Environmental decisions and the work/life environment: a story of how the edge brought prioritisation to the fore
Eve McDonald-Madden
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations
Centre for Biodiversity and Conservation Science, School of Earth and Environmental Science, University of Queensland, St Lucia, Qld 4072, Australia and ARC Centre for Excellence for Environmental Decisions, University of Queensland, St Lucia, Qld 4072, Australia. Email: e.mcdonaldmadden@uq.edu.au
Pacific Conservation Biology 24(3) 256-260 https://doi.org/10.1071/PC18043
Submitted: 9 May 2018 Accepted: 3 July 2018 Published: 20 July 2018
Abstract
Finding your feet in the world of work/life balance is challenging. There are so many things to consider. Sometimes it feels like a disaster on all fronts. In reality we have to make trade-offs and prioritise between work and life but unfortunately doing this is not just common sense. Making good decisions hinges on a way of problem-solving steeped in decades of research in the fields of economics, applied mathematics, philosophy and psychology – known as decision analysis – an approach famously described as a formalisation of common sense for decision problems which are too complex for informal use of common sense. Examining environmental decisions through the lens of this approach is the focus of my groups’ research. In this reflective piece I share my struggle with the complex and dynamic trade-offs between work and family life, and outline the steps of decision analysis in this context drawing on parallels with my research in environmental decision-making.
References
Arkes, H. R., and Blumer, C. (1985). The psychology of sunk cost. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 35, 124–140.| The psychology of sunk cost.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Baron, J. (1985). ‘Rationality and Intelligence.’ (Cambridge University Press: Cambridge.)
Bell, D. E., Raiffa, H., and Tversky, A. (1988). ‘Decision Making: Descriptive, Normative, and Prescriptive Interactions.’ (Cambridge University Press: Cambridge.)
Bendels, M. H. K., Müller, R., Brueggmann, D., and Groneberg, D. A. (2018). Gender disparities in high-quality research revealed by Nature Index journals. PLoS One 13, e0189136.
| Gender disparities in high-quality research revealed by Nature Index journals.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Chades, I., McDonald-Madden, E., McCarthy, M. A., Wintle, B., Linkie, M., and Possingham, H. P. (2008). When to stop managing or surveying cryptic threatened species. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 105, 13936–13940.
| When to stop managing or surveying cryptic threatened species.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Freeling, A. (1984). A philosophical basis for decision aiding. Theory and Decision 16, 179–206.
| A philosophical basis for decision aiding.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Game, E. T., Kareiva, P., and Possingham, H. P. (2013). Six common mistakes in conservation priority setting. Conservation Biology 27, 480–485.
| Six common mistakes in conservation priority setting.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Game, E. T., Meijaard, E., Sheil, D., and McDonald‐Madden, E. (2014). Conservation in a wicked complex world; challenges and solutions. Conservation Letters 7, 271–277.
| Conservation in a wicked complex world; challenges and solutions.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Groves, C. R., and Game, E. T. (2016). Conservation planning: informed decisions for a healthier planet. (Roberts and Company Publishers: Greenwood Village, CO.)
Kahneman, D., and Tversky, A. (1979). Prospect Theory: an analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica 47, 263–291.
| Prospect Theory: an analysis of decision under risk.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Keefer, D. L., Kirkwood, C. W., and Corner, J. L. (2004). Perspective on decision analysis applications, 1990–2001. Decision Analysis 1, 4–22.
| Perspective on decision analysis applications, 1990–2001.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Keeney, R. L. (1982). Decision analysis: an overview. Operations Research 30, 803–838.
| Decision analysis: an overview.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Keeney, R. L. (1996). ‘Value-focused Thinking: a Path to Creative Decisionmaking.’ (Harvard University Press: Cambridge, MA.)
McDonald-Madden, E., Baxter, P. W. J., Fuller, R. A., Martin, T. G., Game, E. T., Montambault, J., and Possingham, H. P. (2010a). Monitoring does not always count. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 25, 547–550.
| Monitoring does not always count.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
McDonald-Madden, E., Probert, W. J. M., Hauser, C. E., Runge, M. C., Possingham, H. P., Jones, M. E., Moore, J. L., Rout, T. M., Vesk, P. A., and Wintle, B. A. (2010b). Active adaptive conservation of threatened species in the face of uncertainty. Ecological Applications 20, 1476–1489.
| Active adaptive conservation of threatened species in the face of uncertainty.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
McDonald-Madden, E., Baxter, P. W. J., Fuller, R. A., Martin, T. G., Game, E. T., Montambault, J., and Possingham, H. P. (2011a). Should we implement monitoring or research for conservation? Trends in Ecology & Evolution 26, 108–109.
| Should we implement monitoring or research for conservation?Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
McDonald-Madden, E., Chadès, I., McCarthy, M. A., Linkie, M., and Possingham, H. P. (2011b). Allocating conservation resources between areas where persistence of a species is uncertain. Ecological Applications 21, 844–858.
| Allocating conservation resources between areas where persistence of a species is uncertain.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
McDonald-Madden, E., Runge, M. C., Possingham, H. P., and Martin, T. G. (2011c). Optimal timing for managed relocation of species faced with climate change. Nature Climate Change 1, 261–265.
| Optimal timing for managed relocation of species faced with climate change.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
McDonald-Madden, E., Sabbadin, R., Game, E. T., Baxter, P. W. J., Chades, I., and Possingham, H. P. (2016). Using food-web theory to conserve ecosystems. Nature Communications 7, 10245.
| Using food-web theory to conserve ecosystems.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Runge, M. C., Stroeve, J. C., Barrett, A. P., and McDonald-Madden, E. (2016). Detecting failure of climate predictions. Nature Climate Change 6, 861–864.
| Detecting failure of climate predictions.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
The Lancet (2018). Year of reckoning for women in science. The Lancet 391, 513.
| Year of reckoning for women in science.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Tversky, A., and Kahneman, D. (1974). Judgment under uncertainty: heuristics and biases. Science 185, 1124–1131.
| Judgment under uncertainty: heuristics and biases.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Tversky, A., and Kahneman, D. (1986). Rational choice and the framing of decisions. The Journal of Business 59, S251–S278.
| Rational choice and the framing of decisions.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
United Nations (2015). Transforming our world: the 2030 agenda for sustainable development.
