Do chemical cues in the venom of slow lorises repel avian predators?
G. Fuller A B , V. Nijman A D , W. Wirdateti C and K. A. I. Nekaris AA Oxford Brookes University, Department of Social Sciences, Gipsy Lane, Oxford 1X3 0BP, UK.
B Center for Zoo Animal Welfare, Detroit Zoological Society, 8450 W. 10 Mile Road, Royal Oak, MI 48067, USA.
C Division Zoology, Research Center for Biology, Lembaga Ilmu Pengetahuan Indonesia (LIPI), Gedung Widyasatwaloka, Jakarta-Bogor, Indonesia.
D Corresponding author. Email: vnijman@brookes.ac.uk
Emu 116(4) 435-439 https://doi.org/10.1071/MU16033
Submitted: 3 February 2016 Accepted: 25 April 2016 Published: 9 June 2016
Abstract
Raptors are confirmed predators of Asian slow lorises (Nycticebus spp.), the only primates with a toxic bite. A possible function of this venom is to protect against predators. Slow lorises release volatile chemicals when threatened, thus potentially communicating their venomous status towards predators. Crested Serpent-eagles (Spilornis cheela) and Changeable Hawk-eagles (Nisaetus cirrhatus) are known to prey on venomous snakes and small mammals and are potential predators of slow lorises. We tested the anti-predator potential of slow loris venom by presenting pieces of chicken combined with swabs of Greater Slow Loris (Nycticebus coucang) venom to 10 Changeable Hawk-eagles and 5 Crested Serpent-eagles. The eagles showed few behavioural responses in reaction to slow loris venom, examining swabs with venom or control scents equally. Both eagle species did show higher rates of face-rubbing behaviour following consumption of foods paired with venom compared with control scents. Our data suggest that slow loris venom does not function to repel avian predators, but may have an anti-predator defence function. While the eagles are not repelled by the smell of slow lorises, contact with their venom causes discomfort, potentially limiting the palatability of slow lorises to eagles.
Additional keywords: chemosensory behaviour, Indonesia, Nisaetus cirrhatus, Spilornis cheela, venomous mammal.
References
Alterman, L. (1995). Toxins and toothcombs: potential allospecific chemical defenses in Nycticebus and Perodicticus. In ‘Creatures of the Dark’. (Eds L. Alterman, G. Doyle and M. K. Izard.) pp. 413–424. (Springer: US.)Caro, T. (2005). ‘Antipredator Defences in Birds and Mammals.’ (University of Chicago Press: Chicago.)
Cobb, S. (1968). The size of the olfactory bulb in 108 species of birds. The Auk 85, 55–61.
| The size of the olfactory bulb in 108 species of birds.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Cuthill, I. C., Partridge, J. C., Bennett, A. T., Church, S. C., Hart, N. S., and Hunt, S. (2000). Ultraviolet vision in birds. Advances in the Study of Behavior 29, 159–214.
| Ultraviolet vision in birds.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Eisner, T., and Grant, R. P. (1981). Toxicity, odor aversion, and olfactory aposematism. Science 213, 476.
| Toxicity, odor aversion, and olfactory aposematism.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:STN:280:DyaL3M3isFymsg%3D%3D&md5=6b709d220ddc15cd380d508c3daeee41CAS | 7244647PubMed |
Evans, D. L., and Waldbauer, G. P. (1982). Behavior of adult and naive birds when presented with a bumblebee and its mimic. Zeitschrift für Tierpsychologie 59, 247–259.
| Behavior of adult and naive birds when presented with a bumblebee and its mimic.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Ferguson-Lees, J., and Christie, D. A. (2001). ‘Raptors of the World.’ (Christopher Helm: London.)
Gohli, J., and Hogstedt, G. (2009). Explaining the evolution of warning coloration: secreted secondary defence chemicals may facilitate the evolution of visual aposematic signals. PLoS One 4, e5779.
| Explaining the evolution of warning coloration: secreted secondary defence chemicals may facilitate the evolution of visual aposematic signals.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 19492013PubMed |
Grow, N. B., Wirdateti, , and Nekaris, K. A. I. (2015). Does toxic defence in Nycticebus spp. relate to ectoparasites? The lethal effects of slow loris venom on arthropods. Toxicon 95, 1–5.
| Does toxic defence in Nycticebus spp. relate to ectoparasites? The lethal effects of slow loris venom on arthropods.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BC2cXitFOntbjJ&md5=5c7d635b913932e6a3c6159f80523697CAS | 25528386PubMed |
Hagey, L. R., Fry, B. G., and Fitch-Snyder, H. (2007). Talking defensively: a dual use for the brachial gland exudate of slow and pygmy lorises. In ‘Primate Anti-Predator Strategies’. (Eds S. Gursky and K.A.I. Nekaris) pp. 251–270. (Springer: New York.)
Jones, M. P., Pierce, K. E., and Ward, D. (2007). Avian vision: a review of form and function with special consideration to birds of prey. Journal of Exotic Pet Medicine 16, 69–87.
| Avian vision: a review of form and function with special consideration to birds of prey.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Ligabue-Braun, R., Verli, H., and Carlini, C. R. (2012). Venomous mammals: a review. Toxicon 59, 680–695.
| Venomous mammals: a review.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BC38XlvFWqurY%3D&md5=86a122298f45482912d32d7ae1719c93CAS | 22410495PubMed |
Madani, G., and Nekaris, K. A. I. (2014). Anaphylactic shock following the bite of a wild Kayan slow loris (Nycticebus kayan): implications for slow loris conservation. The Journal of Venomous Animals and Toxins Including Tropical Diseases 20, 43.
| Anaphylactic shock following the bite of a wild Kayan slow loris (Nycticebus kayan): implications for slow loris conservation.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 25309586PubMed |
Martin, G. R. (2012). Through birds’ eyes: insights into avian sensory ecology. Journal für Ornithologie 153, 23–48.
| Through birds’ eyes: insights into avian sensory ecology.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Naoroji, R. (2007). ‘Birds of Prey on the Indian Subcontinent.’ (Om Books International: New Delhi.)
Nekaris, K. A. I., Pimley, E. R., and Ablard, K. M. (2007). Predator defense by slender lorises and pottos. In ‘Primate Anti-Predator Strategies’. (Eds S. Gursky and K.A.I. Nekaris.) pp. 220–238. (Springer: New York.)
Nekaris, K. A. I., Moore, R. S., Rode, E. J., and Fry, B. G. (2013). Mad, bad and dangerous to know: the biochemistry, ecology and evolution of slow loris venom. Journal of Venomous Animals and Toxins including Tropical Diseases 19, 21.
| Mad, bad and dangerous to know: the biochemistry, ecology and evolution of slow loris venom.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Nijman, V. (2004). Habitat segregation in two congeneric hawk-eagles (Spizaetus bartelsi and S. cirrhatus) in Java, Indonesia. Journal of Tropical Ecology 20, 105–111.
| Habitat segregation in two congeneric hawk-eagles (Spizaetus bartelsi and S. cirrhatus) in Java, Indonesia.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Orosz, S. E., and Lichtenberger, M. (2011). Avian respiratory distress: etiology, diagnosis, and treatment. The Veterinary Clinics of North America. Exotic Animal Practice 14, 241–255.
| Avian respiratory distress: etiology, diagnosis, and treatment.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 21601813PubMed |
Rice, W. R. (1982). Acoustical location of prey by the marsh hawk: adaptation to concealed prey. The Auk 99, 403–413.
Rode-Margono, J. E., and Nekaris, K. A. I. (2015). Cabinet of curiosities: venom systems and their ecological function in mammals, with a focus on primates. Toxins 7, 2639–2658.
| Cabinet of curiosities: venom systems and their ecological function in mammals, with a focus on primates.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 26193318PubMed |
Rowe, C., and Halpin, C. (2013). Why are warning displays multimodal? Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 67, 1425–1439.
| Why are warning displays multimodal?Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Sano, K. (2012). Crested serpent eagle Kanmuri-Washi (Jpn) Spilornis cheela. Bird Research News 9, 4–5.
Skelhorn, J., and Rowe, C. (2006). Predator avoidance learning of prey with secreted or stored defences and the evolution of insect defences. Animal Behaviour 72, 827–834.
| Predator avoidance learning of prey with secreted or stored defences and the evolution of insect defences.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Sody, H. J. V. (1989). Diet of Javanese birds. In ‘Henri Jacob Victor Sody (1892–1959), his life and work’. (Ed. J.H. Becking.) pp. 164–221 (Brill: Leiden.)
Weldon, P. J., and McNease, L. (1991). Does the American alligator discriminate between venomous and nonvenomous snake prey. Herpetologica 47, 403–406.