Diet of the Lesser Rhea (Pterocnemia pennata) and availability of food in the Andean Precordillera (Mendoza, Argentina)
Gilda Paoletti A and Silvia Puig A BA Unidad Ecología Animal, Instituto Argentino de Investigaciones de Zonas Aridas (IADIZA, CONICET), Casilla de Correo 507, Mendoza, Argentina.
B Corresponding author. Email: spuig@lab.cricyt.edu.ar
Emu 107(1) 52-58 https://doi.org/10.1071/MU05042
Submitted: 22 August 2005 Accepted: 14 August 2006 Published: 15 March 2007
Abstract
The food and foraging strategies of the Lesser Rhea (Pterocnemia pennata) were studied in the high arid pampas of the Andean Precordillera in Mendoza, Argentina. The Lesser Rhea is primarily herbivorous and the composition of, and seasonal changes in, the diet were analysed in relation to the availability of vegetation. The analysis of vegetation and sampling of faeces were carried out in spring, summer and autumn 2002–03. Grasses and shrubs dominated the vegetation of the study area, while forbs and cactus (Cactaceae) were present only in low proportions. The main dietary component was leaf matter (94.30%), with the rest seeds (5.66%) and a small proportion of insects (0.03%). Stones constituted 2.24% of the dry weight of faeces. The diet included 70% of the available plant species in the area. Rheas showed a preference for forbs and shrubs in relation to the availability of these plant-types and, while grasses were the dominant plant-type in the environment, they were not selected in relation to their availability; Rheas showed no preference for cactuses. Dietary diversity (Shannon–Wiener index of diversity of plant species in the diet = 0.77) exceeded environmental diversity (Shannon-Wiener index = 0.29). The diet of the Lesser Rhea in the Andean Precordillera of Mendoza was almost completely herbivorous and generalist, although selective for some plant species, features that would constitute an adaptation to survive in this clearly arid environment.
Acknowledgements
We acknowledge Professor Susana Monge for her invaluable help in the processing of leaf material and the loan of her microhistologic collection; to Dr Gustavo Flores for assistance with the identification of the arthropods; to Dr Daniel Sarasqueta and Ing. Silvia Cid for the generous contribution of bibliographic material and unpublished information; and to Professory Nelly Horak for her assistance in the English translation. Our thanks for inestimable logistic help to Juan Antunez, Rangers Celso Boccolini and Guillermo Ferraris, Dr Adriana Marvaldi, Professor María I. Rosi and Professor Fernando Videla. We thank the suggestions of the referees and the editors that enriched the paper.
Angel, C. R. (1996). A review of ratite nutrition. Animal Feeding Science and Technology 60, 241–246.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Bonferroni, C. E. (1936). Teoria statistica delle classi e calcolo delle probabilità. Pubblicazioni del Istituto Superiore di Scienze Economiche e Commerciali di Firenze 8, 3–62.
Canfield, R. (1941). Application of the line interception method in sampling range vegetation. Journal of Forestry 39, 388–394.
Milton, S. J. , Dean, J. , and Siegfrield, W. R. (1994). Food selection by ostrich in Southern Africa. Journal of Wildlife Management 58, 234–248.
Peña Neira, J. M. (1981). Métodos para determinar la composición botánica de la dieta de ganado doméstico y fauna silvestre. Técnica Pecuaria 40, 52–60.
Somlo, R. , Durañona, R. , and Ortiz, R. (1985). Valor nutritivo de especies forrajeras patagónicas. Revista Argentina de Producción Animal 5, 589–605.