Determining the effect of stocking rate on the spatial distribution of cattle for the subtropical savannas
N. W. Tomkins A D , P. J. O’Reagain B , D. Swain A , G. Bishop-Hurley C and E. Charmley AA CSIRO Livestock Industries, PO Box 5545 Rockhampton MC, Qld 4702, Australia.
B Queensland Department of Primary Industries and Fisheries, PO Box 976 Charters Towers, Qld 4820, Australia.
C CSIRO, ICT Centre, PO Box 883, Kenmore, Qld 4069, Australia.
D Corresponding author. Email: nigel.tomkins@csiro.au
The Rangeland Journal 31(3) 267-276 https://doi.org/10.1071/RJ07070
Submitted: 12 December 2007 Accepted: 10 November 2008 Published: 28 August 2009
Abstract
With the commercial development of the global positioning system (GPS), it is now possible to monitor the distribution of free ranging cattle and derive measures to describe landscape use. Animal GPS data can be integrated with a geographic information system (GIS) detailing topography, vegetation, soil type and other landscape features. Combining GPS and GIS information is useful for understanding how animals respond to spatial variability. This study quantified land-type preferences for Brahman cross steers over three time periods, from October 2004 to March 2006 in a replicated trial, under heavy (4 ha/AE; animal equivalent of ~450 kg steer) and light (8 ha/AE) stocking in four, ~105 ha paddocks of subtropical semi-arid savanna near Charters Towers, Queensland, Australia. The grazing trail was conducted at a scale much less than would be found in commercial situations. Consequently, the spatial pattern of cattle reported here may not represent what occurs at a commercial scale and implications are discussed. Results were analysed in terms of the spatial distribution of steers fitted with GPS devices in each of the four paddocks and for each stocking rate to provide insight into cattle distribution and land-type preferences. Steers walked in excess of 6 km per day, regardless of stocking rate, and exhibited diurnal patterns of movement, with peak activity around dawn (0500–0700 hours) and dusk (1800–2000 hours). The spatial distribution of the collared steers was not uniform and appeared to be strongly influenced by the prevailing drought conditions and location of water points within each paddock. A hierarchy of drivers for distribution was identified. With the exception of drinking water location, land subtype based on soil-vegetation associations influenced animal distribution. Preference indices (ŵi) indicated that steers selected sites associated with heavy clay and texture contrast soils dominated by Eucalyptus coolabah Blakely & Jacobs (ŵi = 5.33) and Eucalyptus brownii Maiden & Cambage (ŵi = 3.27), respectively, and avoiding Eucalyptus melanophloia F.Muell. ridges (ŵi = 0.26) and Eucalyptus cambageana Maiden (ŵi = 0.12) on sodosols. The results suggest that spatial variation in cattle distribution within a paddock may be more critical than overall stocking rate in influencing the pattern of biomass utilisation. However, to quantifying the effects of different grazing land management practices on animal distribution on a commercial scale, additional studies in extensive paddocks are required.
Additional keywords: foraging, GPS, landscape, selection indices, rangelands.
Acknowledgements
This work was funded in part by Meat and Livestock Australia (MLA). We are grateful to the Lyons family, Wambiana for allowing the work to be conducted on their property. The authors would like to thank John Bushell, Chris Holloway and the late Peter Allen who provided valuable assistance with collar deployments. Sam Williams programmed collars and processed data. We are indebted to Christina Playford for statistical advice and data analysis. Dave Masters, David Wilcox and two anonymous reviewers provided constructive comments on the manuscript.
Ash A. J.,
McIvor J. G.,
Mott J. J., Andrew M. H.
(1997) Building grass castles: integrating ecology and management of Australia’s tropical tallgrass rangelands. The Rangeland Journal 19, 123–144.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Ash A. J., Stafford Smith D. M.
(1996) Evaluating stocking rate impacts in rangelands: animals don’t practice what we preach. The Rangeland Journal 18, 216–243.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Bailey D. W.,
Gross J. E.,
Laca E. A.,
Rittenhouse L. R.,
Coughenour M. B.,
Swift D. M., Sims P. L.
(1996) Mechanisms that result in large herbivore grazing distribution patterns. Journal of Range Management 49, 386–400.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Bowyer R. T., Bleich V. C.
(1984) Effects of cattle grazing on selected habitats of southern mule deer. California Fish and Game 70, 240–270.
Boyce M. S.,
Vernier P. R.,
Nielsen S. E., Schmiegelow F. K.
(2002) Evaluating resource selection functions. Ecological Modelling 157, 281–300.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
D’Eon R. G., Delparte D.
(2005) Effects of radio-collar position and orientation on GPS radio-collar performance, and the implications of PDOP in data screening. Journal of Applied Ecology 42, 383–388.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Ganskopp D.
(2001) Manipulating cattle distribution with salt and water in large arid-land pastures: a GPS/GIS assessment. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 73, 251–262.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | PubMed |
Graetz R. D., Ludwig J. A.
(1978) A method for the analysis of piosphere data applicable to range assessment. Australian Rangeland Journal 1, 126–136.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Hobbs N. T., Bowden D. C.
(1982) Confidence intervals on food preference indices. Journal of Wildlife Management 46, 505–507.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Hodder R. M., Low W. A.
(1978) Grazing distribution of free-ranging cattle at three sites in the Alice Springs district, Central Australia. Australian Rangelands Journal 1, 95–105.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Hunt L. P.,
Petty S.,
Cowley R.,
Fisher A.,
Ash A. J., MacDonald N.
(2007) Factors affecting the management of cattle grazing distribution in northern Australia: preliminary observations on the effect of paddock size and water points. The Rangeland Journal 29, 169–179.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Lange R. T.
(1969) The piosphere: sheep track and dung patterns. Journal of Range Management 22, 396–401.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Langvatn R., Hanley T. A.
(1993) Feeding-patch choice by red deer in relation to foraging efficiency. Oecologia 95, 164–170.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Low W. A.,
Dudzinski M. L., Muller W. J.
(1981a) The influence of forage and climatic conditions on range community preference of shorthorn cattle in central Australia. Journal of Applied Ecology 18, 11–26.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Low W. A.,
Tweedie R. L.,
Edwards C. B.,
Hodder R. M.,
Malafant K. W., Cunningham R. B.
(1981b) The influence of environment on daily maintenance behaviour of free-ranging shorthorn cows in central Australia. I, General introduction and descriptive analysis of day-long activities. Applied Animal Ethology 7, 11–26.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Parsons A. J.,
Schwinning S., Carrere P.
(2001) Plant growth functions and possible spatial and temporal scaling errors in models of herbivory. Grass and Forage Science 56, 21–34.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Pickup G.
(1994) Modelling patterns of defoliation by grazing animals in rangelands. Journal of Applied Ecology 31, 231–246.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Pringle H. J., Landsberg J.
(2004) Predicting the distribution of livestock grazing pressure in rangelands. Austral Ecology 29, 31–39.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Rempel R. S.,
Rodgers A. R., Abraham K. F.
(1995) Performance of a GPS animal location system under boreal forest canopy. Journal of Wildlife Management 59, 543–551.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Rushton S.,
Ormerod S., Kerby G.
(2004) New paradigms for modelling species distributions. Journal of Applied Ecology 41, 193–200.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Schlecht E.,
Hulsebusch C.,
Mahler F., Becker K.
(2004) The use of differentially corrected global positioning system to monitor activities of cattle at pasture. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 85, 185–202.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Schwager M.,
Anderson D.,
Butler S., Rus D.
(2007) Robust classification of animal tracking data. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture 56, 46–59.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Tomkins N., O’Reagain P.
(2007) Global positioning systems indicate landscape preferences of cattle in the subtropical savannas. The Rangeland Journal 29, 217–222.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Townshend J. R.
(1994) Global data sets for land applications from the advanced very high resolution radiometer: an introduction. International Journal of Remote Sensing 15, 3319–3332.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Turner L. W.,
Udal M. C.,
Larson B. T., Shearer S. A.
(2000) Monitoring cattle behaviour and pasture use with GPS and GIS. Canadian Journal of Animal Science 80, 405–413.
Wade G. W.,
Schultz B. W.,
Wickham J. D., Bradford D. F.
(1998) Modelling the potential spatial distribution of beef cattle grazing using a geographic information system. Journal of Arid Environments 38, 325–334.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Wilmshurst J. F.,
Fryxell J. M., Hudson R. J.
(1995) Forage quality and patch choice by Wapiti (C. elephus). Behavioral Ecology 6, 209–217.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |