Nature conservation in a brave new (post-truth) world: arguments for and against public advocacy by conservation biologists

References

Abbey, E. (1975). ‘The Monkey Wrench Gang.’ (Avon Books: New York.)

Adam, P. (2017). Can ideas be dangerous? Australian Zoologist 38, 329–374.
| Can ideas be dangerous?Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Anderson, I. (1993). Wester [sic] Australia ‘censored’ forest reports. New Scientist Magazine issue 1863. Available at: https://www.newscientist.com/article/mg13718630-300-wester-australia-censored-forest-reports/ [accessed 5 June 2017].

Antilla, L. (2010). Self-censorship and science: a geographical review of media coverage of climate tipping points. Public Understanding of Science (Bristol, England) 19, 240–256.
| Self-censorship and science: a geographical review of media coverage of climate tipping points.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Arthrington, A. H. (2012). ‘Environmental Flows: Saving Rivers In The Third Millenium.’ (University of California Press: Berkeley.)

Austin, A., and Phoenix, L. (2005). The neoconservative assault on the Earth: the environmental imperialism of the Bush administration. Capitalism, Nature, Socialism 16, 25–44.
| The neoconservative assault on the Earth: the environmental imperialism of the Bush administration.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Barry, D., and Oelschlaeger, M. (1996). A science for survival: values and conservation biology. Conservation Biology 10, 905–911.
| A science for survival: values and conservation biology.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Baum, J. K., Myers, R. A., Kehler, D. G., Worm, B., Harley, S. J., and Doherty, P. A. (2003). Collapse and conservation of shark populations in the northwest Atlantic. Science 299, 389–392.
| Collapse and conservation of shark populations in the northwest Atlantic.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Baumgaertner, B., and Holthuijzen, W. (2017). On non-epistemic values in conservation biology. Conservation Biology 31, 48–55.
| On non-epistemic values in conservation biology.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Baxter, T. I. (2014). A law unto themselves? Australian regulation of forestry operations. Ph.D. Thesis, Faculty of Law, University of Tasmania, Hobart.

Beck, M. W., Brumbaugh, R. D., Airoldi, L., Carranza, A., Coen, L. D., Crawford, C., Defeo, O., Edgar, G. J., Hancock, B., Kay, M. C., Lenihan, H. S., Luckenbach, M. W., Toropova, C. L., Zhang, G., and Guo, X. (2011). Oyster reefs at risk and recommendations for conservation, restoration, and management. Bioscience 61, 107–116.
| Oyster reefs at risk and recommendations for conservation, restoration, and management.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Bella, D. A. (1996). The pressures of organizations and the responsibilities of university professors. Bioscience 46, 772–778.
| The pressures of organizations and the responsibilities of university professors.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Berns, K. I., Atlas, R. M., Cassell, G., and Shoemaker, J. (1998). Preventing the misuse of microorganisms: the role of the American Society for Microbiology in protecting against biological weapons. Critical Reviews in Microbiology 24, 273–280.
| Preventing the misuse of microorganisms: the role of the American Society for Microbiology in protecting against biological weapons.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Bonyhady, T. (2000). ‘The Colonial Earth.’ (Melbourne University Press: Melbourne.)

Boon, P. I. (2017). ‘The Hawkesbury River: A Social And Natural History.’ (CSIRO Publishing: Melbourne.)

Boon, P. I., and Prahalad, V. (2017). Ecologists, economics and politics: problems and contradictions in applying neoliberal ideology to nature conservation in Australia. Pacific Conservation Biology 23, 115–132.
| Ecologists, economics and politics: problems and contradictions in applying neoliberal ideology to nature conservation in Australia.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Boykoff, M. T., and Boykoff, J. M. (2004). Balance as bias: global warming and the US prestige press. Environmental Science & Policy 7, 125–136.

Boykoff, M. T., and Boykoff, J. M. (2007). Climate change and journalistic norms: a case-study of US mass-media coverage. Geoforum 38, 1190–1204.
| Climate change and journalistic norms: a case-study of US mass-media coverage.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Brouha, P. (1993). The emerging science-based advocacy role of the American Fisheries Society. Journal of the North American Benthological Society 12, 215–218.
| The emerging science-based advocacy role of the American Fisheries Society.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Brown, R. (2017). Policy doctors. Conservation and Hunting 8, 3.

Brussard, P. F., and Tull, J. C. (2007). Conservation biology and four types of advocacy. Conservation Biology 21, 21–24.
| Conservation biology and four types of advocacy.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Bunn, S. E. (2017). Environmental water reform. In ‘Decision Making In Water Resource Policy And Management: An Australian Perspective’. (Eds B. T. Hart, and J. Doolan.) pp. 97–110. (Academic Press: London.)

Calver, M. C. (2000). Lessons from preventative medicine for the precautionary principle and ecosystem health. Ecosystem Health 6, 99–107.
| Lessons from preventative medicine for the precautionary principle and ecosystem health.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Calver, M. C., and King, D. R. (2000). Why publication matters in conservation biology. Pacific Conservation Biology 6, 2–8.
| Why publication matters in conservation biology.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Carney, J. P. (2014). Science advocacy, defined. Science 345, 243.
| Science advocacy, defined.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Chiu, K., Grundy, Q., and Bero, L. (2017). ‘Spin’ in published biomedical literature: a methodological systematic review. PLoS Biology 15, e2002173.
| ‘Spin’ in published biomedical literature: a methodological systematic review.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Clark, M. (2001). Are deepwater fisheries sustainable? – The example of orange roughey (Hoplostethus atlanticus) in New Zealand. Fisheries Research 51, 123–135.
| Are deepwater fisheries sustainable? – The example of orange roughey (Hoplostethus atlanticus) in New Zealand.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Climate Council (2017). Where’s the data? Calls to end government ‘climate censorship’. Available at: https://www.climatecouncil.org.au/climate-censorship [accessed 7 February 2017].

Cook, C. N., Carly, N., Valkan, R. S., Mascia, M. B., and McGeogh, M. A. (2017). Quantifying the extent of protected-area downgrading, downsizing, and degazettement in Australia. Conservation Biology 31, 1039–1052.
| Quantifying the extent of protected-area downgrading, downsizing, and degazettement in Australia.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Corner, A. (2014). IPCC’s outdated climate change communication won’t cut it. The Guardian, Wednesday 14 May 2014. Available at: https://www.theguardian.com/sustainable-business/ipcc-climate-change-science-communication [accessed 6 June 2017].

Curry, J. (2011). Advocacy science and decision making. Available at: https://judithcurry.com/2011/10/13/advocacy-science-and-decision-making/ [accessed 6 June 2017].

Doolan, J., and Hart, B. T. (2017). Water resource policy, planning and management in Australia – an overview. In ‘Decision Making In Water Resource Policy And Management: An Australian Perspective’. (Eds B. T. Hart, and J. Doolan.) pp. 3–19. (Academic Press: London.)

Dudo, A. (2015). Scientists, the media, and the public communication of science. Sociology Compass 9, 761–775.
| Scientists, the media, and the public communication of science.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Fairweather, P. G. (1993). Links between ecology and ecophilosophy, ethics and the requirements of environmental protection. Australian Journal of Ecology 18, 3–19.
| Links between ecology and ecophilosophy, ethics and the requirements of environmental protection.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Fetzer, J. (2004). The personality of science. Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry 379, 901–902.
| The personality of science.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Franck, J., Hughes, D., Szilard, L., Hogness, T., Rabinowitch, E., Seaborg, G., and Nickson, C. J. (1945). A report to the Secretary of War, June 1945. Available at: https://fas.org.sgp/eprint/franck.html [accessed 27 January 2017].

French, R. D. (1975). ‘Antivivisection And Medical Science In Victorian Society.’ (Princeton University Press: Princeton.)

Garrard, G. E., Fidler, F., Wintle, B. C., Chee, Y. E., and Bekessy, S. A. (2016). Beyond advocacy: making space for conservation scientists in public debate. Conservation Letters 9, 208–212.
| Beyond advocacy: making space for conservation scientists in public debate.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Gascoigne, J. (2002). ‘The Enlightenment And The Origins Of European Australia.’ (Cambridge University Press: Cambridge.)

Geiling, N. (2014). Why doesn’t anyone know how to talk about global warming? Available at: http://www.smithsonianmag.com/science-nature/talking-about-climate-change-how-weve-failed-and-how-we-can-fix-it-180951070/ [accessed 2 February 2017].

Gilman, W. (1961). ‘The Language Of Science: A Guide To Effective Writing.’ (English Universities Press: London.)

Greste, P. (2017). ‘The First Casualty: From The Front Lines Of The Global War On Journalism.’ (Viking: Melbourne.)

Hannam, P. (2018). National park ‘at the mercy’ of Murray–Darling Basin water changes. Sydney Morning Herald, Wednesday 21 February 2018. Available at: https://www.smh.com.au/environment/conservation/kinchega-np-at-the-mercy-20180221-p4z15b.html [accessed 26 February 2018].

Hardin, G. (1985). Human ecology: the subversive, conservative science. American Zoologist 25, 469–476.
| Human ecology: the subversive, conservative science.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Herrick, C. N. (2004). Objectivity versus narrative coherence: science, environmental policy, and the U.S. Data Quality Act. Environmental Science & Policy 7, 419–433.
| Objectivity versus narrative coherence: science, environmental policy, and the U.S. Data Quality Act.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Horton, C. C., Peterson, T. R., Banerjee, P., and Peterson, M. J. (2016). Credibility and advocacy in conservation science. Conservation Biology 30, 23–32.
| Credibility and advocacy in conservation science.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Howard, D. (2014). The scientist qua scientist has a duty to advocate and act. Available at: https://donhoward-blog.nd.edu/2014/03/24/the-scientist-qua-scientist-has-a-duty-to-advocate-and-act/#.WJLF_We7r5o [accessed 2 February 2017].

Huertas, A., and Kriegsman, R. (2014). Science or spin?: assessing the accuracy of cable news coverage of climate science. Available at: http://www.ucsusa.org/sites/default/files/legacy/assets/documents/global_warming/Science-or-Spin-report.pdf [accessed 2 February 2017].

Hughes, R. (1994). ‘Culture Of Complaint: The Fraying Of America.’ (Harvill: London.)

Irvine, K. (2012). The tragedy of the threshold: revising perceptions for aquatic conservation. Aquatic Conservation 22, 705–711.
| The tragedy of the threshold: revising perceptions for aquatic conservation.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Jamieson, D., Oreskes, N., and Oppenheimer, M. (2015). Science and policy: crossing the boundary. Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists 71, 53–58.
| Science and policy: crossing the boundary.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Johnson, C. N., Balmford, A., Brook, B. W., Buettel, J. C., Galetti, M., Lei, G. C., and Wilmshurst, J. M. (2017). Biodiversity losses and conservation responses in the Anthropocene. Science 356, 270–275.
| Biodiversity losses and conservation responses in the Anthropocene.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Jungk, R. (1958). ‘Brighter Than A Thousand Suns: A Personal History Of the Atomic Scientists.’ (Harcourt, Brace and Co.: New York.)

Kelly, C., Tumblety, J., and Sheron, N. (2016). Histories of medical lobbying. Lancet 388, 1976–1977.
| Histories of medical lobbying.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Kingsford, R. T. (2013). Australia’s biodiversity conservation crisis – does anyone care? In ‘Grumpy Scientists: The Ecological Conscience Of A Nation’. (Eds D. Lunney, P. Hutchings and H. R. Recher.) pp. 31–38. (Royal Zoological Society of New South Wales: Sydney.)

Klein, N. (2014). ‘This Changes Everything: Capitalism vs The Climate.’ (Allen Lane: London.)

Kolbert, E. (2017). Why facts don’t change our minds. The New Yorker, February 2017. Available at: https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2017/02/27/why-facts-dont-change-our-minds [accessed 15 February 2018].

Lackey, R. T. (2007). Science, scientists, and policy advocacy. Conservation Biology 21, 12–17.
| Science, scientists, and policy advocacy.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Leopold, A. (1970). ‘A Sand Country Almanac With Essays On Conservation From Round River.’ (Ballantine Books: New York.)

Lifton, R. J., and Falk, R. (1982). ‘Indefensible Weapons: The Political And Psychological Case Against Nuclear Weapons.’ (Basic Books: New York.)

Lines, W. J. (2006). ‘Patriots: Defending Australia’s Natural Heritage.’ (University of Queensland Press: Brisbane.)

Lovejoy, T. (2002). Biodiversity: dismissing scientific progress. Scientific American (January), 69–71.

Lubchenco, J. (2017). Environmental science in a post-truth world. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment 15, 3.
| Environmental science in a post-truth world.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Lumb, M. (2013). The 43rd Parliament: traits and trends. Available at: http://www.aph.gov.au/About_Parliament/Parliamentary_Departments/Parliamentary_Library/pubs/rp/rp1314/43rdParl#_Toc368474618 [accessed 30 January 2017].

Marshall, G. (2014). ‘Don’t Even Talk About It: Why Our Brains Are Wired To Ignore Climate Change.’ (Bloomsbury: New York.)

McClenachan, L. (2009). Documenting loss of large trophy fish from the Florida Keys with historical photographs. Conservation Biology 23, 636–643.
| Documenting loss of large trophy fish from the Florida Keys with historical photographs.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

McCoy, E. D. (1996). Advocacy as part of conservation biology. Conservation Biology 10, 919–920.
| Advocacy as part of conservation biology.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

McCright, A. M., and Dunlap, R. E. (2010). Anti-reflexivity: the American conservative movement’s success in undermining climate science and policy. Theory, Culture & Society 27, 100–133.
| Anti-reflexivity: the American conservative movement’s success in undermining climate science and policy.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

McGeogh, P. (2017). Attacks on media no mere outburst. The Age, Tuesday 24 January, p. 14.

McPhee, D. P., Leadbitter, D., and Skilleter, G. A. (2002). Swallowing the bait: is recreational fishing in Australia ecologically sustainable? Pacific Conservation Biology 8, 40–51.
| Swallowing the bait: is recreational fishing in Australia ecologically sustainable?Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Meine, C., Soulé, M., and Noss, R. F. (2006). “A mission-driven discipline”: the growth of conservation biology. Conservation Biology 20, 631–651.
| “A mission-driven discipline”: the growth of conservation biology.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Melbourne Policy Library (2018). Academic freedom of expression policy (MPF1224). Available at: http://policy.unimelb.edu.au/MPF1224 [accessed 14 February 2018].

Miller, R. L. (1986). ‘Under The Cloud: The Decades Of Nuclear Testing.’ (McMillan: New York.)

Millman, O. (2017). Science strikes back: anti-Trump march set to draw thousands to Washington. The Guardian, Tuesday 18 April 2017. Available at: https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2017/apr/18/donald-trumps-march-for-science-washington-climate-change [accessed 6 February 2018].

Muir, C. (2014). ‘The Broken Promise Of Agricultural Progress.’ (Routledge: London.)

Mullon, C., Fréon, P., and Cury, P. (2005). The dynamics of collapse in world fisheries. Fish and Fisheries 6, 111–120.
| The dynamics of collapse in world fisheries.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Nelson, M. P., and Vucetich, J. A. (2009). On advocacy by environmental scientists: what, whether, why, and how. Conservation Biology 23, 1090–1101.
| On advocacy by environmental scientists: what, whether, why, and how.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Nixon, S. W. (1980). Between coastal marshes and coastal waters – a review of twenty years of speculation and research on the role of salt marshes in estuarine productivity and water chemistry. In ‘Estuarine And Wetland Processes’. (Eds P. Hamilton, and K. B. MacDonald.) pp. 437–525. (Plenum: New York.)

Norgaard, K. (2011). ‘Living In Denial.’ (MIT Press: Cambridge, MA.)

Noss, R. F. (1996). Conservation biology, values, and advocacy. Conservation Biology 10, 904.
| Conservation biology, values, and advocacy.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Noss, R. F. (1999). Is there a special conservation biology? Ecography 22, 113–122.
| Is there a special conservation biology?Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

O’Connor, M., and Woodford, F. P. (1978). ‘Writing Scientific Papers In English.’ (Pitman Medical: Tunbridge Wells, UK.)

Odenbaugh, J. (2003). Values, advocacy and conservation biology. Environmental Values 12, 55–69.
| Values, advocacy and conservation biology.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Ogden, L. A. (2015). Minding the media gap. Bioscience 65, 231–236.
| Minding the media gap.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Olson, R. (2009). ‘Don’t be Such A Scientist: Talking Substance In An Age Of Style.’ (Island Press: Washington, DC.)

Olson, R. (2011). If a frond falls in the kelp forest (does it make any sound?). The Pew Oceans Report as a case study of communicating ocean conservation. In ‘Shifting Baselines: The Past And The Future Of Ocean Fisheries’. (Eds B. C. Jackson, K. E. Alexander, and E. Sala.) pp. 33–42. (Island Press: Washington, OR.)

Oreskes, N. (2004). Science and policy: what’s proof got to do with it? Environmental Science & Policy 7, 369–383.
| Science and policy: what’s proof got to do with it?Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Oreskes, N., and Conway, E. M. (2010). ‘Merchants Of Doubt: How A Handful Of Scientists Obscured The Truth On Issues From Tobacco Smoke To Global Warming.’ (Bloomsbury: London.)

Orwell, G. (1968). Politics and the English language. In ‘The Collected Essays, Journalism And Letters Of George Orwell’. (Eds S. Orwell and I. Angos.) Volume 4, pp. 127–140. (Harcourt, Brace, Jovanovich: New York.) [Originally published in Horizon April 1946, London.]

Pauly, D., Christensen, V., Dalsgaard, J., Froese, R., and Torres, F. (1998). Fishing down marine food webs. Science 279, 860–863.
| Fishing down marine food webs.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Pew Oceans Commission (2003). America’s living oceans: charting a course for sea change. Summary Report. Pew Oceans Commission, Arlington, Virginia. Available at: http://www.pewtrusts.org/~/media/assets/2003/06/02/poc_summary.pdf [accessed 2 February 2017].

Pielke, R. A. (2004). When scientists politicize science: making sense of controversy over The Skeptical Environmentalist. Environmental Science & Policy 7, 405–417.
| When scientists politicize science: making sense of controversy over The Skeptical Environmentalist.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Pressey, R. L., Weeks, R., and Gurney, G. G. (2017). From displacement activities to evidence-informed decisions in conservation. Biological Conservation 212, 337–348.
| From displacement activities to evidence-informed decisions in conservation.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Public Health England (2015). ‘Sugar Reduction: The Evidence For Action.’ (Public Health England: London.)

Rhodes, R. (1986). ‘The Making Of The Atomic Bomb.’ (Simon & Schuster: New York.)

Rhodes, R. (1995). ‘Dark Sun: The Making Of The Hydrogen Bomb.’ (Simon & Schuster: New York.)

Rice, J. C. (2011). Food for thought: advocacy science and fisheries decision-making. ICES Journal of Marine Science 68, 2007–2012.
| Food for thought: advocacy science and fisheries decision-making.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Ruddick, G. (2017). Blue Planet II is year’s most-watched British TV show. The Guardian, Tuesday 7 November 2017. Available at: https://www.theguardian.com/media/2017/nov/06/blue-planet-ii-years-most-watched-tv-show-david-attenborough [accessed 16 February 2018].

Runkle, D and Frankel, M.S. (2012). Advocacy in science. Summary of a workshop convened by the American Association for the Advancement of Science, Washington DC, October 17–18, 2011. Available at: https://www.aaas.org/report/workshop-advocacy-science [accessed 6 June 2017].

Sarewitz, D. (2004). How science makes environmental controversies worse. Environmental Science & Policy 7, 385–403.
| How science makes environmental controversies worse.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Schlosberg, D. (2017). On the origins of environmental bullshit. The Conversation, Tuesday 25 July 2017. Available at: http://theconversation.com/on-the-origins-of-environmental-bullshit-80955 [accessed 15 February 2018].

Schweber, S. S. (2000). ‘In The Shadow Of The Bomb: Bethe, Oppenheimer, And The Moral Responsibility Of The Scientist.’ (Princeton University Press: Princeton.)

Scott, J. M., and Rachlow, J. L. (2011). Refocusing the debate about advocacy. Conservation Biology 25, 1–3.
| Refocusing the debate about advocacy.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Scott, J. M., Rachlow, J. L., Lackey, R. T., Pidgorna, A. B., Aycrigg, J. L., Feldman, G. R., Svancara, L. K., Rupp, D. A., Stanish, D. I., and Steinhorst, R. K. (2007). Policy advocacy in science: prevalence, perspectives, and implications for conservation biologists. Conservation Biology 21, 29–35.
| Policy advocacy in science: prevalence, perspectives, and implications for conservation biologists.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Seal, G. (2016). ‘Great Australian Journeys.’ (Allen & Unwin: Sydney.)

Sears, P. B. (1964). Ecology: a subversive subject. Bioscience 14, 11–13.
| Ecology: a subversive subject.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Shepard, P., and McKinley, D. (Eds) (1969). ‘The Subversive Science: Essays Toward An Ecology Of Man.’ (Houghton Mifflin: Boston.)

Shepherd, J. (2018). Blue Planet 2 named the best TV show of 2017 by critics. The Independent, Tuesday 2 January 2018. Available at: http://www.independent.co.uk/arts-entertainment/tv/news/blue-planet-2-best-show-2017-uk-critics-a8137421.html [accessed 16 February 2018].

Shrader-Frechette, K. (1996). Throwing out the bathwater of positivism, keeping the baby of objectivity: relativism and advocacy in conservation biology. Conservation Biology 10, 912–914.
| Throwing out the bathwater of positivism, keeping the baby of objectivity: relativism and advocacy in conservation biology.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Soulé, M. E. (1985). What is conservation biology? Bioscience 35, 727–734.
| What is conservation biology?Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Stauber, J. C., and Rampton, S. (1995). “Democracy” for hire: public relations and environmental movements. The Ecologist 25, 173–180.

Stern, N. (2007). Stern Review: the economics of climate change. Available at: http://www.wwf.se/source.php/1169158/Stern%20Summary_of_Conclusions.pdf. Full report available at http://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/+/http:/www.hm-treasury.gov.uk /independent_reviews/stern_review_economics_climate_change/stern_review_report.cfm [accessed 2 February 2017].

Stoknes, P. E. (2015). ‘What We Think About When We Try Not To Think About Global Warming: Toward A New Psychology Of Climate Action.’ (Chelsea Green: White River Junction.) Available at: http://www.humanimpactsinstitute.org/single-post/2016/06/23/First-Impacts-Hour-Communicating-for-Climate-Action-w-Per-Espen-Stoknes [accessed 6 June 2017].

Strom, M. (2017). Thousands march across Australia for science and reason in public policy. The Sydney Morning Herald, Sunday 23 April 2017. Available at: http://www.smh.com.au/technology/sci-tech/thousands-march-across-australia-for-science-and-reason-in-public-policy-20170422-gvqbbo.html [accessed 6 February 2018].

Strunk, W., Jr (1918). ‘The Elements Of Style.’ (Harcourt, Brace and Co.: New York.)

Strunk, W., Jr, and White, E. B. (2005). ‘The Elements Of Style Illustrated.’ (Penguin: New York.)

Tracy, R. C., and Brussard, P. F. (1996). The importance of science in conservation biology. Conservation Biology 10, 918–919.
| The importance of science in conservation biology.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Vraga, E. (2017). Can March for Science participants advocate without losing the public’s trust? The Conversation, Thursday 20 April 2017. Available at: https://theconversation.com/can-march-for-science-participants-advocate-without-losing-the-publics-trust-76205 [accessed 15 February 2018].

Walker, R. G. (1987). Australia’s ASRB. A case study of political activity and regulatory ‘capture’. Accounting and Business Research 17, 269–286.
| Australia’s ASRB. A case study of political activity and regulatory ‘capture’.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Whitten, T., Holmes, D., and MacKinnon, K. (2001). Conservation biology: a displacement behavior for academia? Conservation Biology 15, 1–3.
| Conservation biology: a displacement behavior for academia?Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Wiens, J. A. (1997). Scientific responsibility and responsible ecology. Conservation Ecology 1, art16.
| Scientific responsibility and responsible ecology.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Wilhere, G. F. (2012). Inadvertent advocacy. Conservation Biology 26, 39–46.
| Inadvertent advocacy.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Woinarski, J. C. Z., Burbidge, A. A., and Harrison, P. L. (2015). Ongoing unraveling of a continental fauna: decline and extinction of Australian mammals since European settlement. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 112, 4531–4540.
| Ongoing unraveling of a continental fauna: decline and extinction of Australian mammals since European settlement.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |