Register      Login
Emu Emu Society
Journal of BirdLife Australia
Shopping Cart: ( empty )
You are here: Home > Journals > MU > MU09045
RESEARCH ARTICLE
Contents Vol 110(2)

Nest-site utilisation and niche overlap in two sympatric, cavity-nesting finches

James Brazill-Boast A B , Sarah R. Pryke A and Simon C. Griffith A
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations

A Department of Brain, Behaviour and Evolution, Macquarie University, Sydney, NSW 2109, Australia.

B Corresponding author. Email: james.brazill-boast@mq.edu.au

Emu 110(2) 170-177 https://doi.org/10.1071/MU09045
Submitted: 25 May 2009  Accepted: 22 March 2010   Published: 26 May 2010

Abstract

Determining the relative access of a species to critical limiting resources requires knowledge of the spectrum of their resource utilisation (niche space) and that of potential competitors, and the frequency distribution of resources in the environment. We used this theoretical framework to assess the relative access to nesting sites and the potential for interspecific competition between two sympatric cavity-nesting finches. Gouldian (Erythrura gouldiae) and Long-tailed (Poephila acuticauda) Finches are both estrildid finches with similar ecological requirements, gross morphology and geographical ranges. By measuring the characteristics of all tree-cavities in an area of breeding habitat, and identifying those used by each of the two species, we were able to quantify the relationship between total available variation and variation in use by Gouldian and Long-tailed Finches. Using a likelihood-based method, we found that Long-tailed Finches exhibited a broader niche than Gouldian Finches with respect to available variation, and that these niches overlapped. Using these data we estimated that the effective availability of suitable nesting sites for Long-tailed Finches was 38% greater than for Gouldian Finches. Their relatively specialised niche and overlap with a more generalist competitor has the potential to constrain reproduction for Gouldian Finches, and will have implications for the conservation of remaining populations of this endangered species.


Acknowledgements

We thank Liam Brunner, Josephine Dessmann, Christophe Dufresnes and Nina Svedin for all their help with data collection in the field; Save the Gouldian Fund (Cooranbong, NSW) for providing valuable equipment to the project; and the Shire and residents of Wyndham for their help and hospitality. Funding was provided by the Australian Research Council Discovery (S. R. Pryke) and Linkage Grants (S. R. Pryke and S. C. Griffith), and a Macquarie University Research Excellence Scholarship (J. Brazill-Boast).


References

Ackermann, M. , and Doebeli, M. (2004). Evolution of niche width and adaptive diversification. Evolution 58, 2599–2612.
| PubMed | Cody M. (1974). ‘Competition and the Structure of Bird Communities.’ (Princeton University Press: Princeton, NJ.)

Colwell, R. K. , and Futuyma, D. J. (1971). On the measurement of niche breadth and overlap. Ecology 52(4), 567–576.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | Garnett S. T. , and Crowley G. M. (2000). ‘The Action Plan for Australian Birds 2000.’ (Environment Australia: Canberra.) Available at http://www.environment.gov.au/biodiversity/threatened/publications/action/birds2000/index.html [Verified 5 May 2010].

Gibbons P. , and Lindenmayer D. (2002). ‘Tree Hollows and Wildlife Conservation in Australia.’ (CSIRO Publishing: Melbourne.)

Goldingay, R. L. (2009). Characteristics of tree hollows used by Australian birds and bats. Wildlife Research 36, 394–409.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | Higgins P. , Peter J. , and Cowling S. (Eds) (2006). ‘Handbook of Australian, New Zealand and Antarctic Birds. Vol. 7: Boatbills to Starlings.’ (Oxford University Press: Melbourne.)

Hutchinson, G. E. (1959). Homage to Santa Rosalina or Why are there so many kinds of animals? American Naturalist 93, 145–159.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | May R. M. , Crawley M. J. , and Sugihara G. (2007). Communities: patterns. In ‘Theoretical Ecology: Principles and Applications’. 3rd edn. (Eds R. M. May and A. R. McLean.) pp. 111–131. (Oxford University Press: Oxford, UK.)

Miller, R. S. (1967). Patterns and processes in competition. Advances in Ecological Research 4, 1–74.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | Newton I. (1998). ‘Population Limitation in Birds.’ (Academic Press: San Diego, CA.)

Nilsson, S. G. (1984). The evolution of nest-site selection among hole-nesting birds: the importance of nest predation and competition. Ornis Scandinavica 15, 167–175.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | Tidemann S. C. (1990). The relationship between finches and pastoral practices in northern Australia. In ‘Granivorous Birds and Agriculture’. (Eds J. Pinowski and J. D. Summers-Smith.) pp. 305–315. (PWN Polish Scientific Publishers: Warsaw.)

Tidemann, S. C. (1996). Causes of decline of the Gouldian Finch Erythrura gouldiae. Bird Conservation International 6, 49–61.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | Tilman D. (1982). ‘Resource Competition and Community Structure.’ (Princeton University Press: Princeton, NJ.)

Tilman D. (2007). Interspecific competition and multispecies coexistence. In ‘Theoretical Ecology: Principles and Applications’. (Eds. R. M. May and A. R. McLean.) pp. 84–97. (Oxford University Press: Oxford, UK.)

von Haartman, L. (1957). Adaptation in hole-nesting birds. Evolution 11, 339–347.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | Williams R. J. , Muller W. J. , Wahren C. J. , Setterfield S. A. , and Cusack J. (2003). Chapter 6: Vegetation. In ‘Fire in Tropical Savannas: The Kapalga Experiment’. (Eds. A. N. Andersen, G. D. Cook and R. J. Williams.) pp. 79–106. (Springer-Verlag: New York.)

Wilson, D. S. , and Yoshimura, J. (1994). On the coexistence of specialists and generalists. American Naturalist 144, 692–707.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Woinarski, J. C. Z. , and Tidemann, S. C. (1992). Survivorship and some population parameters for the endangered Gouldian Finch Erythrura gouldiae and two other finch species at two sites in tropical northern Australia. Emu 92, 33–38.