Register      Login
Emu Emu Society
Journal of BirdLife Australia
EDITORIAL

Cooperative breeding beyond kinship: why else do helpers help?

Paul G. McDonald
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations

Behavioural and Physiological Ecology Research Centre, Zoology, School of Environmental and Rural Science, University of New England, Armidale, NSW 2351, Australia. Email: paul.mcdonald@une.edu.au

Emu 114(2) 91-96 https://doi.org/10.1071/MUv114n2_ED
Submitted: 11 December 2012  Accepted: 13 December 2013   Published: 9 May 2014

Additional keywords: cooperation, group augmentation, inclusive fitness theory, kin selection theory, social prestige.


References

Abbot, P., Abe, J., Alcock, J., Alizon, S., Alpedrinha, J. A. C., Andersson, M., Andre, J.-B., van Baalen, M., Balloux, F., Balshine, S., Barton, N., Beukeboom, L. W., et al (2011). Inclusive fitness theory and eusociality. Nature 471, E1–E4.
Inclusive fitness theory and eusociality.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Arnold, K. E., Owens, I. P. F., and Goldizen, A. W. (2005). Division of labour within cooperatively breeding groups. Behaviour 142, 1577–1590.
Division of labour within cooperatively breeding groups.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Beck, N. R., Peakall, R., and Heinsohn, R. G. (2008). Social constraint and an absence of sex-biased dispersal drive fine-scale genetic structure in white-winged choughs. Molecular Ecology 17, 4346–4358.
Social constraint and an absence of sex-biased dispersal drive fine-scale genetic structure in white-winged choughs.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Bergmüller, R., Johnstone, R. A., Russell, A. F., and Bshary, R. (2007). Integrating cooperative breeding into theoretical concepts of cooperation. Behavioural Processes 76, 61–72.
Integrating cooperative breeding into theoretical concepts of cooperation.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Blouin, M. S. (2003). DNA-based methods for pedigree reconstruction and kinship analysis in natural populations. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 18, 503–511.
DNA-based methods for pedigree reconstruction and kinship analysis in natural populations.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Blumstein, D. T., Mennill, D. J., Clemins, P., Girod, L., Yao, K., Patricelli, G., Deppe, J. L., Krakauer, A. H., Clark, C., Cortopassi, K. A., Hanser, S. F., McCowan, B., Ali, A. M., and Kirschel, A. N. G. (2011). Acoustic monitoring in terrestrial environments using microphone arrays: applications, technological considerations and prospectus. Journal of Applied Ecology 48, 758–767.
Acoustic monitoring in terrestrial environments using microphone arrays: applications, technological considerations and prospectus.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Boeckle, M., Szipl, G., and Bugnyar, T. (2012). Who wants food? Individual characteristics in raven yells. Animal Behaviour 84, 1123–1130.
Who wants food? Individual characteristics in raven yells.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Bonadonna, F., and Sanz-Aguilar, A. (2012). Kin recognition and inbreeding avoidance in wild birds: the first evidence for individual kin-related odour recognition. Animal Behaviour 84, 509–513.
Kin recognition and inbreeding avoidance in wild birds: the first evidence for individual kin-related odour recognition.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Browning, L. E., Patrick, S. C., Rollins, L. A., Griffith, S. C., and Russell, A. F. (2012). Kin selection, not group augmentation, predicts helping in an obligate cooperatively breeding bird. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London – B. Biological Sciences 279, 3861–3869.
Kin selection, not group augmentation, predicts helping in an obligate cooperatively breeding bird.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Carlisle, T. R., and Zahavi, A. (1986). Helping at the nest, allofeeding and social status in immature Arabian Babblers. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 18, 339–351.
Helping at the nest, allofeeding and social status in immature Arabian Babblers.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Clutton-Brock, T. H. (2002). Breeding together: kin selection and mutualism in cooperative vertebrates. Science 296, 69–72.
Breeding together: kin selection and mutualism in cooperative vertebrates.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Clutton-Brock, T. (2009). Cooperation between non-kin in animal societies. Nature 462, 51–57.
Cooperation between non-kin in animal societies.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Cockburn, A. (1998). Evolution of helping behavior in cooperatively breeding birds. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 29, 141–177.
Evolution of helping behavior in cooperatively breeding birds.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Cockburn, A. (2007). Solitary obsession or menage a trois, but cooperative breeding is never a two-party game. Behavioural Processes 76, 106–108.
Solitary obsession or menage a trois, but cooperative breeding is never a two-party game.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Cornwallis, C. K., West, S., and Griffin, A. S. (2009). Routes to indirect fitness in cooperatively breeding vertebrates: kin discrimination and limited dispersal. Journal of Evolutionary Biology 22, 2445–2457.
Routes to indirect fitness in cooperatively breeding vertebrates: kin discrimination and limited dispersal.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Croft, D. P., James, R., and Krause, J. (2008). ‘Exploring Animal Social Networks.’ (Princeton University Press: Princeton, NJ.)

Dall, S. R. X., Giraldeau, L. A., Olsson, O., McNamara, J. M., and Stephens, D. W. (2005). Information and its use by animals in evolutionary ecology. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 20, 187–193.
Information and its use by animals in evolutionary ecology.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Darwin, C. (1859). ‘On the Origin of Species.’ (John Murray: London.)

Double, M. C., Dawson, D., Burke, T., and Cockburn, A. (1997). Finding the fathers in the least faithful bird: a microsatellite-based genotyping system for the Superb Fairy-wren Malurus cyaneus. Molecular Ecology 6, 691–693.
Finding the fathers in the least faithful bird: a microsatellite-based genotyping system for the Superb Fairy-wren Malurus cyaneus.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Doutrelant, C., and Covas, R. (2007). Helping has signalling characteristics in a cooperatively breeding bird. Animal Behaviour 74, 739–747.
Helping has signalling characteristics in a cooperatively breeding bird.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Dow, D. D., and Whitmore, M. J. (1990). Noisy Miners: variations on the theme of communality. In ‘Cooperative Breeding in Birds: Long Term Studies of Ecology and Behaviour’. (Eds P. B. Stacey, W. D. Koenig.) pp. 559–592. (Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK.)

Durrant, K. L., and Hughes, J. M. (2005). Differing rates of extra-group paternity between two populations of the Australian Magpie (Gymnorhina tibicen). Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 57, 536–545.
Differing rates of extra-group paternity between two populations of the Australian Magpie (Gymnorhina tibicen).Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Emlen, S. T. (1995). An evolutionary theory of family. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 92, 8092–8099.
An evolutionary theory of family.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Emlen, S. T., and Wrege, P. H. (1988). The role of kinship in helping decisions among White-fronted Bee-Eaters. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 23, 305–315.
The role of kinship in helping decisions among White-fronted Bee-Eaters.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Fawcett, T. W., Hamblin, S., and Giraldeau, L.-A. (2013). Exposing the behavioral gambit: the evolution of learning and decision rules. Behavioral Ecology 24, 2–11.
Exposing the behavioral gambit: the evolution of learning and decision rules.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Gonzalez, J.-C. T., Sheldon, B. C., and Tobias, J. A. (2013). Environmental stability and the evolution of cooperative breeding in hornbills. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London – B. Biological Sciences 280, 20131297.
Environmental stability and the evolution of cooperative breeding in hornbills.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Griesser, M., Barnaby, J., Schneider, N. A., Figenschau, N., Wright, J., Griffith, S. C., Kazem, A., and Russell, A. F. (2009). Influence of winter ranging behaviour on the social organization of a cooperatively breeding bird species, the Apostlebird. Ethology 115, 888–896.
Influence of winter ranging behaviour on the social organization of a cooperatively breeding bird species, the Apostlebird.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Hamilton, W. D. (1964a). The genetical evolution of social behaviour. I. Journal of Theoretical Biology 7, 1–16.
The genetical evolution of social behaviour. I.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Hamilton, W. D. (1964b). The genetical evolution of social behaviour. II. Journal of Theoretical Biology 7, 17–52.
The genetical evolution of social behaviour. II.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Hatchwell, B. J. (2009). The evolution of cooperative breeding in birds: kinship, dispersal and life history. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological Sciences 364, 3217–3227.
The evolution of cooperative breeding in birds: kinship, dispersal and life history.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Jamieson, I. G. (1991). The unselected hypothesis for the evolution of helping behavior: too much or too little emphasis on natural selection? American Naturalist 138, 271–282.
The unselected hypothesis for the evolution of helping behavior: too much or too little emphasis on natural selection?Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Jetz, W., and Rubenstein, D. R. (2011). Environmental uncertainty and the global biogeography of cooperative breeding in birds. Current Biology 21, 72–78.
Environmental uncertainty and the global biogeography of cooperative breeding in birds.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Kennedy, R. A. W., Evans, C. S., and McDonald, P. G. (2009). Individual distinctiveness in the mobbing call of a cooperative bird, the noisy miner Manorina melanocephala. Journal of Avian Biology 40, 481–490.
Individual distinctiveness in the mobbing call of a cooperative bird, the noisy miner Manorina melanocephala.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Kingma, S. A., Hall, M. L., and Peters, A. (2011). Multiple benefits drive helping behavior in a cooperatively breeding bird: an integrated analysis. American Naturalist 177, 486–495.
Multiple benefits drive helping behavior in a cooperatively breeding bird: an integrated analysis.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Lehmann, L., and Keller, L. (2006). The evolution of cooperation and altruism – a general framework and a classification of models. Journal of Evolutionary Biology 19, 1365–1376.
The evolution of cooperation and altruism – a general framework and a classification of models.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Margraf, N., and Cockburn, A. (2013). Helping behaviour and parental care in fairy-wrens (Malurus). Emu 113, 294–301.
Helping behaviour and parental care in fairy-wrens (Malurus).Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Marshall, J. A. R. (2011). Group selection and kin selection: formally equivalent approaches. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 26, 325–332.
Group selection and kin selection: formally equivalent approaches.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Maynard Smith, J. (1964). Group selection and kin selection. Nature 201, 1145–1147.
Group selection and kin selection.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

McDonald, P. G. (2012). Cooperative bird differentiates between the calls of different individuals, even when vocalizations were from completely unfamiliar individuals. Biology Letters 8, 365–368.
Cooperative bird differentiates between the calls of different individuals, even when vocalizations were from completely unfamiliar individuals.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

McDonald, P. G., and Wright, J. (2011). Bell miner provisioning calls are more similar among relatives and are used by helpers at the nest to bias their effort towards kin. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London – B. Biological Sciences 278, 3403–3411.
Bell miner provisioning calls are more similar among relatives and are used by helpers at the nest to bias their effort towards kin.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

McDonald, P. G., Kazem, A. J. N., and Wright, J. (2007). A critical analysis of ‘false-feeding’ behaviour in a cooperatively breeding bird: disturbance effects, satiated nestlings or deception? Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 61, 1623–1635.
A critical analysis of ‘false-feeding’ behaviour in a cooperatively breeding bird: disturbance effects, satiated nestlings or deception?Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

McDonald, P. G., Kazem, A. J. N., Clarke, M. F., and Wright, J. (2008). Helping as a signal: does removal of potential audiences alter helper behavior in the bell miner? Behavioral Ecology 19, 1047–1055.
Helping as a signal: does removal of potential audiences alter helper behavior in the bell miner?Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

McDonald, P. G., Kazem, A. J. N., and Wright, J. (2009). Cooperative provisioning dynamics: fathers and unrelated helpers show similar responses to manipulations of begging. Animal Behaviour 77, 369–376.
Cooperative provisioning dynamics: fathers and unrelated helpers show similar responses to manipulations of begging.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

McNamara, J. M., and Houston, A. I. (2009). Integrating function and mechanism. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 24, 670–675.
Integrating function and mechanism.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Mehdiabadi, N. J., Jack, C. N., Farnham, T. T., Platt, T. G., Kalla, S. E., Shaulsky, G., Queller, D. C., and Strassmann, J. E. (2006). Kin preference in a social microbe. Nature 442, 881–882.
Kin preference in a social microbe.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Nomano, F. Y., Browning, L. E., Rollins, L. A., Nakagawa, S., Griffith, S. C., and Russell, A. F. (2013). Feeding nestlings does not function as a signal of social prestige in cooperatively breeding chestnut-crowned babblers. Animal Behaviour 86, 277–289.
Feeding nestlings does not function as a signal of social prestige in cooperatively breeding chestnut-crowned babblers.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Nowak, M. A., Tarnita, C. E., and Wilson, E. O. (2010). The evolution of euscociality. Nature 466, 1057–1062.
The evolution of euscociality.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Okasha, S. (2006). ‘Evolution and the Levels of Selection.’ (Oxford University Press: New York.)

Pacheco, M. L., McDonald, P. G., Wright, J., Kazem, A. J. N., and Clarke, M. F. (2008). Helper contributions to antiparasite behavior in the cooperatively breeding Bell Miner. Behavioral Ecology 19, 558–566.
Helper contributions to antiparasite behavior in the cooperatively breeding Bell Miner.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Põldmaa, T., Montgomerie, R., and Boag, P. (1995). Mating system of the cooperatively breeding Noisy Miner Manorina melanocephala, as revealed by DNA profiling. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 37, 137–143.
Mating system of the cooperatively breeding Noisy Miner Manorina melanocephala, as revealed by DNA profiling.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Queller, D. C., and Strassmann, J. E. (1998). Kin selection and social insects. Bioscience 48, 165–175.
Kin selection and social insects.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Ridley, A. R. (2007). Factors affecting offspring survival and development in a cooperative bird: social, maternal and environmental effects. Journal of Animal Ecology 76, 750–760.
Factors affecting offspring survival and development in a cooperative bird: social, maternal and environmental effects.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Rollins, L.-A., Browning, L. E., Holleley, C. E., Savage, J. L., Russell, A. F., and Griffith, S. C. (2012). Building genetic networks using relatedness information: a novel approach for the estimation of dispersal and characterization of group structure in social animals. Molecular Ecology 21, 1727–1740.
Building genetic networks using relatedness information: a novel approach for the estimation of dispersal and characterization of group structure in social animals.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Russell, A. F., Langmore, N. E., Cockburn, A., Astheimer, L. B., and Kilner, R. M. (2007). Reduced egg investment can conceal helper effects in cooperatively breeding birds. Science 317, 941–944.
Reduced egg investment can conceal helper effects in cooperatively breeding birds.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Sorato, E., Gullett, P. R., Griffith, S. C., and Russell, A. F. (2012). Effects of predation risk on foraging behaviour and group size: adaptations in a social cooperative species. Animal Behaviour 84, 823–834.
Effects of predation risk on foraging behaviour and group size: adaptations in a social cooperative species.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Tinbergen, N. (1963). On aims and methods of Ethology. Zeitschrift für Tierpsychologie 20, 410–433.
On aims and methods of Ethology.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

West, S. A., Griffin, A. S., and Gardner, A. (2007). Social semantics: altruism, cooperation, mutualism, strong reciprocity and group selection. Journal of Evolutionary Biology 20, 415–432.
Social semantics: altruism, cooperation, mutualism, strong reciprocity and group selection.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

West, S. A., El Mouden, C., and Gardner, A. (2011). Sixteen common misconceptions about the evolution of cooperation in humans. Evolution and Human Behavior 32, 231–262.
Sixteen common misconceptions about the evolution of cooperation in humans.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Woolfenden, G. E., and Fitzpatrick, J. W. (1978). The inheritance of territory in group-breeding birds. Bioscience 28, 104–108.
The inheritance of territory in group-breeding birds.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Wright, J. (2007). Cooperation theory meets cooperative breeding: exposing some ugly truths about social prestige, reciprocity and group augmentation. Behavioural Processes 76, 142–148.
Cooperation theory meets cooperative breeding: exposing some ugly truths about social prestige, reciprocity and group augmentation.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Wright, J., McDonald, P. G., te Marvelde, L., Kazem, A. J. N., and Bishop, C. (2010). Helping effort increases with relatedness in bell miners, but ‘unrelated’ helpers of both sexes still provide substantial care. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London – B. Biological Sciences 277, 437–445.
Helping effort increases with relatedness in bell miners, but ‘unrelated’ helpers of both sexes still provide substantial care.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Zahavi, A. (1977). Reliability in communication systems and the evolution of altruism. In ‘Evolutionary Ecology’. (Eds B. Stonehouse, C. Perrins.) pp. 253–259. (University Park Press: Baltimore, MD.)