Preliminary observations of dingo responses to assumed aversive stimuli
Rob Appleby A C , Bradley Smith B C , Jess Mackie A , Lilia Bernede A and Darryl Jones A
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations
A Environmental Futures Research Institute, Griffith School of Environment, Griffith University, Nathan, Qld 4111, Australia.
B Appleton Institute, Central Queensland University, School of Human Health and Social Sciences, 44 Greenhill Road, Wayville, SA 5034, Australia.
C Corresponding authors. Email: rob.appleby@wildspy.com.au; b.p.smith@cqu.edu.au
Pacific Conservation Biology 23(3) 295-301 https://doi.org/10.1071/PC17005
Submitted: 11 February 2017 Accepted: 30 July 2017 Published: 15 August 2017
Abstract
Occasionally, interactions between dingoes (Canis dingo) and people on Fraser Island result in serious injury, and, in one case, death. The risk to human safety from such interactions may be mitigated if people could carry a suitably defensive repellent, similar in principle to bear (Ursus spp.) repellent spray advocated in North America. In the first step towards searching for suitable stimuli that might be used as repellents with dingoes, we observed the responses of nine dingoes to three stimuli during interactions with a researcher on Fraser Island. Two treatment stimuli were assumed to be potentially aversive (an air horn blast and a water jet from a motorised water pistol), and one was considered unlikely to be aversive and therefore suitable as a control (a whistle being blown). Responses to the stimuli varied. All nine dingoes were initially presented with the whistle; however, only one adult male responded as if the whistle was aversive. Seven of the nine dingoes were later presented with a whistle and treatment stimuli together. None of the seven dingoes were repelled during any air horn treatment trials; however, six of seven dingoes (all juveniles) were repelled by the water pistol stimulus. Although a water pistol was effective at repelling young dingoes on many occasions, responses between individuals were inconsistent. Results from this pilot study suggest that a water pistol stimulus may offer some protection as a repellent to close approaches by young dingoes, particularly if enhanced with a mild irritant.
Additional keywords: aversive conditioning, Fraser Island, human–wildlife interactions, repellents
References
Allen, B., Boswell, J., and Higginbottom, K. (2012). Fraser Island Dingo Management Strategy Review. Report to Department of Environment and Heritage Protection, Ecosure, West Burleigh.Allen, B., Higginbottom, K., Bracks, J., Davies, N., and Baxter, G. (2015). Balancing dingo conservation with human safety on Fraser Island: the numerical and demographic effects of humane destruction of dingoes. Australasian Journal of Environmental Management 22, 197–215.
| Balancing dingo conservation with human safety on Fraser Island: the numerical and demographic effects of humane destruction of dingoes.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Andelt, W. F., Woolley, T. P., and Hopper, S. N. (1997). Effectiveness of barriers, pyrotechnics, flashing lights, and Scarey Man® for deterring heron predation on fish. Wildlife Society Bulletin (1973–2006) 25, 686–694.
| Effectiveness of barriers, pyrotechnics, flashing lights, and Scarey Man® for deterring heron predation on fish.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Andelt, W. F., Phillips, R. L., Gruver, K. S., and Guthrie, J. W. (1999). Coyote predation on domestic sheep deterred with electronic dog-training collar. Wildlife Society Bulletin (1973–2006) 27, 12–18.
Appleby, R. (2015). Dingo–human conflict: attacks on humans. In ‘The Dingo Debate: Origns, Behaviour and Conservation’. (Ed. B. Smith.) pp. 131–158. (CSIRO Publishing: Melbourne.)
Appleby, R. G., and Jones, D. (2011). Analysis of a preliminary dingo capture–mark–recapture experiment on Fraser Island conducted by the Queensland Parks and Wildlife Service. Environmental Futures Centre, Griffith University.
Appleby, R. G., Mackie, J., Smith, B., Bernede, L., and Jones, D. (2017). Human–dingo interactions on Fraser Island: an analysis of serious incident reports. Australian Mammalogy , .
| Human–dingo interactions on Fraser Island: an analysis of serious incident reports.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Beckmann, J. P., Lackey, C. W., and Berger, J. (2004). Evaluation of deterrent techniques and dogs to alter behavior of “nuisance” black bears. Wildlife Society Bulletin 32, 1141–1146.
| Evaluation of deterrent techniques and dogs to alter behavior of “nuisance” black bears.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Behrendorff, L., Leung, L. K.-P., McKinnon, A., Hanger, J., Belonje, G., Tapply, J., Jones, D., and Allen, B. L. (2016). Insects for breakfast and whales for dinner: the diet and body condition of dingoes on Fraser Island (K’gari). Scientific Reports 6, 23469.
| Insects for breakfast and whales for dinner: the diet and body condition of dingoes on Fraser Island (K’gari).Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BC28XkvVCgtL4%3D&md5=5ca02a3580400faca756c73ea3810ce6CAS |
Blackshaw, J. K., Cook, G. E., Harding, P., Day, C., Bates, W., Rose, J., and Bramham, D. (1990). Aversive responses of dogs to ultrasonic, sonic and flashing light units. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 25, 1–8.
| Aversive responses of dogs to ultrasonic, sonic and flashing light units.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Breck, S. W., Williamson, R., Niemeyer, C., & Shivik, J. A. (2002). Non-lethal radio activated guard for deterring wolf depredation in Idaho: summary and call for research. USDA National Wildlife Research Center, Staff Publications, No. 467.
Burns, G. L., and Howard, P. (2003). When wildlife tourism goes wrong: a case study of stakeholder and management issues regarding dingoes on Fraser Island, Australia. Tourism Management 24, 699–712.
| When wildlife tourism goes wrong: a case study of stakeholder and management issues regarding dingoes on Fraser Island, Australia.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Conover, M. R. (2002). ‘Resolving Human–Wildlife Conflicts: the Science of Wildlife Damage Management.’ (CRC Press: Florida.)
Dale, A. R., Statham, S., Podlesnik, C. A., and Elliffe, D. (2013). The acquisition and maintenance of dogs’ aversion responses to kiwi (Apteryx spp.) training stimuli across time and locations. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 146, 107–111.
| The acquisition and maintenance of dogs’ aversion responses to kiwi (Apteryx spp.) training stimuli across time and locations.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Dale, A. R., Podlesnik, C. A., and Elliffe, D. (2017). Evaluation of an aversion-based program designed to reduce predation of native birds by dogs: an analysis of training records for 1156 dogs. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 191, 59–66.
| Evaluation of an aversion-based program designed to reduce predation of native birds by dogs: an analysis of training records for 1156 dogs.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Darrow, P. A., and Shivik, J. A. (2009). Bold, shy, and persistent: variable coyote response to light and sound stimuli. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 116, 82–87.
| Bold, shy, and persistent: variable coyote response to light and sound stimuli.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
DEHP (2013). Fraser Island dingo conservation and risk management strategy. The Queensland State Government.
Edgar, J. P., Appleby, R. G., and Jones, D. N. (2007). Efficacy of an ultrasonic device as a deterrent to dingoes (Canis lupus dingo): a preliminary investigation. Journal of Ethology 25, 209–213.
| Efficacy of an ultrasonic device as a deterrent to dingoes (Canis lupus dingo): a preliminary investigation.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Fedderwitz, F. (2010). Protecting dogs against attacks by wolves (Canis lupus), with comparison to African wild dogs (Lycaon pictus) and dholes (Cuon alpinus). M.Sc. Thesis, Linköpings Universitet, Sweden. Available at: http://www.diva-portal.org/smash/get/diva2:322325/FULLTEXT01.pdf
Gehring, T. M., Hawley, J. E., Davidson, S. J., Rossler, S. T., Cellar, A. C., Schultz, R. N., Wydeven, A. P., and VerCauteren, K. C. (2006). Are viable non-lethal management tools available for reducing wolf–human conflict? Preliminary results from field experiments. In ‘Proceedings of the 22nd Vertebrate Pest Conference, University of California, Davis’. (Eds. R.M. Timm and J.M. O’Brien) pp. 2–6. (University of California: Davis.)
Gillin, C. M., Hammond, F. M., and Peterson, C. M. (1994). Evaluation of an aversive conditioning technique used on female grizzly bears in the Yellowstone ecosystem. Bears: Their Biology and Management 9, 503–512.
| Evaluation of an aversive conditioning technique used on female grizzly bears in the Yellowstone ecosystem.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Gilsdorf, J. M., Hygnstrom, S. E., and VerCauteren, K. C. (2002). Use of frightening devices in wildlife damage management. Integrated Pest Management Reviews 7, 29–45.
| Use of frightening devices in wildlife damage management.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Greene, R. J. (1982). An application of behavioral technology to the problem of nuisance bears. The Psychological Record 32, 501–511.
| An application of behavioral technology to the problem of nuisance bears.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Greggor, A. L., Clayton, N. S., Phalan, B., and Thornton, A. (2014). Comparative cognition for conservationists. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 29, 489–495.
| Comparative cognition for conservationists.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Harris, C. E., and Knowlton, F. F. (2001). Differential responses of coyotes to novel stimuli in familiar and unfamiliar settings. Canadian Journal of Zoology 79, 2005–2013.
| Differential responses of coyotes to novel stimuli in familiar and unfamiliar settings.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Hawley, J. E., Gehring, T. M., Schultz, R. N., Rossler, S. T., and Wydeven, A. P. (2009). Assessment of shock collars as nonlethal management for wolves in Wisconsin. Journal of Wildlife Management 73, 518–525.
| Assessment of shock collars as nonlethal management for wolves in Wisconsin.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Herrero, S., and Higgins, A. (1998). Field use of capsicum spray as a bear deterrent. Ursus 10, 533–537.
Hunt, C. (1984). Behavioral responses of bears to tests of repellents, deterrents and aversive conditioning. M.Sc. Thesis, University of Montana, Missoula. 137pp.
Koehler, A. E., Marsh, R. E., and Salmon, T. P. (1990). Frightening methods and devices/stimuli to prevent mammal damage – a review. In ‘Proceedings of the Fourteenth Vertebrate Pest Conference’. Paper no. 50. (University of Nebraska: Lincoln.)
Leigh, J., and Chamberlain, M. (2008). Effects of aversive conditioning on behavior of nuisance Louisiana black bears. M.Sc. Thesis, Louisiana State University.
Linhart, S. B. (1984). Strobe light and siren devices for protecting fenced-pasture and range sheep from coyote predation. In ‘Proceedings of the Eleventh Vertebrate Pest Conference’. Paper no. 20. (University of Nebraska: Lincoln.)
Linhart, S. B., Dasch, G. J., Johnson, R. B., Roberts, J. D., and Packham, C. J. (1992). Electronic frightening devices for reducing coyote predation on domestic sheep: efficacy under range conditions and operational use. In ‘Proceedings of the Fifteenth Vertebrate Pest Conference’. Paper no. 47. (University of Nebraska: Lincoln.)
Mazur, R. L. (2010). Does aversive conditioning reduce human–black bear conflict? Journal of Wildlife Management 74, 48–54.
| Does aversive conditioning reduce human–black bear conflict?Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Miller, G. D. (1983). Responses of captive grizzly and polar bears to potential repellents. International Conference on Bear Research & Management 5, 275–279.
Miller, G. D. (1987). Field tests of potential polar bear repellents. Bears: Their Biology and Management 7, 383–390.
| Field tests of potential polar bear repellents.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Penteriani, V., del Mar Delgado, M., Pinchera, F., Naves, J., Fernández-Gil, A., Kojola, I., Härkönen, S., Norberg, H., Frank, J., and Fedriani, J. M. (2016). Human behaviour can trigger large carnivore attacks in developed countries. Scientific Reports 6, .
| Human behaviour can trigger large carnivore attacks in developed countries.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BC28XitFanurc%3D&md5=201ed1a160c73ab6448d093325b45b88CAS |
QPWS (2015). Be dingo safe. Flyer, Queensland Parks and Wildlife Service. Available at: http://www.nprsr.qld.gov.au/parks/fraser/pdf/be-dingo-safe-flyer.pdf.
Rogers, L. L. (1984). Reactions of free-ranging black bears to capsaicin spray repellent. Wildlife Society Bulletin 12, 59–61.
Rossler, S. T., Gehring, T. M., Schultz, R. N., Rossler, M. T., Wydeven, A. P., and Hawley, J. E. (2012). Shock collars as a site-aversive conditioning tool for wolves. Wildlife Society Bulletin 36, 176–184.
| Shock collars as a site-aversive conditioning tool for wolves.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Schultz, R. N., Jonas, K. W., Skuldt, L. H., and Wydeven, A. P. (2005). Experimental use of dog-training shock collars to deter depredation by gray wolves. Wildlife Society Bulletin 33, 142–148.
| Experimental use of dog-training shock collars to deter depredation by gray wolves.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Séquin, E. S., Jaeger, M. M., Brussard, P. F., and Barrett, R. H. (2003). Wariness of coyotes to camera traps relative to social status and territory boundaries. Canadian Journal of Zoology 81, 2015–2025.
| Wariness of coyotes to camera traps relative to social status and territory boundaries.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Shivik, J. A. (2006). Tools for the edge: what’s new for conserving carnivores. Bioscience 56, 253–259.
| Tools for the edge: what’s new for conserving carnivores.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Shivik, J. A., Treves, A., and Callahan, P. (2003). Nonlethal techniques for managing predation: primary and secondary repellents. Conservation Biology 17, 1531–1537.
| Nonlethal techniques for managing predation: primary and secondary repellents.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Smith, M. E., Linnell, J. D., Odden, J., and Swenson, J. E. (2000). Review of methods to reduce livestock depredation II. Aversive conditioning, deterrents and repellents. Acta Agriculturae Scandinavica, Section A-Animal Science 50, 304–315.
| Review of methods to reduce livestock depredation II. Aversive conditioning, deterrents and repellents.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Smith, T. S., Herrero, S., Debruyn, T. D., and Wilder, J. M. (2008). Efficacy of bear deterrent spray in Alaska. Journal of Wildlife Management 72, 640–645.
| Efficacy of bear deterrent spray in Alaska.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Whittaker, D., and Knight, R. L. (1998). Understanding wildlife responses to humans. Wildlife Society Bulletin 26, 312–317.
Windberg, L. A. (1996). Coyote responses to visual and olfactory stimuli related to familiarity with an area. Canadian Journal of Zoology 74, 2248–2253.
| Coyote responses to visual and olfactory stimuli related to familiarity with an area.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
