q methods.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Moffat, K., and Zhang, A. (2014). The paths to social licence to operate: an integrative model explaining community acceptance of mining. Resources Policy 39, 61–70.
| The paths to social licence to operate: an integrative model explaining community acceptance of mining.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Moffat, K., Lacey, J., Zhang, A., and Leipold, S. (2016). The social licence to operate: a critical review. Forestry: An International Journal of Forest Research 89, 477–488.
| The social licence to operate: a critical review.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Niemic, R. M., Pech, R. P., Norbury, G. L., and Byrom, A. E. (2017). Landowners’ perspectives on coordinated, landscape-level invasive species control: the role of social and ecological context. Environmental Management 59, 477–489.
| Landowners’ perspectives on coordinated, landscape-level invasive species control: the role of social and ecological context.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Olsson, P., Gunderson, L. H., Carpenter, S. R., Ryan, P., Lebel, L., Folke, C., and Holling, C. S. (2006). Shooting the rapids: navigating transitions to adaptive governance of social–ecological systems. Ecology and Society 11, 18.
| Shooting the rapids: navigating transitions to adaptive governance of social–ecological systems.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Owen, R., Macnaghten, P., and Stilgoe, J. (2012). Responsible research and innovation: from science in society to science for society, with society. Science & Public Policy 39, 751–760.
| Responsible research and innovation: from science in society to science for society, with society.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Patton, M. (2015). ‘Qualitative research and evaluation methods: integrating theory and practice.’ (Sage: Los Angeles, CA, USA.)
PCE (Parliamentary Commissioner for the Environment) (2017). Taonga of an island nation: saving New Zealand’s birds. (Parliamentary Commissioner for the Environment: Wellington, NZ.)
Porth, E. H., Dandy, N., and Marzano, M. (2015). ‘My garden is the one with no trees’: residential lived experiences of the 2012 Asian longhorn beetle eradication programme in Kent, England. Human Ecology 43, 669–679.
| ‘My garden is the one with no trees’: residential lived experiences of the 2012 Asian longhorn beetle eradication programme in Kent, England.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Priest, S.H. (2017). Science and technology policy and ethics: what role should science museums play? In ‘Science and civic life’. (Eds L. Morrissey and R. Garfinkle.) pp. 55–65. (Routledge: Abingdon, UK.)
Richardson-Harman, N., Phelps, T., Mooney, P., and Ball, R. (1998). Consumer perceptions of fruit production technologies. New Zealand Journal of Crop and Horticultural Science 26, 181–192.
Rogers-Hayden, T., and Pidgeon, N. (2007). Moving engagement “upstream”? Nanotechnologies and the Royal Society and Royal Academy of Engineering’s inquiry. Public Understanding of Science 16, 345–364.
| Moving engagement “upstream”? Nanotechnologies and the Royal Society and Royal Academy of Engineering’s inquiry.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Royal Society Te Apārangi (2017). The use of gene editing to create gene drives for pest control in New Zealand. (Royal Society Te Apārangi Gene Editing Panel: Thorndon, Wellington, NZ.)
Russell, J. (2014). A comparison of attitudes towards introduced wildlife in New Zealand in 1994 and 2012. Journal of the Royal Society of New Zealand 44, 136–151.
| A comparison of attitudes towards introduced wildlife in New Zealand in 1994 and 2012.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Sheppard, R., and Urquhart L. (1991). Attitudes to pest control methods: results from sample survey of the New Zealand Population – Research Report no. 2010. (Agribusiness and Economics Research Unit, Lincoln University: Lincoln, NZ.)
Stewart, D. W., and Shamdasani, P. N. (2014). ‘Focus groups: theory and practice.’ (Sage: London.)
Thomson, I., and Joyce, S. (2008). The social licence to operate: what is it and why does it seem so difficult to obtain. In ‘PDAC Convention, Toronto, Canada, March 2008’. Available at https://oncommonground.ca/wp-content/downloads/PDAC_2008_Social_Licence.pdf [Verified 16 May 2019].
Von Schomberg, R. (2013). A vision of responsible research and innovation. In ‘Responsible innovation: managing the responsible emergence of science and innovation in society’. (Eds R. Owen, J. Bessant and M. Heintz.) pp. 51–74. (John Wiley & Sons: Chichester, UK.)
Wilkinson, R., and Fitzgerald, G. (1997). Public perceptions of biological control of rabbits in New Zealand: Some ethical and practical issues. Agriculture and Human Values 14, 273–282.
| Public perceptions of biological control of rabbits in New Zealand: Some ethical and practical issues.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Wilkinson, R., and Fitzgerald, G. (1998). ‘Public attitudes to rabbit calicivirus disease in New Zealand’ (Manaaki Whenua Press: Lincoln, NZ.)
Wilkinson, R., and Fitzgerald, G. (2006). ‘Public attitudes toward possum fertility control and genetic engineering in New Zealand’ (Manaaki Whenua Press: Lincoln, NZ.)
Wilkinson, R., and Fitzgerald, G. (2014). ‘Social acceptability of the Trojan Female Technique for biological control of pests.’ (Department of Environment and Primary Industries, Victorian Government: Melbourne.)
Wilkinson, R., Fitzgerald, G., and Chittenden, D. (2000). Public and interest group perceptions of possum fertility controls: a summary of the focus groups. In ‘Caught in the headlights: New Zealanders’ reflection on possums, control options and genetic engineering’. (Ed. J. Boland) pp. 101–121. (Parliamentary Commissioner for the Environment: Wellington, NZ.)
Wilsdon, J., and Willis, R. (2004). ‘See-through science: why public engagement needs to move upstream.’ (Demos: London.)
Wilson, C., and Cannon, J. (2004). ‘Community consultation processes for aerial 1080 applications.’ (Department of Conservation: Wellington, NZ.)
Wynne, B. (2006). Public engagement as a means of restoring public trust in science – hitting the notes, but missing the music? Public Health Genomics 9, 211–220.
| Public engagement as a means of restoring public trust in science – hitting the notes, but missing the music?Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Zhang, A., Measham, T. G., and Moffat, K. (2018). Preconditions for social licence: the importance of information in initial engagement. Journal of Cleaner Production 172, 1559–1566.
| Preconditions for social licence: the importance of information in initial engagement.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
