Comparison of point counts and automated acoustic monitoring: detecting birds in a rainforest biodiversity survey
Elliot C. Leach A D , Chris J. Burwell A B , Louise A. Ashton C , Darryl N. Jones A and Roger L. Kitching A
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations
A Environmental Futures Research Institute, Griffith University, Nathan, Qld 4111, Australia.
B Biodiversity Program, Queensland Museum, South Brisbane, Qld 4101, Australia.
C Soil Biodiversity Group, Life Sciences Department, Natural History Museum, Cromwell Road, London SW7 5BD, UK.
D Corresponding author. Email: elliot.leach@griffithuni.edu.au
Emu 116(3) 305-309 https://doi.org/10.1071/MU15097
Submitted: 22 September 2015 Accepted: 26 January 2016 Published: 5 April 2016
Abstract
To monitor assemblages of animals, ecologists need effective methods for detecting and recording the distributions of species within target areas in restricted periods of time. In this study, we compared the effectiveness of a traditional avian biodiversity assessment technique (point counts) with a relatively new method (automated acoustic recordings) along an elevational gradient in rainforest in central Queensland, Australia. On average, point counts detected more species than acoustic recordings of an equivalent length of time (n = 40, P = <0.001). We suggest these results are driven by the visual detection of additional species during point counts. Despite the fact that point counts detected more species than acoustic recordings, datasets generated by both methods showed similar patterns in the community response to change in elevation. There was significant overlap in the species detected using both methods, but each detected several unique species. Consequently, we recommend the use of both techniques in tandem for future biodiversity assessments, as their respective strengths and weaknesses are complementary.
Additional keywords: Eungella National Park, point counts, rainforest bird diversity.
References
Acevedo, M. A., Corrada-Bravo, C. J., Corrada-Bravo, H., Villanueva-Rivera, L. J., and Aide, T. M. (2009). Automated classification of bird and amphibian calls using machine learning: a comparison of methods. Ecological Informatics 4, 206–214.| Automated classification of bird and amphibian calls using machine learning: a comparison of methods.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Anderson, A. S. (2011) Influences of the past, present and future climate on the structure and diversity of rainforest bird assemblages in north-eastern Australia. Ph.D. Thesis, James Cook University, Townsville
Anderson, A. S., Storlie, C. J., Shoo, L. P., Pearson, R. G., and Williams, S. E. (2013). Current analogues of future climate indicate the likely response of a sensitive montane tropical avifauna to a warming world. PLoS One 8, e69393.
| Current analogues of future climate indicate the likely response of a sensitive montane tropical avifauna to a warming world.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BC3sXht1yqtbbL&md5=f69b29d77538ca1c13aca9de94acb3d4CAS | 23936005PubMed |
Bregman, T. P., Şekercioğlu, Ç. H., and Tobias, J. A. (2014). Global patterns and predictors of bird species responses to forest fragmentation: implications for ecosystem function and conservation. Biological Conservation 169, 372–383.
| Global patterns and predictors of bird species responses to forest fragmentation: implications for ecosystem function and conservation.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Buxton, R. T., and Jones, I. L. (2012). Measuring nocturnal seabird activity and status using acoustic recording devices: applications for island restoration. Journal of Field Ornithology 83, 47–60.
| Measuring nocturnal seabird activity and status using acoustic recording devices: applications for island restoration.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Cai, J., Ee, D., Pham, B., Roe, P., and Zhang, J. (2007) Sensor network for the monitoring of ecosystem: bird species recognition. Available at http://eprints.qut.edu.au/11227/1/11227a.pdf [Verified 9 March 2016].
Celis-Murillo, A., Deppe, J. L., and Allen, M. F. (2009). Using soundscape recordings to estimate bird species abundance, richness, and composition. Journal of Field Ornithology 80, 64–78.
| Using soundscape recordings to estimate bird species abundance, richness, and composition.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Celis-Murillo, A., Deppe, J. L., and Ward, M. P. (2012). Effectiveness and utility of acoustic recordings for surveying tropical birds. Journal of Field Ornithology 83, 166–179.
| Effectiveness and utility of acoustic recordings for surveying tropical birds.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Clarke, K. R., and Gorley, R. N. (2006) ‘PRIMER v6: User Manual/Tutorial.’ (Primer-E Ltd.: Plymouth)
Digby, A., Towsey, M., Bell, B. D., and Teal, P. D. (2013). A practical comparison of manual and autonomous methods for acoustic monitoring. Methods in Ecology and Evolution 4, 675–683.
| A practical comparison of manual and autonomous methods for acoustic monitoring.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Farnsworth, A., and Russell, R. W. (2007). Monitoring flight calls of migrating birds from an oil platform in the northern Gulf of Mexico. Journal of Field Ornithology 78, 279–289.
| Monitoring flight calls of migrating birds from an oil platform in the northern Gulf of Mexico.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Garnett, S., and Franklin, D. (Eds) (2014) ‘Climate Change Adaptation Plan for Australian Birds.’ (CSIRO Publishing: Melbourne, Vic.)
Goyette, J. L., Howe, R. W., Wolf, A. T., and Robinson, W. D. (2011). Detecting tropical nocturnal birds using automated audio recordings. Journal of Field Ornithology 82, 279–287.
| Detecting tropical nocturnal birds using automated audio recordings.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Grava, T., Mathevon, N., Place, E., and Balluet, P. (2008). Individual acoustic monitoring of the European Eagle Owl Bubo bubo. The Ibis 150, 279–287.
| Individual acoustic monitoring of the European Eagle Owl Bubo bubo.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Haselmayer, J., and Quinn, J. S. (2000). A comparison of point counts and sound recording as bird survey methods in Amazonian southeast Peru. The Condor 102, 887–893.
| A comparison of point counts and sound recording as bird survey methods in Amazonian southeast Peru.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Hobson, K. A., Rempel, R. S., Hamilton, G., Turnbull, B., and Van Wilgenburg, S. L. (2002). Acoustic surveys of birds using electronic recordings: new potential from an omnidirectional microphone system. Wildlife Society Bulletin 30, 709–720.
Holmes, S. B., McIlwrick, K. A., and Venier, L. A. (2014). Using automated sound recording and analysis to detect bird species-at-risk in southwestern Ontario woodlands. Wildlife Society Bulletin 38, 591–598.
| Using automated sound recording and analysis to detect bird species-at-risk in southwestern Ontario woodlands.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Kitching, R., Putland, D., Ashton, L. A., Laidlaw, M. J., Boulter, S., Christensen, H. S., and Lambkin, C. L. (2011). Detecting biodiversity changes along climatic gradients: the IBISCA-Queensland Project. Memoirs of the Queensland Museum: Nature 55, 235–250.
Klingbeil, B. T., and Willig, M. R. (2015). Bird biodiversity assessments in temperate forest: the value of point count versus acoustic monitoring protocols. PeerJ 3, e973.
| Bird biodiversity assessments in temperate forest: the value of point count versus acoustic monitoring protocols.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 26038728PubMed |
Laiolo, P. (2010). The emerging significance of bioacoustics in animal species conservation. Biological Conservation 143, 1635–1645.
| The emerging significance of bioacoustics in animal species conservation.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Laiolo, P., Vögeli, M., Serrano, D., and Tella, J. L. (2007). Testing acoustic versus physical marking: two complementary methods for individual-based monitoring of elusive species. Journal of Avian Biology 38, 672–681.
| Testing acoustic versus physical marking: two complementary methods for individual-based monitoring of elusive species.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
McGuire, A., Johnston, G., Robertson, J., and Kleindorfer, S. (2011). Comparison of survey methods for detection of the elusive Western Whipbird Psophodes nigrogularis with notes on its distribution. South Australian Ornithologist 37, 49–59.
Mennill, D. J. (2011). Individual distinctiveness in avian vocalizations and the spatial monitoring of behaviour. The Ibis 153, 235–238.
| Individual distinctiveness in avian vocalizations and the spatial monitoring of behaviour.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Mennill, D. J., Battiston, M., Wilson, D. R., Foote, J. R., and Doucet, S. M. (2012). Field test of an affordable, portable, wireless microphone array for spatial monitoring of animal ecology and behaviour. Methods in Ecology and Evolution 3, 704–712.
| Field test of an affordable, portable, wireless microphone array for spatial monitoring of animal ecology and behaviour.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Osmun, A. E., and Mennill, D. J. (2011). Acoustic monitoring reveals congruent patterns of territorial singing behaviour in male and female tropical wrens. Ethology 117, 385–394.
| Acoustic monitoring reveals congruent patterns of territorial singing behaviour in male and female tropical wrens.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Rempel, R. S., Hobson, K. A., Holborn, G., Van Wilgenburg, S. L., and Elliott, J. (2005). Bioacoustic monitoring of forest songbirds: interpreter variability and effects of configuration and digital processing methods in the laboratory. Journal of Field Ornithology 76, 1–11.
| Bioacoustic monitoring of forest songbirds: interpreter variability and effects of configuration and digital processing methods in the laboratory.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Rempel, R. S., Francis, C. M., Robinson, J. N., and Campbell, M. (2013). Comparison of audio recording system performance for detecting and monitoring songbirds. Journal of Field Ornithology 84, 86–97.
| Comparison of audio recording system performance for detecting and monitoring songbirds.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Sedláček, O., Vokurková, J., Ferenc, M., Djomo, E. N., Albrecht, T., and Hořák, D. (2015). A comparison of point counts with a new acoustic sampling method: a case study of a bird community from the montane forests of Mount Cameroon. Ostrich 86, 213–220.
| A comparison of point counts with a new acoustic sampling method: a case study of a bird community from the montane forests of Mount Cameroon.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Şekercioğlu, Ç. H., Schneider, S. H., Fay, J. P., and Loarie, S. R. (2008). Climate change, elevational range shifts, and bird extinctions. Conservation Biology 22, 140–150.
| Climate change, elevational range shifts, and bird extinctions.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 18254859PubMed |
Thomas, L., and Marques, T. A. (2012). Passive acoustic monitoring for estimating animal density. Acoustics Today 8, 35–44.
| Passive acoustic monitoring for estimating animal density.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Tracey, J. G. (1982) ‘The Vegetation of the Humid Tropical Region of North Queensland.’ (CSIRO: Melbourne, Vic.)
Venier, L. A., Holmes, S. B., Holborn, G. W., McIlwrick, K. A., and Brown, G. (2012). Evaluation of an automated recording device for monitoring forest birds. Wildlife Society Bulletin 36, 30–39.
| Evaluation of an automated recording device for monitoring forest birds.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Wimmer, J., Towsey, M., Roe, P., and Williamson, I. (2013). Sampling environmental acoustic recordings to determine bird species richness. Ecological Applications 23, 1419–1428.
| Sampling environmental acoustic recordings to determine bird species richness.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 24147413PubMed |
Zwart, M. C., Baker, A., McGowan, P. J. K., and Whittingham, M. J. (2014). The use of automated bioacoustic recorders to replace human wildlife surveys: an example using nightjars. PLoS One 9, e102770.
| The use of automated bioacoustic recorders to replace human wildlife surveys: an example using nightjars.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 25029035PubMed |