The effects of nest usurpation and other interference by the Blue-faced Honeyeater on the reproductive success of the Grey-crowned Babbler
Kazuhiro Eguchi A F , Noriyuki Yamaguchi B D , Keisuke Ueda B and Richard A. Noske C EA Department of Biology, Faculty of Sciences, Kyushu University, Fukuoka 812-8581, Japan.
B Laboratory of Animal Ecology, Faculty of Science, Rikkyo University, Tokyo 171-8501, Japan.
C Research Institute for the Environment and Livelihoods, Charles Darwin University, Darwin, NT 0909, Australia.
D Present address: Graduate School of Fisheries and Environmental Studies, Nagasaki University, 1-14 Bunkyo-machi, Nagasaki 852-8521, Japan.
E Present address: Environmental Futures School, Griffith University, Nathan, Qld 4111, Australia.
F Corresponding author. Email: kegucscb@kyushu-u.org
Emu 113(1) 77-83 https://doi.org/10.1071/MU12044
Submitted: 25 October 2011 Accepted: 26 November 2012 Published: 22 February 2013
Abstract
Nest-building is a costly activity and natural selection may sometimes favour usurpation of existing nests. Few quantitative studies have investigated the effect of usurpation of nests on the reproductive success of the usurped species. Here we studied 27 instances of usurpation of Grey-crowned Babbler (Pomatostomus temporalis) nests (n = 310 nests) by Blue-faced Honeyeaters (Entomyzon cyanotis) in the monsoon tropics of Australia between 2003 and 2008. When usurpation occurred during laying or incubation the Babbler eggs disappeared. The frequency of nest usurpation by Blue-faced Honeyeaters varied between Babbler territories, from no usurpation to almost every year during the study period. Based on video-recording at Babblers’ nests over 854 days, we observed 75 interference events on 39 days at 29 nests. Interference occurred most frequently during nest-building and incubation and much less frequently in the nestling stage. Modelling suggested interference by Honeyeaters can have severe effects on breeding of Grey-crowned Babblers, with success of individual nests reduced by 52.5% during the nest-building stage, 25.9% during incubation, and 1.2% during the nestling stage. Babbler group size did not affect the occurrence of interference. The southern subspecies of Grey-crowned Babbler is declining and it is conceivable that populations could be adversely affected by interference from Blue-faced Honeyeaters in areas where the two species co-occur.
Additional keywords: Entomyzon cyanotis, interspecific competition, monsoon tropics, nest-building, Pomatostomus temporalis.
References
Blackmore, C. J., and Heinsohn, R. (2007). Reproductive success and helper effects in the cooperatively breeding Grey-crowned Babbler. Journal of Zoology 273, 326–332.| Reproductive success and helper effects in the cooperatively breeding Grey-crowned Babbler.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Brown, J. L., Dow, D. D., Brown, E. R., and Brown, S. D. (1978). Effects of helpers on feeding of nestlings in the Grey-crowned Babbler (Pomatostomus temporalis). Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 4, 43–59.
| Effects of helpers on feeding of nestlings in the Grey-crowned Babbler (Pomatostomus temporalis).Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Campbell, A. J. (1901). ‘Nests and Eggs of Australian Birds.’ (Pawson and Brailsford: Sheffield, UK.)
Carlin, B. P., Clark, J. S., and Gelfand, A. E. (2006). Elements of hierarchical Bayesian inference. In ‘Hierarchical Modelling for the Environmental Sciences: Statistical Methods and Applications’. (Eds J. S. Clark and A. E. Gelfand.) pp. 3–24. (Oxford University Press: Oxford, UK.)
Doherty, P. F., and Grubb, T. C. (2002). Nest usurpation is an ‘edge effect’ for Carolina Chikadees Poecile carolinensis. Journal of Avian Biology 33, 77–82.
| Nest usurpation is an ‘edge effect’ for Carolina Chikadees Poecile carolinensis.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Dow, D. D., and King, B. R. (1984). Communal building of brood and roost nests by the Grey- crowned Babbler Pomatostomus temporalis. Emu 84, 193–199.
| Communal building of brood and roost nests by the Grey- crowned Babbler Pomatostomus temporalis.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Eguchi, K., Yamaguchi, N., Ueda, K., Nagata, H., Takagi, M., and Noske, R. (2007). Social structure and helping behaviour of the Grey-crowned Babbler Pomatostomus temporalis. Journal of Ornithology 148, 203–210.
| Social structure and helping behaviour of the Grey-crowned Babbler Pomatostomus temporalis.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Favaloro, N. (1941). The usurpation of nests, nesting sites and materials. Emu 41, 268–276.
| The usurpation of nests, nesting sites and materials.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Gelman, A., Cartin, J. B., Stern, H. S., and Rubin, D. B. (2004). ‘Bayesian Data Analysis’, 2nd edn. (Chapman and Hall/CRC: London.)
Heinsohn, R., Murphy, S., and Legge, S. (2003). Overlap and competition for nest holes among Eclectus Parrots, Palm Cockatoos and Sulphur-crested Cockatoos. Australian Journal of Zoology 51, 81–94.
| Overlap and competition for nest holes among Eclectus Parrots, Palm Cockatoos and Sulphur-crested Cockatoos.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Higgins, P. J., and Peter, J. M. (Eds) (2002). ‘Handbook of Australian, New Zealand and Antarctic Birds. Vol. 6: Pardalotes to Shrike-thrushes.’ (Oxford University Press: Melbourne.)
Higgins, P. J., Peter, J. M., and Steele, W. K. (Eds) (2001). ‘Handbook of Australian, New Zealand and Antarctic Birds. Vol. 5: Tyrant-flycatchers to Chats.’ (Oxford University Press: Melbourne.)
Ingold, D. J. (1989). Nesting phenology and competition for nest sites among Red-headed and Red-bellied Woodpeckers and European Starlings. Auk 106, 209–217.
Ingold, D. J. (1994). Influence of nest-site competition between European Starlings and woodpeckers. Wilson Bulletin 106, 227–241.
Ingold, D. J. (1998). The influence of Starlings on flicker reproduction when both naturally excavated cavities and artificial nest boxes are available. Wilson Bulletin 110, 218–225.
Kerpez, T. A., and Smith, N. S. (1990). Competition between European Starlings and native woodpeckers for nest cavities in saguaros. Auk 107, 367–375.
| Competition between European Starlings and native woodpeckers for nest cavities in saguaros.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
King, B. R. (1980). Social organization and behavior of the Grey-crowned Babbler Pomatostomus temporalis. Emu 80, 59–76.
| Social organization and behavior of the Grey-crowned Babbler Pomatostomus temporalis.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Koenig, W. D. (2003). European Starlings and their effect on native cavity-nesting birds. Conservation Biology 17, 1134–1140.
| European Starlings and their effect on native cavity-nesting birds.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Kronland, W. J. (2007). Nest usurpation by Red-headed Woodpeckers in southeastern Montana. Wilson Journal of Ornithology 119, 486–489.
| Nest usurpation by Red-headed Woodpeckers in southeastern Montana.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Lindell, L. (1996). Patterns of nest usurpation: when should species converge on nest niches? Condor 98, 464–473.
| Patterns of nest usurpation: when should species converge on nest niches?Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Lord, E. A. R. (1950). Notes on the Blue-faced Honeyeater. Emu 50, 100–101.
| Notes on the Blue-faced Honeyeater.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Lunn, D. J., Thomas, A., Best, N., and Spiegelhalter, D. (2000). WinBUGS – a Bayesian modelling framework: concepts, structure, and extensibility. Statistics and Computing 10, 325–337.
| WinBUGS – a Bayesian modelling framework: concepts, structure, and extensibility.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Matthew, J. S. (2007). Family Pomatostomidae (Australasian babblers). In ‘Handbook of the Birds of the World. Vol. 12: Picathartes to Tits and Chickadees’. (Eds J. Del Hoyo, A. Elliott and D. Christie.) pp. 322–336. (Lynx Edicions: Barcelona.)
Nielsen, L. (1961). Nesting of the Blue-faced Honeyeater. Emu 61, 198–200.
| Nesting of the Blue-faced Honeyeater.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
North, A. J. (1907). ‘Nests and Eggs of Birds Found Breeding in Australia and Tasmania.’ (Australian Museum: Sydney.)
Pribil, S., and Picman, J. (1991). Why House Wrens destroy clutches of other birds: a support for the nest site competition hypothesis. The Condor 93, 184–185.
Prokop, P. (2004). The effect of nest usurpation on breeding success of the Black-billed Magpie Pica pica. Biologia 59, 213–217.
R Development Core Team (2010). ‘R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing.’ (R Foundation for Statistical Computing: Vienna, Austria.) Available at http://www.R-project.org [Verified 9 January 2013].
Roberts, N. L. (1955a). A survey of the habit of nest-appropriation. Part 1. Emu 55, 110–126.
| A survey of the habit of nest-appropriation. Part 1.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Roberts, N. L. (1955b). A survey of the habit of nest-appropriation. Part 2. Emu 55, 173–184.
| A survey of the habit of nest-appropriation. Part 2.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |