Free Standard AU & NZ Shipping For All Book Orders Over $80!
Register      Login
Emu Emu Society
Journal of BirdLife Australia
Shopping Cart: ( empty )
You are here: Home > Journals > MU > MU09024
RESEARCH ARTICLE
Contents Vol 109(3)

Red-backed Hawks supply food to scavenging Chimango Caracaras

Alejandro V. Baladrón A B D , Laura M. Biondi A B , María S. Bó A , Ana I. Malizia A and Marc J. Bechard C
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations

A Laboratorio de Vertebrados, Departamento de Biología, Universidad Nacional de Mar del Plata, Funes 3250, Mar del Plata, B7602AYJ, Argentina.

B Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas – CONICET, Rivadavia 1917, Buenos Aires, C1033AAJ, Argentina.

C Raptor Research Center, Department of Biology, Boise State University, 1910 University Drive, Boise, ID 83725-1515, USA.

D Corresponding author. Email: abaladro@mdp.edu.ar

Emu 109(3) 260-264 https://doi.org/10.1071/MU09024
Submitted: 21 March 2009  Accepted: 3 July 2009   Published: 8 September 2009

Abstract

Positive interactions between species of terrestrial vertebrates occur frequently and it is common among birds. However, such interactions have generally been overlooked in raptor field studies. We analysed interactions between Red-backed Hawks (Buteo polyosoma) and Chimango Caracaras (Milvago chimango) in order to determine the characteristics of the association between these two South American raptors. We observed 171 bouts of activity, 40 when Red-backed Hawks were feeding and 131 when the Hawks were undertaking other activities. Chimango Caracaras were more often present when Red-backed Hawks were feeding (81%) than during other activities of Red-backed Hawks (69%), but they attacked Red-backed Hawks more frequently during other activities of the Hawks (66%) than when the Hawks were feeding (43%). In addition, the rate of attacks by Chimango Caracaras was higher during other activities of the Hawks (mean = 2.21 attacks per Caracara) than when the Hawks were feeding (mean = 0.68 attacks per Caracara). Duration of feeding activities was not affected significantly by the presence of Chimango Caracaras or by attacks by the Caracaras. During 16 of 40 feeding bouts of Hawks, an average of 1.81 ± 0.23 (s.e.) Caracaras fed on prey discarded by the Hawks. Thus, Red-backed Hawks indirectly supplied food to Chimango Caracaras, which, in turn, reduced their agonistic behaviour towards Hawks. Our findings represent one of few cases reported about facilitative associations among raptors, but it seems likely that it represents a common strategy among these birds.


Acknowledgements

We thank C. Godoy and L. Scenna for field assistance. J. P. Isacch, A. Vassallo and three anonymous referees provided helpful and constructive comments on an earlier version of the manuscript. Funding for this study was provided through a grant from the Universidad Nacional de Mar del Plata (15-E238) and CONICET fellowships to A. Baladrón and L. Biondi.


References

Aprile G. , and Bertonatti C. (1996). ‘Manual Sobre Rehabilitación de Fauna.’ (Fundación Vida Silvestre Argentina: Buenos Aires, Argentina.)

Baladrón, A. V. , Bó, M. S. , and Malizia, A. I. (2006). Winter diet and time-activity budgets of Red-backed Hawk (Buteo polyosoma) in the coastal grasslands of Buenos Aires Province, Argentina. Journal of Raptor Research 40, 65–70.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | Bilenca D. , and Miñarro F. (2004). ‘Identificación de áreas valiosas de pastizal en las pampas y campos de Argentina, Uruguay y Sur de Brasil.’ (Fundación Vida Silvestre Argentina: Buenos Aires, Argentina.)

Biondi, L. M. , Bó, M. S. , and Favero, M. (2005). Dieta del Chimango (Milvago chimango) durante el periodo reproductivo en el sudeste de la provincia de Buenos Aires, Argentina. Ornitologia Neotropical 16, 31–42.
Burger J. (1988). ‘Seabirds and Other Marine Vertebrates: Competition Predation and Other Interactions.’ (Columbia University Press: New York.)

Cabezas, V. M. , and Schlatter, R. P. (1987). Hábitos y comportamiento alimentario de Milvago chimango Vieillot, 1816 (Aves, Falconidae). Anales del Museo de Historia Natural de Valparaiso 18, 131–141.
Canevari M. , Canevari P. , Carrizo R. , Harris G. , Rodríguez Mata J. , and Straneck R. J. (1991). ‘Nueva Guía de las Aves Argentinas.’ (Fundación Acindar: Buenos Aires, Argentina.)

Connor, R. C. (1996). Partner preferences in by-product mutualisms and the case of predator inspection in fish. Animal Behaviour 51, 451–454.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | Crawley M. J. (2007). ‘The R Book.’ (Wiley: Chichester, UK.)

Daleo, P. , Escapa, M. , Isacch, J. P. , Iribarne, O. , and Ribeiro, P. (2005). Trophic facilitation by the oystercatcher Haematopus palliatus Temminick on the scavenger snail Buccinanops globulosum Kiener in a Patagonian bay. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology 325, 27–34.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | Ferguson-Lees J. , and Christie D. A. (2001). ‘Raptors of the World.’ (Houghton Mifflin Company: Boston, MA.)

Fraga, R. M. , and Salvador, S. A. (1986). Biología reproductiva del chimango (Polyborus chimango). Hornero 12, 223–229.
Gaibani G. , and Csermely D. (2007). Behavioral studies. In ‘Raptor Research and Management Techniques’. (Eds D. M. Bird and K. L. Bildstein.) pp. 129–151. (Hancock House: Blaine, WA, USA.)

Isacch J. P. , Bó M. S. , Comparatore V. , Herrera L. , Vargas R. , and Martínez M. M. (2001). Las aves de los pastizales costeros del Sudeste de la Provincia de Buenos Aires. In ‘Reserva de Biosfera Mar Chiquita: Características Físicas, Biológicas y Ecológicas’. (Ed. O. Iribarne.) pp. 269–285. (Editorial Martin: Mar del Plata, Argentina.)

Malizia A. I. , Antinuchi D. , and Vassallo A. I. (2001). Aspectos ecológicos de la comunidad de roedores de la reserva de Mar Chiquita con énfasis en el roedor subterráneo Ctenomys talarum. In ‘Reserva de Biosfera Mar Chiquita: Características Físicas, Biológicas y Ecológicas’. (Ed. O. Iribarne.) pp. 287–302. (Editorial Martin: Mar del Plata, Argentina.)

Martin P. , and Bateson P. (1993). ‘Measuring Behaviour: An Introductory Guide.’ (Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK.)

Narosky T. , and Di Giácomo A. (1993). ‘Las Aves de la Provincia de Buenos Aires: Distribución y Estatus.’ (Asociación Ornitológica del Plata, Vázquez Massini and L.O.L.A.: Buenos Aires, Argentina.)

Newton I. (1979). ‘Population Ecology of Raptors.’ (T. and A. D. Poyser: Berkhamsted, UK.)

Oliver, T. H. , Leather, S. R. , and Cook, J. M. (2009). Tolerance traits and the stability of mutualism. Oikos 118, 346–352.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | R Development Core Team (2008). ‘R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing.’ (R Foundation for Statistical Computing: Vienna, Austria.) Available at http://www.r-project.org/ [Verified February 2009].

Rand, A. L. (1954). Social feeding behaviour in birds. Fieldiana Zoology 36, 1–71.
Stutz S. (2001). Vegetación del área de la Laguna Mar Chiquita. In ‘Reserva de Biosfera Mar Chiquita: Características Físicas, Biológicas y Ecológicas’. (Ed. O. Iribarne.) pp. 287–302. (Editorial Martin: Mar del Plata, Argentina.)

Thiollay J. M. (1994). Family Accipitridae (Hawks and Eagles). In ‘Handbook of the Birds of the World. Vol. 2: New World Vultures to Guineafowl’. (Eds J. del Hoyo, A. Elliot and J. Sargatal.) pp. 52–205. (Lynx Edicions: Barcelona.)

Travaini, A. , Donázar, J. A. , Rodríguez, A. , Ceballos, O. , Funes, M. , Delibes, M. , and Hiraldo, F. (1998). Use of European hare (Lepus europaeus) carcasses by an avian scavenging assemblage in Patagonia. Journal of Zoology 246, 175–181.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | White C. M. , Olsen P. D. , and Cliff L. F. (1994). Family Falconidae (Falcons and Caracaras). ‘Handbook of the birds of the world. Vol. 2: New World Vultures to Guineafowl’. (Eds J. del Hoyo, A. Elliot and J. Sargatal.) pp. 216–275. (Lynx Editions: Barcelona.)

Wilmers, C. C. , Crabtree, R. L. , Smith, D. W. , Murphy, K. M. , and Getz, W. M. (2003). Trophic facilitation by introduced top predators: grey wolf subsidies to scavengers in Yellowstone National Park. Journal of Animal Ecology 72, 909–916.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |