Register      Login
Emu Emu Society
Journal of BirdLife Australia
REVIEW

Quantitative genetics research in Zebra Finches: where we are and where to go

Barbara Tschirren A and Erik Postma B C
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations

A Department of Animal Ecology, Sölvegatan 37, Lund University, S-223-62 Lund, Sweden.

B Institute of Evolutionary Biology and Environmental Studies, University of Zürich, Winterthurerstrasse 190, CH-8057 Zürich, Switzerland.

C Corresponding author. Email: erik.postma@ieu.uzh.ch

Emu 110(3) 268-278 https://doi.org/10.1071/MU09092
Submitted: 16 September 2009  Accepted: 12 January 2010   Published: 18 August 2010

Abstract

The ease with which Zebra Finches can be kept and bred in captivity makes them a suitable model for avian quantitative genetic studies. After a brief introduction to some quantitative genetic concepts, we here provide an up-to-date overview of quantitative genetic studies in Zebra Finches. We discuss what these studies can teach us about the evolutionary and behavioural ecology of Zebra Finches and song birds in general, and make suggestions for future research. Throughout this article we plead for a greater appreciation of the advantages offered by working on captive birds, but also discuss their limitations. Although quantitative genetic analyses in natural populations are becoming increasingly powerful, these studies lack the control possible in captivity. However, obtaining meaningful estimates of the type and strength of selection acting on phenotypic variation is more difficult in captivity. Hence, quantitative genetic studies in the wild and captivity each have their strengths and weaknesses and should be considered complementary rather than opposing. However, whereas quantitative genetic studies in the wild have boomed, the unique advantages offered by captive Zebra Finches have remained underexploited. Here we make a first attempt at changing this by highlighting what we believe may be fruitful lines for future research.


Acknowledgements

We thank the editors, as well as Wolfgang Forstmeier and an anonymous reviewer for comments on this manuscript. The Swiss National Science Foundation (SNF) financially supported B. Tschirren (Fellowship no. PA00A3–121466) and E. Postma (grant 31003A-116794) during the writing of this review.


References

Airey, D. C. , and DeVoogd, T. J. (2000). Greater song complexity is associated with augmented song system anatomy in zebra finches. Neuroreport 11, 2339–2344.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | PubMed | Falconer D. S. , and Mackay T. F. C. (1996). ‘Introduction to Quantitative Genetics.’ (Longman: New York.)

Festing, M. F. W. (1999). Warning: the use of heterogeneous mice may seriously damage your research. Neurobiology of Aging 20, 237–244.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | PubMed | Gil D. (2008). Hormones in avian eggs: physiology, ecology and behavior. In ‘Advances in the Study of Behavior’. (Eds H. J. Brockmann, T. J. Roper, M. Naguib, K. E. Wynne-Edwards, C. Barnard and J. Mitani.) pp. 337–398. (Elsevier: San Diego, CA.)

Gil, D. , Graves, J. , Hazon, N. , and Wells, A. (1999). Male attractiveness and differential testosterone investment in zebra finch eggs. Science 286, 126–128.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | PubMed | Lynch M. , and Walsh B. (1998). ‘Genetics and Analysis of Quantitative Traits.’ (Sinauer Associates, Inc.: Sunderland, MA.)

Merilä J. , and Sheldon B. C. (2001). Avian quantitative genetics. In ‘Current Ornithology’. (Eds V. J. Nolan and C. F. Thompson.) pp. 179–225. (Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers: New York.)

Mousseau T. A. , and Fox C. W. (1998). ‘Maternal Effects as Adaptations.’ (Oxford University Press: New York.)

Munsell, A. H. (1912). A pigment color system and notation. The American Journal of Psychology 23, 236–244.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | Powell J. R. (1997). ‘Progress and Prospects in Evolutionary Biology: The Drosophila Model.’ (Oxford University Press: New York.)

Price, D. K. (1996). Sexual selection, selection load and quantitative genetics of zebra finch bill colour. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B. Biological Sciences 263, 217–221.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | Riebel K. (2009). Song and female mate choice in zebra finches: a review. In ‘Advances in the Study of Behavior’. (Eds M. Naguib, K. Zuberbuhler, N. S. Clayton and V. M. Janik.) pp. 197–238. (Elsevier: San Diego, CA.)

Rønning, B. , Moe, B. , and Bech, C. (2005). Long-term repeatability makes basal metabolic rate a likely heritable trait in the zebra finch Taeniopygia guttata. Journal of Experimental Biology 208, 4663–4669.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | PubMed | Searcy W. A. , and Yasukawa K. (1996). Song and female choice. In ‘Ecology and Evolution of Acoustic Communication in Birds’. (Eds D. E. Kroodsma and E. H. Miller.) pp. 454–473. (Comstock Publishing Associates: Ithaca, NY.)

Silverin, B. (1998). Stress responses in birds. Poultry and Avian Biology Reviews 9, 153–168.
Zann R. (1996). ‘The Zebra Finch: A Synthesis of Field and Laboratory Studies.’ (Oxford University Press: New York.)