Free Standard AU & NZ Shipping For All Book Orders Over $80!
Register      Login
Marine and Freshwater Research Marine and Freshwater Research Society
Advances in the aquatic sciences
Shopping Cart: ( empty )
You are here: Home > Journals > MF > MF08019
RESEARCH ARTICLE
Contents Vol 60(7)

Biofilm structure and bed stability of five contrasting freshwater sediments

Ian G. Droppo
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations

Environment Canada, 867 Lakeshore Road, Burlington, ON L7R 4A6, Canada. Email: ian.droppo@ec.gc.ca

Marine and Freshwater Research 60(7) 690-699 https://doi.org/10.1071/MF08019
Submitted: 29 January 2008  Accepted: 10 February 2009   Published: 28 July 2009

Abstract

Using an annular flume, erosion characteristics of five diverse sediment types (stormwater pond, contaminated lacustrine, fluvial, aquaculture waste and industrial grade kaolin sediment), each with different physical and biological characteristics, were examined for relative erosion resistance and factors contributing to bed sediment stability. Suspended flocs represent primary building blocks of bed sediment with mass settling being independent of suspended solid concentration. Biofilm growth period, depositing floc structure and composition, nutrient supply and sediment properties all played a complex role in dictating the stability of the sediments. The river, lake and stormwater pond sediments were the most resistant to erosion relative to the high nutrient and organic content aquaculture sediment and kaolin. Biofilms developed to varying degrees on all sediments with the greatest growth occurring with the aquaculture sediment and the least with kaolin. While electrochemical properties will provide some attraction and stabilising forces, with no measurable consolidation evident for the examined sediments, it is suggested that active biofilm development was the dominant factor controlling bed stability and erosion potential. Differences in biological mediation of strength between sediments were partially attributed to the structural differences within the biofilms and integration of the extracellular polymeric fibril matrix within the sediment pores.

Additional keywords: bacteria, biostabilisation, EPS, erosion, floc, flocculation, shear.


Acknowledgements

The author would like to thank C. Jaskot and M. Reid for their assistance with image analysis, and B. Trapp, T. Nelson, S. Deignan, M. Marinas, C. Mitchell and L.-T. Pak for their help with field sampling and flume experiments. The Regional Municipality of Halton, ON, Canada provided in-kind and financial assistance with the stormwater pond work. In addition, the assistance provided by A. Mercer (Halton Region) was greatly appreciated. Funding for the South Nation River work was provided in part from the NAESI program. The review and critical comments of Prof. A. Boulton (MFR Editor), an anonymous Guest Editor, Dr. R. Wotton and one other anonymous reviewer were greatly appreciated.


References

Amos, C. L. , Droppo, I. G. , Gomez, E. A. , and Murphy, T. (2003). The stability of a remediated bed in Hamilton Harbour, Lake Ontario, Canada. Sedimentology 50, 149–168.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | CAS | Berkhout N. (1994). ‘Manual “UHCM”, Ultra High Concentration Meter.’ (Delft Hydraulics: The Netherlands.)

Bura, R. , Cheung, M. , Liao, B. , Finlayson, J. , and Lee, B. C. , et al. (1998). Composition of extracellular polymeric substances in the activated sludge floc matrix. Water Science and Technology 37, 325–333.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | CAS | Chapman L. J., and Putnam D. F. (1984). ‘The Physiography of Southern Ontario.’ (Ministry of Natural Resources: Toronto, Canada.)

Cyr, H. , and Morton, K. E. (2006). Distribution of biofilm exopolymeric substances in littoral sediments of Canadian Shield lakes: the effects of light and substrate. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 63, 1763–1776.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | CAS | Droppo I. G., Liss S. N., Williams D., and Leppard G. G. (2006). River sediment/pathogen interactions: Importance for policy development on safe water practices. In ‘Sediment Dynamics and the Hydromorphology of Fluvial Systems. IAHS Pub. No. 306’. (Eds J. Rowan, R. Duck and A. Werritty.) pp. 314–321. (IAHS Press: Wallingford, UK.)

Droppo, I. G. , Ross, N. , Skafel, M. , and Liss, S. (2007a). Biostabilization of cohesive sediment beds in a freshwater wave dominated environment. Limnology and Oceanography 52, 577–589.
|  CAS | Krumbein W. E., Paterson D. M., and Stal L. J. (Eds) (1994). ‘Biostabilization of Sediments’. (Verlag: Oldenburg, Germany.)

Lau, Y. L. , and Droppo, I. G. (2000). Influence of antecedent conditions on critical shear stress of bed sediments. Water Research 34, 663–667.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | CAS | Paterson D. M. (1997). Biological mediation of sediment erodibility: ecology and physical dynamics. In ‘Cohesive Sediments’. (Eds N. Burt, R. Parker and J. Watts.) pp. 215–229. (John Wiley and Sons Ltd: New York.)

Paterson D. M., Yallop M., and George C. (1994). Stabilization. In ‘Biostabilization of Sediments.’ (Eds W. E. Krumbein, D. M. Paterson and L. J. Stal.) pp. 401–432. (Springer-Verlag: New York.)

Stone, M. , Krishnappan, B. G. , and Emelko, M. B. (2008). The effect of bed age and shear stress on the particle morphology of eroded cohesive river sediment in an annular flume. Water Research 42, 4179–4187.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | CAS | PubMed | Wingender J., Neu T. R., and Flemming H.-C. (Eds) (1999). ‘Microbial Extracellular Polymeric Substances.’ (Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg.)

Wolfaardt, G. M. , Lawrence, J. R. , Robarts, R. D. , Caldwell, S. J. , and Caldwell, D. E. (1994). Multicellular organization in a degradative biofilm community. Applied and Environmental Microbiology 60, 434–446.
|  CAS | PubMed |

Wotton, R. S. (2004). The essential role of exopolymers (EPS) in aquatic systems. Oceanography and Marine Biology: An Annual Review 42, 57–94.