Channelling Edwin Chadwick: beyond utopian thinking in urban planning policy and health
Stephen J. CorbettA School of Public Health, University of Sydney
B Centre for Population Health, Sydney West Area Health Service
C Corresponding author. Email: stephen_corbett@wsahs.nsw.gov.au
NSW Public Health Bulletin 18(10) 195-197 https://doi.org/10.1071/NB07095
Published: 26 September 2007
Abstract
Health impact assessment is advanced as a formal means to assess the direct and indirect health impacts of urban planning decisions and processes. It is, however, an intrinsically passive policy device. A more comprehensive and practical policy framework or architecture, reminiscent of that devised by Edwin Chadwick and the sanitary reform movement in 19th Century England, will be necessary to reorient the goals and practices of urban planning.
[1]
[2]
[3]
[4]
[5]
[6]
[7]
[8]
[9]
[10]
[11]
[12]
[13] Corbett SJ. A ministry for the public’s health: an imperative for disease prevention in the 21st century? Med J Aust 2005; 183(5): 254–7.
| PubMed |
[14]
[15]
[16]
[17] Mackenbach JP. Thomas More, Etienne Cabet and the Paradoxes of Utopian Thinking. Eur J Public Health 2004; 14(2): 113.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | PubMed |
[18] Alderslade R. The Public Health Act of 1848. BMJ 1998; 317(7158): 549–50.
| PubMed |