Free Standard AU & NZ Shipping For All Book Orders Over $80!
Register      Login
Emu Emu Society
Journal of BirdLife Australia
RESEARCH ARTICLE

The effect of bill structure on seed selection and handling ability of five species of granivorous birds

Shernice Soobramoney A and Mike R. Perrin A B
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations

A School of Biological and Conservation Sciences, University of KwaZulu-Natal, Private Bag X01, Scottsville, Pietermaritzburg, 3209, South Africa.

B Corresponding author. Email: perrin@ukzn.ac.za

Emu 107(3) 169-176 https://doi.org/10.1071/MU05018
Submitted: 22 April 2005  Accepted: 18 May 2007   Published: 31 August 2007

Abstract

The relationships between bill morphology and seed characteristics (size and nutrients) with regard to feeding were investigated in five species of bird belonging to three families of granivorous passerines (Estrildidae, Ploceidae, Passeridae): Bronze Mannikin (Spermestes cucullatus), Cape Sparrow (Passer melanurus), Red Bishop (Euplectes orix) and Thick-billed Weaver (Amblyospiza albifrons) and the Bengalese Finch (Lonchura domestica). Birds husked all seeds (Japanese millet, white millet, red manna seed, canary seed, red sorghum and black niger) before ingestion. Monocotyledonous seeds were handled significantly faster than dicotyledenous seeds, and spherical seeds faster than elongate seeds. Handling time also increased with the size of seeds. Birds with medium-sized bills (Cape Sparrows) were most effective in husking most species of seeds. Birds with the smallest bills (Bronze Mannikin and Bengalese Finch) husked the smallest seeds fastest while birds with the largest bills (Thick-billed Weaver) husked the largest seeds fastest. Handling time was affected by size and shape of seeds and bill structure. However, handling time and nutritional intake rate did not determine seed selection. Japanese millet was the preferred seed type for all five bird species although it provided fewer calories per seed and less protein than other seeds. Results suggest that nutrition is less important than morphological traits of seeds: birds generally selected food items that were easiest to handle and could be processed faster, thereby gaining nutrients quickly.


Acknowledgements

The National Research Foundation provided funding (GUN 2054060) for the duration of the project. We thank Colleen Downs for initial comments on the project. We are grateful to Mark Brown for trapping birds and for all advice concerning different aspects of the project. The Department of Animal Science at the University of KwaZulu-Natal undertook analysis of nutritional content of the seeds.


References

Abbott, I. , Abbott, L. K. , and Grant, P. R. (1975). Seed selection and handling ability of four species of Darwin’s finches. Condor 77, 332–335.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | Grant P. R. (1986). ‘Ecology and Evolution of Darwin’s Finches.’ (Princeton University Press: Princeton, NJ.)

Helrich K. (1990). ‘Official Methods of Analysis.’ (Association of Analytical Chemists: Arlington, VA.)

Herrel, A. , Podos, J. , Huber, S. K. , and Hendry, A. P. (2005). Bite performance and morphology in a population of Darwin’s finches: implications for the evolution of beak shape. Functional Ecology 19, 43–48.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | Statsoft Inc. (1998). ‘Statistica for Windows.’ (Statsoft, Inc.: Tulsa, OK.)

Van der Meij, M. A. A. , and Bout, R. G. (2000). Seed selection in the Java sparrow (Padda oryzivora): preference and mechanical constraint. Canadian Journal of Zoology 78, 1668–1673.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | Welty J. C. (1975). ‘The Life of Birds.’ (W.B. Saunders: London.)

Weiner J. (1995). ‘The Beak of the Finch.’ (Vintage Press: London.)

Willson, M. F. (1971). Seed selection in some North American Finches. Condor 73, 415–429.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Willson, M. F. (1972). Seed size preference in finches. Wilson Bulletin 84, 449–455.


Willson, M. F. , and Harmeson, J. C. (1973). Seed preferences and digestive efficiency of cardinals and song sparrows. Condor 75, 225–234.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |