Free Standard AU & NZ Shipping For All Book Orders Over $80!
Register      Login
Marine and Freshwater Research Marine and Freshwater Research Society
Advances in the aquatic sciences
Shopping Cart: ( empty )
You are here: Home > Journals > MF > MF06218
RESEARCH ARTICLE
Contents Vol 58(7)

Habitat type promotes rapid and extremely localised genetic differentiation in dolphins

Luciana M. Möller A B C , Joanna Wiszniewski A B , Simon J. Allen A and Luciano B. Beheregaray B
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations

A Marine Mammal Research Group, Graduate School of the Environment, Macquarie University, NSW 2109, Australia.

B Molecular Ecology Group for Marine Research, Department of Biological Sciences, Macquarie University, NSW 2109, Australia.

C Corresponding author. Email: luciana.moller@gse.mq.edu.au

Marine and Freshwater Research 58(7) 640-648 https://doi.org/10.1071/MF06218
Submitted: 20 November 2006  Accepted: 21 May 2007   Published: 27 July 2007

Abstract

The high potential for dispersal of many marine organisms often results in low population differentiation over large distances. Here, we report that dolphin communities living in very close geographic proximity (<16 km) but in two different environments – open coast and enclosed embayment – exhibit unexpected genetic differentiation at nine microsatellite loci. Results based on a fixation index and a Bayesian clustering approach suggested that gene flow between communities within an embayment is high, as is gene flow between coastal communities. However, lower gene flow between embayment and open coast communities translated into substantial genetic differentiation between dolphin communities from the two environments, and assignment of individuals into two populations. Along with patterns observed in 403 bp of the mitochondrial DNA control region, the results suggest that restriction of gene flow likely occurred in the last 6000 years, after coastal dolphins colonised the embayment. We hypothesise that factors such as fidelity to the local area and resource and behavioural specialisations may have played a major role in promoting and maintaining genetic subdivision between dolphins of the two environments. Importantly, our study shows that habitat type can rapidly promote extremely fine-scale genetic structure in a long-lived, highly mobile marine mammal.

Additional keywords: dispersal, Indo–Pacific bottlenose dolphin, phylogeography, population genetics, Tursiops aduncus.


Acknowledgements

Financial support was provided by Macquarie University. We thank O. and L. Griffiths for fieldwork support. J. Powell, A. Caccone, F. Balloux and P. Sunnucks provided comments on an earlier draft of the manuscript. This work was conducted under licence from the NSW Department of Environment and Conservation and approved by the Macquarie University Animal Ethics Committee.


References

Balloux, F. , and Lugon-Moulin, N. (2002). The estimation of population differentiation with microsatellite markers. Molecular Ecology 11, 155–165.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | PubMed | Curry B. E. , and Smith J. (1997). Phylogeographic structure of the bottlenose dolphin (Tursiops truncatus): Stock identification and implications for management. In ‘Molecular Genetics of Marine Mammals’. (Eds A. E. Dizon, S. J. Chivers and W. F. Perrin.) pp. 227–247. (Society for Marine Mammalogy: Lawrence, FL.)

Defran, R. H. , and Weller, D. W. (1999). The occurrence, distribution, and site fidelity of bottlenose dolphins (Tursiops truncatus) in San Diego, California. Marine Mammal Science 15, 366–380.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | Felsenstein J. (1997). PHYLIP v. 3.5c (phylogeny inference package) (University of Washington: Seattle, WA.)

Gaggiotti, O. E. , Lange, O. , Rassmann, K. , and Gliddon, C. (1999). A comparison of two indirect methods for estimating average levels of gene flow using microsatellite data. Molecular Ecology 8, 1513–1520.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | PubMed | Goodnight K. F. , and Queller D. C. (1998). ‘RELATEDNESS 5.4.’ Goodnight software. Available at http://www.bioc.rice.edu-kfg/Gsoft.html.

Goudet J. (2001). ‘FSTAT, a Program to Estimate and Test Gene Diversities and Fixation Indices (Version 2.9.3).’ Available at http://www.unil.ch/izea/softwares/fstat.html.

Hale, P. T. , Barreto, A. S. , and Ross, G. J. B. (2000). Comparative morphology and distribution of the aduncus and truncatus forms of bottlenose dolphin Tursiops in the Indian and Western Pacific Oceans. Aquatic Mammals 26, 101–110.
Manly B. F. J. (1997). ‘RT, a Program for Randomisation Testing, Version 2.1.’ (Centre for Applications of Statistics and Mathematics: University of Otago, Dunedin.)

Möller, L. M. , Allen, S. J. , and Harcourt, R. G. (2002). Group characteristics, site fidelity and abundance of bottlenose dolphins (Tursiops aduncus) in Jervis Bay and Port Stephens, southeastern Australia. Australian Mammalogy 24, 11–21.
Möller L. M. (2001). Social organization and genetic relationships of coastal bottlenose dolphins in southeastern Australia. PhD Thesis, Macquarie University, Sydney.

Möller, L. M. , and Beheregaray, L. B. (2001). Coastal bottlenose dolphins from southeastern Australia are Tursiops aduncus according to sequences of the mitochondrial DNA control region. Marine Mammal Science 17, 249–263.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | Rice D. W. (1998). ‘Marine Mammals of the World: Systematics and Distribution.’ (Society for Marine Mammalogy: Lawrence, FL.)

Rice, W. (1989). Analysing tables of statistical tests. Evolution 43, 223–225.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | Ross G. J. B. , and Cockcroft V. G. (1990). Comments on Australian bottlenose dolphins and the taxonomic status of Tursiops aduncus (Ehrenberg, 1832). In ‘The Bottlenose Dolphin’. (Eds S. Leatherwood and R. R. Reeves.) pp. 101–128. (Academic Press: San Diego, CA.)

Roy, P. S. (1984). Holocene sedimentation histories of estuaries in southeastern Australia. Western Australian Department of Conservation and Environment Bulletin 161, 23–59.
Schneider S. , Roessli D. , and Excoffier L. (2000). ‘Arlequin: A Software for Population Genetics Data Analysis.’ Ver 2.000. (Genetics and Biometry Lab, Department of Anthropology, University of Geneva: Geneva.)

Sellas, A. B. , Wells, R. S. , and Rosel, P. E. (2005). Mitochondrial and nuclear DNA analyses reveal fine scale geographic structure in bottlenose dolphins (Tursiops truncatus) in the Gulf of Mexico. Conservation Genetics 6, 715–728.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | Wells R. S. , Scott M. D. , and Irvine A. B. (1987). The social structure of free-ranging bottlenose dolphins. In ‘Current Mammalogy’. (Ed. H. H. Genoways.) pp. 247–305. (Plenum Press: New York.)

Weir, B. S. , and Cockerham, C. C. (1984). Estimating F-statistics for the analysis of population structure. Evolution 38, 1358–1370.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |





Appendix 1. Allelic frequencies for each bottlenose dolphin community at nine microsatellite loci and number of individuals genotyped at each locus
Alleles private to the coastal* and embayment** communities
Click to zoom