A serendipitous journey from finance to science

References

Broadhurst, L., Lowe, A., Coates, D., Cunningham, S., McDonald, M., Vesk, P., and Yates, C. (2008). Seed supply for broadscale restoration: maximizing evolutionary potential. Evolutionary Applications 1, 587–597.

Broadhurst, L., Prober, S., Dickson, F., and Bush, D. (2017). Using restoration as an experimental framework to test provenancing strategies and climate adapability. Ecological Management & Restoration 18, 205–208.
| Using restoration as an experimental framework to test provenancing strategies and climate adapability.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Bucharova, A., Durka, W., Hölzel, N., Kollmann, J., Michalski, S., and Bossdorf, O. (2017). Are local plants the best for ecosystem restoration? It depends on how you analyze the data. Ecology and Evolution 7, 10683–10689.
| Are local plants the best for ecosystem restoration? It depends on how you analyze the data.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Callaham, R. Z. (1964). Provenance research: investigation of genetic diversity associated with geography. Unasylva 18, 40–50.

Conservation Commission of Western Australia (2013). Forest management plan 2014–2023. State of Western Australia, Perth. Available at: https://www.dpaw.wa.gov.au/images/documents/conservation-management/forests/FMP/20130282_WEB_FOREST_MGT_PLAN_WEB.pdf [accessed 24 May 2018].

Edmands, S. (2007). Between a rock and a hard place: evaluating the relative risks of inbreeding and outbreeding for conservation and management. Molecular Ecology 16, 463–475.
| Between a rock and a hard place: evaluating the relative risks of inbreeding and outbreeding for conservation and management.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Fisher, R. (1930). ‘The Genetical Theory of Natural Selection.’ (Clarendon Press: Oxford.)

Hassan, R., Scholes, R., and Ash, R. (Eds) (2005). ‘Ecosystems and Human Well-being: Currrent State and Trends: Findings of the Condition and Trends Working Group.’ (Island Press: Washington.)

Hubert, J., and Cottrell, J. (2007). ‘The Role of Forest Genetic Resources in Helping British Forests Respond to Climate Change.’ (The Forestry Commision: Edinburgh.)

Hufford, K. M., Veneklaas, E. J., Lambers, H., and Krauss, S. L. (2016). Genetic delineation of local provenances defines seed collection zones along a climate gradient. AoB Plants 8, plv149.
| Genetic delineation of local provenances defines seed collection zones along a climate gradient.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

IPBES (2016). Summary for policymakers of the assessment report of the Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services on pollinators, pollination and food production. Secretariat of the Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services, Bonn.

Jones, A. T., Hayes, M. J., and Sackville Hamilton, N. R. (2001). The effect of provenance on the performance of Crataegus monogyna in hedges. Journal of Applied Ecology 38, 952–962.
| The effect of provenance on the performance of Crataegus monogyna in hedges.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Keller, M., Kollman, J., and Edwards, P. J. (2000). Genetic introgression from distant provenances reduces fitness in local weed populations. Journal of Applied Ecology 37, 647–659.
| Genetic introgression from distant provenances reduces fitness in local weed populations.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Knapp, E. E., and Dyer, A. R. (1998). When do genetic considerations require special approaches to ecological restoration? In ‘Conservation Biology for the Coming Decade’. (Eds P. L. Fielder, and P. M. Kareiva.) pp. 346–363. (Chapman & Hall: New York.)

Leimu, R., and Fischer, M. (2008). A meta-analysis of local adaptation in plants. PLoS One 3, e4010.
| A meta-analysis of local adaptation in plants.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Levin, D. A. (1993). Local speciation in plants: the rule not the exception. Systematic Botany 18, 197–208.
| Local speciation in plants: the rule not the exception.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

McKay, J. K., Christian, C. E., Harrison, S. P., and Rice, K. J. (2005). “How local is local?” – a review of practical and conceptual issues in the genetics of restoration. Restoration Ecology 13, 432–440.
| “How local is local?” – a review of practical and conceptual issues in the genetics of restoration.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Millennium Ecosystem Assessment (2005). ‘Ecosystems and Human Welbeing: Current Status and Trends. Volume 1.’ (Island Press: Washington, DC.)

Mitton, J. B. (1994). Molecular approaches to population biology. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 25, 45–69.
| Molecular approaches to population biology.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Mortlock, W. (2000). Local seed for revegetation: where will all that seed come from? Ecological Management & Restoration 1, 93–101.
| Local seed for revegetation: where will all that seed come from?Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Parker, P. G., Snow, A. A., Schug, M. D., Booton, G. C., and Fuerst, P. A. (1998). What can molecules tell us about populations: choosing and using a molecular marker. Ecology 79, 361–382.

Potts, B. M., Barbour, R. C., Hingston, A. B., and Vaillancourt, R. E. (2003). Genetic pollution of native eucalypt gene pools – identifying the risks. Australian Journal of Botany 51, 1–25.
| Genetic pollution of native eucalypt gene pools – identifying the risks.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Reed, M., Buenemann, M., Atlhopheng, J., Akhtar-Schuster, M., Bachmann, F., Bastin, G., Bigas, H., Chanda, R., Dougill, A. J., Essahli, W., Evely, A. C., et al. (2011). Cross-scale monitoring and assessment of land degradation and sustainable land management: a methodological framework for knowledge management. Land Degradation & Development 22, 261–271.
| Cross-scale monitoring and assessment of land degradation and sustainable land management: a methodological framework for knowledge management.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Saltonstall, K. (2002). Cryptic invasion by a non-native genotype of the common reed, Phragmites australis, into North America. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 99, 2445–2449.
| Cryptic invasion by a non-native genotype of the common reed, Phragmites australis, into North America.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Seliskar, D. M. (1985). Effect of reciprocal transplanting between extremes of plant zones on morphometric plasticity of five plant species in an Oregon salt marsh. Canadian Journal of Botany 63, 2254–2262.
| Effect of reciprocal transplanting between extremes of plant zones on morphometric plasticity of five plant species in an Oregon salt marsh.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Templeton, A. R. (1986). Coadaptation and outbreeding depression. In ‘Conservation Biology. The Science of Scarcity and Diversity’. (Ed. M. E. Soulé.) pp. 105–116. (Sinauer Associates, Inc.: Sunderland, MA.)

Turesson, G. (1922). The genotypical response of the plant species to the habitat. Hereditas 3, 211–350.
| The genotypical response of the plant species to the habitat.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Turesson, G. (1925). The plant species in relation to habitat and climate. Hereditas 6, 147–236.
| The plant species in relation to habitat and climate.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Waser, N. M., and Price, M. V. (1985). Reciprocal transplant experiments with Delphinium nelsonii (Ranunculaceae): evidence for local adaptation. American Journal of Botany 72, 1726–1732.
| Reciprocal transplant experiments with Delphinium nelsonii (Ranunculaceae): evidence for local adaptation.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Williams, G. C. (1966). ‘Adaptation and Natural Selection.’ (Princeton University Press: Princeton, NJ.)

Wright, S. (1922). Coefficients of inbreeding and relationship. American Naturalist 56, 330–338.
| Coefficients of inbreeding and relationship.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |