ROWLEY REVIEW. Phylogeography: its development and impact in Australo-Papuan ornithology with special reference to paraphyly in Australian birds
Leo Joseph A C and Kevin E. Omland BA Australian National Wildlife Collection, CSIRO Sustainable Ecosystems, GPO Box 284, Canberra, ACT 2601, Australia.
B Department of Biological Sciences, University of Maryland, Baltimore County, 1000 Hilltop Circle, Baltimore, MD 21250, USA.
C Corresponding author. Email: leo.joseph@csiro.au
Emu 109(1) 1-23 https://doi.org/10.1071/MU08024
Submitted: 12 May 2008 Accepted: 18 September 2008 Published: 20 January 2009
Abstract
With examples from Australo-Papuan ornithology, we examine the technical and theoretical roots of molecular phylogeography and review its development. We describe the progression from ad hoc interpretation of gene trees in single species phylogeographic studies through to comparative phylogeography and currently advocated model-testing approaches. Mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) sequences have provided most advances to date, although we demonstrate and advocate the future use of multilocus datasets analysed with coalescent methods. We examine interrelationships among speciation research, historical biogeography, phylogeography and landscape genetics. Mitochondrial paraphyly, in which individuals of one species or population have mtDNA that is more closely related to that of another than to their own, emerges in 44% of Australian studies to date as a common, important result in Australian avian phylogeography. Accordingly, we explore at length its most common causes and its impact on case studies in Australo-Papuan avian phylogeography. The impact of so much paraphyly on avian phylogeography and taxonomy is a major theme of the review. We suggest a full research agenda for avian phylogeography in the Australo-Papuan region that spans diverse topics: the need for more studies of pelagic birds, spatio-temporal links between New Guinea and Australia, island populations, testing of long-established biogeographical hypotheses, and integration of molecular and non-molecular datasets into integrated evolutionary understanding of species and populations. Studying the full continuum of divergences from landscape genetics, to phylogeography, to recently diverged species with evidence of paraphyly, to highly divergent species with many fixed differences will lead to a more complete understanding of the processes and patterns of avian evolution.
Acknowledgements
We especially thank Scott Edwards for his detailed comments on two drafts. We also thank Gaynor Dolman, Michael Double, and anonymous reviewers for critically commenting on a draft, and David Winkler for discussion. We thank our colleagues and collaborators for their help in many projects,especially J. Peters and T. Wilke. Kevin E. Omland (KEO) is funded by an US National Science Foundation, Systematics Program CAREER Grant (DEB – 0347083). KEO’s contribution was made while on sabbatical leave at the Australian National University, Canberra, supported by a Visiting Fellowship from the School of Botany and Zoology (BoZo). KEO thanks William Foley, Andrew Cockburn, Mike Crisp, and other members of the Crisp Laboratory and BoZo for interesting discussions. Responsibility for views expressed, of course, lies with L. Joseph and K. E. Omland.
Abbott, I. (1974). The avifauna of Kangaroo Island and causes of its impoverishment. Emu 74, 124–134.
Avise, J. C. , and Aquadro, C. F. (1982). A comparative summary of genetic distances in vertebrates. Evolutionary Biology 15, 151–185.
Christidis, L. , Horton, P. , and Norman, J. (2008). Subspeciation in the Short-tailed Grasswren (Amytornis merrotsyi, Maluridae). Emu 108, 275–282.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
de Queiroz, K. (2007). Species concepts and species delimitation. Systematic Biology 56, 879–886.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | PubMed |
Ho, S. Y. W. (2007). Calibrating molecular estimates of substitution rates and divergence times in birds. Journal of Avian Biology 38, 409–414.
Joseph, L. (2008b). Book Review: Systematics and Taxonomy of Australian Birds by Les Christidis and Walter E. Boles. Emu 108, 365–368.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Nicholls, J. A. , and Austin, J. J. (2005). Phylogeography of an east Australian wet-forest bird, the satin bowerbird (Ptilonorhynchus violaceus), derived from mtDNA, and its relationship to morphology. Molecular Ecology 14, 1485–1496.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | CAS | PubMed |
Palumbi, S. R. , and Cipriano, F. (1998). Species identification using genetic tools: the value of nuclear and mitochondrial gene sequences in whale conservation. Journal of Heredity 89, 459–464.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | CAS | PubMed |
Rand, D. M. (2001). The units of selection on mitochondrial DNA. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 32, 415–448.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Ruegg, K. , Hijmans, R. J. , and Moritz, C. (2006). Climate change and the origin of migratory pathways in the Swainson’s Thrush, Catharus ustulatus. Journal of Biogeography 33, 1172–1182.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Sharman, G. B. , Close, R. L. , and Maynes, G. M. (1989). Chromosome evolution, phylogeny and speciation of rock wallabies (Petrogale : Macropodidae). Australian Journal of Zoology 37, 351–363.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Zink, R. M. (2004). The role of subspecies in obscuring avian biological diversity and misleading conservation policy. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences 271, 561–564.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
![](../../media/share/OpenURL_Image.gif)
Zink, R. M. , and Barrowclough, G. (2008). Mitochondrial DNA under siege in avian phylogeography. Molecular Ecology 17, 2107–2121.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | CAS | PubMed |
![](../../media/share/OpenURL_Image.gif)
Zink, R. M. , and McKay, B. (2008). Book Review: Speciation in Birds by Trevor Price. Auk 125, 504–505.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
![](../../media/share/OpenURL_Image.gif)