Register      Login
Emu Emu Society
Journal of BirdLife Australia
RESEARCH ARTICLE

Seasonal and habitat-related changes in population density of North Island Saddlebacks (Philesturnus rufusater) on a small island: using distance sampling to determine variation

Dianne H. Brunton A C and Rosalie Stamp B
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations

A Ecology and Conservation Group, Institute of Natural Resources, Massey University, Albany Campus, Auckland, New Zealand.

B Department of Conservation, Auckland Conservancy, Auckland, New Zealand.

C Corresponding author. Email: d.h.brunton@massey.ac.nz

Emu 107(3) 196-202 https://doi.org/10.1071/MU06051
Submitted: 20 October 2006  Accepted: 18 June 2007   Published: 3 September 2007

Abstract

We applied line-transect distance sampling to look at small-scale seasonal and habitat-related changes in abundance of North Island Saddlebacks (Philesturnus rufusater) on a small protected offshore island. We also assessed the recovery of Saddleback density in a mature forest patch on the island after removal of a small number of Saddlebacks for translocation (harvesting). From June 2003 to June 2004, we conducted 34 km of line-transect surveys on 15 transects in five forest patches (two mature forest patches, two replanted forest patches and the harvested mature forest patch). Different seasonal trends were identified for the two habitat types. Densities varied in replanted forest from a low of 3.18 ± 2.9 ha–1 (95% confidence intervals (CI)) in December–January (austral summer) to a high of 18.9 ± 2.5 ha–1 (95% CI) in April–May (austral autumn). In remnant mature forests, density varied less and ranged from a low of 5.23 ± 3.74 ha–1 (95% CI) in June–July (austral winter) to a peak of 14.2 ± 2.55 ha–1 (95% CI) in April–May. Differences in the densities of Saddlebacks in harvested and mature forest patches did not vary significantly. Juvenile density was higher than adult density in replanted patches, and we suggest that the decline in density in spring was caused by juvenile mortality. Although obtaining such detailed density estimates required considerable effort (34 km), this study has provided a current estimate of North Island Saddleback numbers on Tiritiri Matangi Island and has monitored a translocation source population. Finally, this analysis has highlighted testable hypotheses regarding juvenile dispersal and mortality, and seasonal use of different habitat types.

Additional keywords: estimating abundance, habitat variation, line transect methods, New Zealand


Acknowledgements

We would like to thank the Department of Conservation and the Supporters of Tiritiri Matangi Island for allowing us to conduct our fieldwork on this special island. This research was conducted under Department of Conservation permit number AK-14938-FAU. Comments by Rosemary Barraclough, Kevin Parker, Phill Cassey and two anonymous referees improved the manuscript. University of Auckland and Massey University supported this research.


References

Anders, A. D. , Dearborn, D. C. , Faaborg, J. , and Thompson, F. R. (1997). Juvenile survival in a population of neotropical migrant birds. Conservation Biology 11, 698–707.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | Barraclough R. K. (2000). Distance sampling: A discussion document produced for the Department of Conservation. New Zealand Department of Conservation, Wellington, Science and Research Internal Report No.175.

Beissinger S. R., and McCullough D. R. (2002). ‘Population Viability Analysis.’ (University of Chicago Press: Chicago, IL.)

Buckland S. T., Anderson D. R., Burnham K. P., Laake J. L., Borchers D. L., and Thomas L. (2001). ‘Introduction to Distance Sampling: Estimating Abundance of Biological Populations.’ (Oxford University Press: Oxford, UK.)

Buckland, S. T. , Burnham, K. P. , and Augustin, N. H. (1997). Model selection: an integral part of inference Biometrics 53, 603–618.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | Carlquist S. (1970). ‘Hawaii: A Natural History.’ (Natural History Press: Honolulu, HI.)

Casagrande, D. G. , and Beissinger, S. R. (1997). Evaluation of four methods for estimating Parrot population size Condor 99, 445–457.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | Heather B. D., and Robertson H. A. (1996). ‘The Field Guide to the Birds of New Zealand.’ (Viking Penguin: Auckland, NZ.)

Hooson, S. , and Jamieson, I. G. (2003). The distribution and current status of New Zealand Saddleback Philesturnus carunculatus Bird Conservation International 13, 79–95.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | Rimmer A. (2004). ‘Tiritiri Matangi: A Model of Conservation.’ (Tandem Press: Auckland.)

Serena M. (1995). ‘Reintroduction Biology of Australian and New Zealand Fauna.’ (Surrey Beatty: Sydney.)

Spurr, E. B. , and Anderson, S. H. (2004). Bird species diversity and abundance before and after eradication of possums and wallabies on Rangitoto Island, Hauraki Gulf, New Zealand New Zealand Journal of Ecology 28, 143–149.
Stamp R. K. (1999). Factors affecting reproductive success of the North Island Saddleback on Tirirtiri Matangi Island. M.Sc. Thesis, Unversity of Auckland, NZ.

Thomas L., Laake J. L., Derry J. F., Buckland S. T., Borchers D. L., Anderson D. R., Burnham K. P., Strindberg S., Hedley S. L., Burt M. L., Marques F. F. C., Pollard J. H., and Fewster R. M. (1998). ‘Distance 3.5.’ (Research Unit for Wildlife Population Assessment, University of St Andrews, Aberdeen, Scotland.)

Thomas L., Buckland S. T., Burnham K. P., Anderson D. R., Laake J. L., Borchers D. L., and Strindberg S. (2002). Distance sampling. In ‘Encylcopaedia of Environmetrics’. (Eds A. H. El-Shaarawi and W. W. Piegorsch.) pp. 544–552. (Wiley & Sons: Chichester, UK.)

Westbrooke, I. M. , Etheridge, N. D. , and Powlesland, R. G. (2003). Comparing methods for assessing mortality impacts of an aerial 1080 pest control operation on tomtits (Petroica macrocephala toitoi) in Tongariro New Zealand Journal of Ecology 27, 115–123.
Williams B. K., Nichols J. D., and Conroy M. J. (2002). Part III: Estimation Methods for Animal Populations. In ‘Analysis and Management of Animal Populations’. (Academic Press: London, UK.)