Stocktake Sale on now: wide range of books at up to 70% off!
Register      Login
Emu Emu Society
Journal of BirdLife Australia
Shopping Cart: ( empty )
You are here: Home > Journals > MU > MU07052
RESEARCH ARTICLE
Contents Vol 108(2)

Seasonal variation in social organisation and diurnal activity budget of the Greater Rhea (Rhea americana) in the Argentinean pampas

Mariana E. Carro A B and Gustavo J. Fernández A
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations

A Laboratorio de Ecología y Comportamiento Animal, Departamento de Ecología, Genética y Evolución, Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales, Universidad de Buenos Aires; Pabellón II, Ciudad Universitaria, C1428EHA, Buenos Aires, Argentina.

B Corresponding author. Email: camariana@gmail.com

Emu 108(2) 167-173 https://doi.org/10.1071/MU07052
Submitted: 6 September 2007  Accepted: 8 May 2008   Published: 20 June 2008

Abstract

We analysed seasonal variation in the size and composition of groups, and individual behaviour, of a wild population of Greater Rheas (Rhea americana) in the Argentinean pampas. We performed seasonal censuses over 8 years, and made focal observations on 59 individuals from different groups to assess the proportion of time spent in vigilance, feeding, walking, preening or resting, and noted the number of courtship displays, copulations and aggressive interactions. Rheas were solitary or formed groups of 2–20 individuals. Mean typical group-size (TGS) over the year was 7.61 birds but varied significantly with season, TGS decreasing during the breeding season (spring), possibly owing to formation of harems. TGS of males decreased in spring whereas TGS of females did not vary seasonally. During spring, individuals spent more time vigilant and less time feeding, and were involved in many courtship interactions. Most aggression (72%) was between males and mainly occurred during winter and spring, suggesting strong intrasexual competition. Social organisation and group dynamics appear to be profoundly affected by the mating system of the Greater Rhea.


Acknowledgements

We thank M. Mermoz for helpful comments on a previous version of this manuscript. We also thank J. Boote and H. Martinez Guerrero for allowing us to conduct this study at Estancias Los Yngleses and La Clementina, and R. Paso, J. Flores, and A. Guzmán for their collaboration. M. Beade, M. Mermoz, F. Lorenzini and S. Rossi helped us at various stages of the field work. M. Beade from the Fundación Vida Silvestre Argentina provided logistical support during the field work. We are very grateful to J. Cajal for lending us his car during the 1994 and 1995 breeding seasons. We thank two anonymous reviewers for comments on an earlier version of this manuscript, and C. Battagliese and G. Collins for checking the English grammar. This study was supported by a grant from the Fundación para la Conservación de las Especies y el Medio Ambiente (FUCEMA) and from the University of Buenos Aires. All methods used in the present study meet the ethical requirements for scientific research of the University of Buenos Aires and comply with the current laws of Argentina.


References

Alexander, R. (1974). The evolution of social behaviour. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 5, 325–383.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | Bertram B. C. R. (1978). Living in groups: predators and prey. In ‘Behavioural Ecology: An Evolutionary Approach’. 1st edn. (Eds J. R. Krebs and N. B. Davies.) pp. 64–96. (Blackwell Scientific Publications: Oxford, UK.)

Bertram, B. C. R. (1980). Vigilance and group size in ostriches. Animal Behaviour 28, 278–286.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | Caro T. (2005). ‘Antipredator Defences in Birds and Mammals.’ (Chicago University Press: Chicago, IL.)

Carro M. E. (2006). Comportamiento de vigilancia del Ñandú Común, Rhea americana: ventajas de la vida en grupo. B.Sc. Thesis, Universidad de Buenos Aires, Argentina.

Chapman, C. A. , Wrangham, R. W. , and Chapman, L. J. (1995). Ecological constraints on group size: an analysis of spider monkey and chimpanzee subgroups. Behavioural Ecology and Sociobiology 36, 59–70.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | Clutton-Brock T. H., Guinness F. E., and Albon S. D. (1982). ‘Red Deer: Behaviour and Ecology of Two Sexes.’ (Edinburgh University Press: Edinburgh.)

Clutton-Brock, T. H. , Iason, G. R. , and Guinness, F. E. (1987). Sexual segregation and density-related changes in habitat use in male and female red deer (Cervus elaphus). Journal of Zoology 211, 275–289.
Crawley M. (1993). ‘Glim for Ecologists.’ (Blackwell Scientific Publications: Oxford, UK.)

Davis S. J. J. F. (2002). ‘Ratites and Tinamous.’ (Oxford University Press: Oxford, UK.)

Emlen, S. T. , and Oring, L. W. (1977). Ecology, sexual selection and the evolution of mating systems. Science 197, 215–223.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | PubMed | Hammer W. M., and Parrish J. K. (1997). Is the sum of the parts equal to the whole? The conflict between individuality and group membership. In ‘Animal Groups in Three Dimensions’. (Eds W. M. Hammer and J. K. Parrish.) pp. 165–173. (Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK.)

Handford, P. , and Mares, M. A. (1985). The mating systems of ratites and tinamous: an evolutionary perspective. Biological Journal of the Linnaean Society 25, 77–104.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | Hudson W. H. (1920). ‘Birds of La Plata.’ (J. M. Dent & Sons: London.)

Jarman, P. J. (1974). The social organization of antelope in relation to their ecology. Behaviour 48, 215–267.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | Pulliam H. R., and Caraco T. (1984). Living in groups: is there and optimal group size? In ‘Behavioural Ecology: An Evolutionary Approach’. 2nd edn. (Eds J. R. Krebs and N. D. Davies.) pp. 122–147. (Blackwell Science: Oxford, UK.)

Raikow, R. J. (1968). Maintenance behavior of the Common Rhea. Wilson Bulletin 80, 312–319.
Ritz D. A. (1997). Costs and benefits as a function of group size: experiments on a swarming mysid Paramesopodopsis rufa Fenton. In ‘Animal Groups in Three Dimensions’. (Eds W. M. Hammer and J. K. Parrish.) pp. 194–206. (Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK.)

Ruckstuhl, K. E. , and Neuhaus, P. (2000). Sexual segregation in ungulates: a new approach. Behaviour 137, 361–377.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | Soriano A., León R. J. C., Sala O. E., Lavado R. S., Deregibus V. A., Cauhepe M. A., Scaglia O. A., Velásquez C. A., and Lemcoff J. H. (1991). Rio de la Plata Grasslands. In ‘Ecosystems of the World 8A. Natural Grasslands’. (Ed. R. T. Coupland.) pp. 367–407. (Elsevier: London.)

Wilson K., and Hardy I. C. W. (2002). Statistical analysis of sex ratios: an introduction. In ‘Sex Ratios: Concepts and Research Methods’. (Ed. I. C. W. Hardy.) pp. 48–92. (Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK.)