Enhancing legal frameworks for biodiversity conservation in the Pacific
Erika J. Techera
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations
Faculty of Law and the Oceans Institute, University of Western Australia, 35 Stirling Highway, Crawley, WA 6008, Australia. Email: erika.techera@uwa.edu.au
Pacific Conservation Biology 21(1) 87-96 https://doi.org/10.1071/PC14906
Submitted: 8 January 2014 Accepted: 17 July 2014 Published: 21 April 2015
Abstract
The Pacific region is a biodiversity hot spot with a long history of human occupation closely linked with sustainable use of the marine environment. The health of the marine environment and its resources is of environmental, economic and socio-cultural concern, and law plays an important part in its conservation and management. Designing appropriate legal mechanisms is, however, a challenging prospect. The Pacific Island countries involve a complex environment for law and policy-makers. As a result of their colonial past, these nations are legally pluralist, with more than one legal system operating at the same time. In addition, Pacific Island countries have embraced international law, ratifying the majority of key environmental treaties and subsequently taking steps to implement their obligations, including those related to biodiversity conservation. This complicated legal landscape means that law and policy must be adopted that implements international treaties whilst also meeting the needs of local communities. A particular feature of the Pacific region is the widespread adoption of community-based marine management approaches. Their proliferation is due to a combination of underlying customary law, which has subsisted despite colonial rule, together with a willingness by governments to support local approaches. This article examines community-based marine management through a legal lens; it commences by outlining traditional rules for marine management before exploring the contemporary legal position with a focus on the hybridisation of state-based legislation and customary law. Finally, comments are made on the effectiveness of these legal approaches, as well as remaining challenges.
Additional keywords: collaboration, community-based management, customary law, environmental law, Pacific Island states.
References
Aalbersberg, B., Tawake, A., and Parras, T. (2005). Village by village: recovering Fiji’s coastal fisheries. In ‘The Wealth of the Poor: Managing Ecosystems to Fight Poverty’. (Ed. G. Mock.) pp. 144–151. (World Resources Institute: Washington, DC.)Apple, R. A., and Kikuchi, W. K. (1975). Ancient Hawai‘i shore zone fishponds: an evaluation of survivors for historical restoration. Office of the State Director, National Park Service, US Department of the Interior, Honolulu, Hawai‘i.
Berkes, F. (2012). ‘Sacred Ecology.’ 3rd edn. (Routledge: London.)
Beurier, J., Zakovska, K., and Guilloux, B. (2009). Final report on legal aspects related to the valorization of marine active substances: marine biodiversity law in Fiji, Vanuatu and Solomon Islands. CRISP, Nouméa, New Caledonia.
Boer, B. (Ed.) (1996). Environmental law in the South Pacific: consolidated report of the reviews of environmental law in the Cook Islands, Federated States of Micronesia, Kingdom of Tonga, Republic of the Marshall Islands and Solomon Islands. IUCN, Gland, Switzerland, and Cambridge, UK.
Bracey, D. H. (2006). ‘Exploring Law and Culture.’ (Waveland Press: Illinois, USA.)
Brown, K. (1999). Customary law in the Pacific: an endangered species? Journal of South Pacific Law 3. Available at: www.vanuatu.usp.ac.fj/journal_splaw/articles/Brown1.htm [accessed 30 December 2013].
Clarke, P., and Gillespie, C. T. (2008). ‘Legal Mechanisms for the Establishment and Management of Terrestrial Protected Areas in Fiji.’ (IUCN: Suva, Fiji.)
Clarke, P., and Jupiter, S. D. (2010). Law, custom and community-based natural resource management in Kubulau District (Fiji). Environmental Conservation 37, 98–106.
| Law, custom and community-based natural resource management in Kubulau District (Fiji).Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Corrin Care, J. (2000). The status of customary law in Fiji Islands after the Constitutional Amendment Act 1997. Journal of South Pacific Law 37. Available at: http://www.vanuatu.usp.ac.fj/journal_splaw/articles/Corrin1.htm [accessed 2 January 2014].
Corrin Care, J., and Paterson, D. (2007). ‘Introduction to South Pacific Law.’ 2nd edn. (Routledge: Oxford.)
Cuskelly, K. (2011). ‘Customs and Constitutions: State Recognition of Customary Law around the World.’ (IUCN: Bangkok.)
Dudley, N. (Ed.) (2008). ‘Guidelines for Applying Protected Area Management Categories.’ (IUCN: Gland, Switzerland.)
FAO (2012). State of the world’s fisheries and aquaculture 2012. FAO Fisheries and Aquaculture Department, Rome.
Forsyth, M. (2007). A typology of relationships between state and non-state justice systems. Journal of Legal Pluralism and Unofficial Law 39, 67–112.
| A typology of relationships between state and non-state justice systems.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Friedlander, A., Poepoe, K., Poepoe, K., Helm, K., Bartram, P., Maragos, J., and Abbott, I. (2000). Application of Hawaiian traditions to community-based fishery management. In ‘Proceedings of the 9th International Coral Reef Symposium, Bali, Indonesia’. 2, 23–27.
Garrett, J. (2013). Fears for Pacific tuna stocks amid record 2012 catch. Australia Network News. Available at: http://www.abc.net.au/news/2013-08-14/an-pac-fishing-record/4887054 [accessed 28 December 2013].
Gillett, R., and Cartwright, I. (2010). ‘The Future of Pacific Island Fisheries.’ (SPC: Nouméa, New Caledonia; FFA: Honiara, Solomon Islands.)
Govan, H., and Jupiter, S. (2013). Can the IUCN 2008 protected areas management categories support Pacific Island approaches to conservation? PARKS 19, 73–80.
| Can the IUCN 2008 protected areas management categories support Pacific Island approaches to conservation?Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Govan, H., Tawake, A., Tabunakawai, K., Jenkins, A., Lasgorceix, A., Schwarz, A.-M., Aalbersberg, B., Manele, B., Vieux, C., Notere, D., Afzal, D., Techera, E., Rasalato, E. T., Sykes, H., Walton, H., Tafea, H., Korovulavula, I., Comley, J., Kinch, J., Feehely, J., Petit, J., Heaps, L., Anderson, P., Cohen, P., Ifopo, P., Vave, R., Hills, R., Tawakelevu, S., Alefaio, S., Meo, S., Troniak, S., Malimali, S., Kukuian, S., George, S., Tauaefa, T., and Obed, T. (2009). Status and potential of locally-managed marine areas in the South Pacific: meeting nature conservation and sustainable livelihood targets through wide-spread implementation of LMMAs. Suva, Fiji: SPREP/WWF/WorldFish-Reefbase/CRISP.
Griffiths, J. (1986). What is legal pluralism? Journal of Legal Pluralism and Unofficial Law 18, 1–55.
| What is legal pluralism?Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Hickey, F. R. (2003). Traditional marine resource management in Vanuatu: worldviews in transformation; sacred and profane. In ‘Putting Fishers’ Knowledge to Work’. (Eds N. Haggan, C. Brignall and L. Wood.) pp. 117–137. Fisheries Centre Research Report, UBC, Vancouver, Canada.
Hoffmann, T. C. (2002). The reimplementation of the Ra’ui: coral reef management in Rarotonga, Cook Islands. Coastal Management 30, 401–418.
| The reimplementation of the Ra’ui: coral reef management in Rarotonga, Cook Islands.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Hviding, E. (2003). Both sides of the beach: knowledges of nature in Oceania. In ‘Nature Across Cultures: Views of Nature and the Environment in Non-western Cultures’. (Ed. H. Selin.) pp. 245–276. (Kluwer: Dordrecht, Netherlands.)
Johannes, R. E. (1978). Traditional marine conservation methods in Oceania and their demise. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 9, 349–364.
| Traditional marine conservation methods in Oceania and their demise.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Johannes, R. E. (1998). Government-supported, village-based management of marine resources in Vanuatu. Ocean and Coastal Management 40, 165–186.
| Government-supported, village-based management of marine resources in Vanuatu.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Jupiter, S. D., Cohen, P. J., Weeks, R., Tawake, A., and Govan, H. (2014a). Locally-managed marine areas: multiple objectives and diverse strategies. Pacific Conservation Biology 20, 165–179.
Jupiter, S. D., Jenkins, A. P., Lee Long, W. J., Maxwell, S. L., Carruthers, T. J. B., Hodge, K. B., Govan, H., Tamelander, J., and Watson, J. E. M. (2014b). Principles for integrated island management in the tropical Pacific. Pacific Conservation Biology 20, 193–205.
Keppel, G., Morrison, C., Meyer, J.-Y., and Boehmer, H. J. (2014). Isolated and vulnerable: the history and future of Pacific Island terrestrial biodiversity. Pacific Conservation Biology 20, 136–145.
Kinch, J., Anderson, P., Richards, E., Talouli, A., Vieux, C., Peteru, C., and Suaesi, T. (2010). Outlook report on the state of the marine biodiversity in the Pacific region. Secretariat of the Pacific Regional Environment Programme, Apia, Samoa.
Kingsford, R. T., Watson, J. E. M., Lundquist, C. J., Venter, O., Hughes, L., et al. (2009). Major conservation policy issues for biodiversity in Oceania. Conservation Biology 23, 834–840.
| Major conservation policy issues for biodiversity in Oceania.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:STN:280:DC%2BD1MrgsVersQ%3D%3D&md5=6ff0ae3e930007903179ee92f37b1b19CAS | 19627315PubMed |
Lane, M. B. (2008). Strategic coastal governance issues in Fiji: the challenges of integration. Marine Policy 32, 856–866.
| Strategic coastal governance issues in Fiji: the challenges of integration.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Law Reform Commission of Western Australia (2006). Aboriginal customary laws. Final Report.
Lees, A. (2007). Review and analysis of Fiji’s conservation sector. Final report. Austral Foundation. Available at: http://www.australfoundation.org/uploads/9/8/3/5/9835787/final_report_pdf_lees.pdf [accessed 1 January 2014].
Lindsay, J. (1998). Designing legal space: law as an enabling tool in community-based management. Paper presented at the International CBNRM Workshop, 10–14 May 1998. Washington, DC.
Llewell, D. (2004). Customary law on Malo, South Santo, Vanuatu and the protection of the marine environment. In ‘Tabus or Not Taboos? How to Use Traditional Environmental Knowledge to Support Sustainable Development of Marine Resources in Melanesia’. (Eds A. Caillaud, S. Boengkih, E. Evans-Illidge, J. Genolagani, P. Havemann, D. Henao, E. Kwa, D. Llewell, A. Ridep-Morris, J. Rose, R. Nari, P. Skelton, R. South, R. Sulu, A. Tawake, B. Tobin, S. Tuivanuavou and C. Wilkinson.) pp. 22–23. SPC Traditional Marine Resource Management and Knowledge Information Bulletin 17, 14–35. Available at: http://www.spc.int/DigitalLibrary/Doc/FAME/InfoBull/TRAD/17/TRAD17_15_Nari.pdf [accessed 3 January 2014].
Merry, S. E. (1988). Legal pluralism. Law & Society Review 22, 869–896.
| Legal pluralism.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Meyer, J.-Y. (2014). Research and management of invasive plants in the Pacific Islands: “état de l’art”, critical issues and new challenges in rapidly changing ecosystems. Pacific Conservation Biology 20, 146–164.
Mills, M., Jupiter, S. D., Pressey, R. L., Ban, N. C., and Comley, J. (2011). Incorporating effectiveness of community-based management strategies in a national marine gap analysis for Fiji. Conservation Biology 25, 1155–1164.
| Incorporating effectiveness of community-based management strategies in a national marine gap analysis for Fiji.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 21978136PubMed |
Nari, R. (2004). Merging traditional resource management approaches and practices with the formal legal system in Vanuatu. In ‘Tabus or Not Taboos? How to Use Traditional Environmental Knowledge to Support Sustainable Development of Marine Resources in Melanesia’. (Eds A. Caillaud, S. Boengkih, E. Evans-Illidge, J. Genolagani, P. Havemann, D. Henao, E. Kwa, D. Llewell, A. Ridep-Morris, J. Rose, R. Nari, P. Skelton, R. South, R. Sulu, A. Tawake, B. Tobin, S. Tuivanuavou and C. Wilkinson.) pp. 15–16. SPC Traditional Marine Resource Management and Knowledge Information Bulletin 17, 14–35. Available at: http://www.spc.int/DigitalLibrary/Doc/FAME/InfoBull/TRAD/17/TRAD17_15_Nari.pdf [accessed 3 January 2014].
New Zealand Law Commission (2006). Converging currents: custom and human rights in the Pacific. New Zealand Law Commission, Wellington.
Ntumy, M. A. (ed) (1993). ‘South Pacific Islands Legal Systems.’ (University of Hawai‘i Press: Honolulu.)
Powles, G. (1997). Common law at bay? The scope and status of customary law regimes in the Pacific. Journal of Pacific Studies 21, 61–82.
Ruddle, K. (1994). ‘A Guide to the Literature on Traditional Community-based Fishery Management in the Asia–Pacific Tropics.’ (FAO: Rome.)
Ruddle, K., Hviding, E., and Johannes, R. E. (1992). Marine resource management in the context of customary tenure. Marine Resource Economics 7, 249–273.
Sullivan, P. M. (1998). Customary revolutions: the law of custom and the conflict of traditions in Hawai‘i. University of Hawai‘i Law Review 20, 99–163.
Techera, E. J. (2005). Protected area management in Vanuatu. Macquarie Journal of International and Comparative Environmental Law 2, 107–119.
Techera, E. J. (2006). Samoa: law, custom and conservation. New Zealand Journal of Environmental Law 10, 361–379.
Techera, E. (2012). ‘Marine Environmental Governance: From International Law to Local Practice.’ (Routledge: Abingdon, UK.)
Techera, E. J., and Troniak, S. (2009). Marine protected areas policy and legislation gap analysis: Fiji Islands. IUCN Regional Office for Oceania, Suva, Fiji.
Thaman, R. (2014). Agrodeforestation and the loss of agrobiodiversity in the Pacific Islands: a call for conservation. Pacific Conservation Biology 20, 180–192.
Veitayaki, J. (1997). Traditional marine resource management practices used in the Pacific Islands: an agenda for change. Ocean and Coastal Management 37, 123–136.
| Traditional marine resource management practices used in the Pacific Islands: an agenda for change.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Vierros, M., Tawake, A., Hickey, F., Tiraa, A., and Noa, R. (2010). Traditional marine management areas of the Pacific in the context of national and international law and policy. United Nations University, Traditional Knowledge Initiative, Darwin, Australia.
von Benda-Beckmann, F. (2001). Folk, indigenous and customary law. In ‘International Encyclopaedia of the Social and Behavioral Sciences’. (Eds N. J. Smelser and P. B. Baltes.) pp. 5705–5708. (Elsevier: Oxford.)
Vukikomoala, K., Jupiter, S., Erasito, E., and Chand, K. (2012). An analysis of international law, national legislation, judgements, and institutions as they interrelate with territories and areas conserved by indigenous peoples and local communities. Report No. 19, Fiji. Natural Justice and Kalpavriksh, Bangalore and Delhi.
Ward, G. R., and Kingdon, E. (Eds) (1995). ‘Land, Custom and Practice in the South Pacific.’ (Cambridge University Press: Cambridge.)
Watson, I. (1997). Indigenous peoples’ law-ways: survival against the colonial state. Australian Feminist Law Journal 8, 39–58.
| Indigenous peoples’ law-ways: survival against the colonial state.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
World Database on Protected Areas. (undated). Protected Planet. IUCN and UNEP, Cambridge. Available at: http://protectedplanet.net/ [accessed 1 January 2014].
