Free Standard AU & NZ Shipping For All Book Orders Over $80!
Register      Login
Marine and Freshwater Research Marine and Freshwater Research Society
Advances in the aquatic sciences
RESEARCH ARTICLE

Patterns of periphyton chlorophyll and dry mass in a neotropical stream: a cheap and rapid analysis using a hand-held fluorometer

Timothy P. Moulton A E , Marcelo L. Souza B , Taldi L. Walter C and Felipe A. M. Krsulović D
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations

A Departmento de Ecologia, IBRAG, Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro, Rua São Francisco Xavier 524, Rio de Janeiro, RJ 20550-013, Brazil.

B INCRA, Superintendência Regional do Maranhão - SR 12, Av. Santos Dumont 18, Bairro Anil, São Luís, MA 65046-660, Brazil.

C National Audubon Society, 1150 Connecticut Avenue, NW #600, Washington, DC 20036, USA.

D Departamento de Ecologia, Estación Costera de Investigaciones Marinas and Center for Advanced Studies in Ecology and Biodiversity, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Castilla 114 -D, Santiago, Chile.

E Corresponding author. Email: moulton@uerj.br

Marine and Freshwater Research 60(3) 224-233 https://doi.org/10.1071/MF08081
Submitted: 14 March 2008  Accepted: 23 October 2008   Published: 27 March 2009

Abstract

Periphyton distribution is affected by various physical, chemical and biological factors at different scales. In the present study, a cheap and rapid method of measurement was used to obtain the many samples necessary for spatial analysis of periphyton along an altitudinal gradient in a low-order stream in south-east Brazilian Atlantic rain-forest. Fluorescence and turbidity were measured using a hand-held fluorometer and calibrated to the chlorophyll and dry mass of periphyton. Periphyton on the horizontal and vertical surfaces of different boulders was examined and shading and water current were measured as covariables. The three upstream sites with higher abundances of potentially grazing and bioturbing shrimps and mayflies had significantly less periphyton dry mass than the three downstream sites. Chlorophyll was positively related to water current, but not to shading. Variabilities in the dry mass and chlorophyll among boulders within sites were not associated with the distribution of shrimps and mayflies. The in vivo measurement was cheap, rapid, sensitive and reasonably precise compared with standard methods. The necessary sacrifice of detail of pigments (different chlorophylls and pheophytin) and dry mass (organic and inorganic constituents) and probably precision was compensated for by the insights gained from the ability to obtain a large number of samples in a hierarchical design.

Additional keywords: biofilm, current, epilithon, hierarchical design, nested analysis, shade.


Acknowledgements

The Centre for Environmental Studies and Sustainable Development, a campus of UERJ at Ilha Grande, supplied logistical support and hospitality for which we are greatly appreciative. We thank our colleagues who helped with field and laboratory work. Rodolfo Paranhos of Laboratório de Hidrobiologia, UFRJ, provided the analyses of chlorophyll and technical support for the Aquafluor. Marcus Wellington A. de Moraes from Lunus interfaced with Turner Designs and repaired our instrument free of charge. Three anonymous referees improved the manuscript considerably. Marcelo Luiz de Souza received a doctoral scholarship from FAPERJ. Felipe A. M. Krsulović received a Masters scholarship from CNPq. Taldi L. Walter received a Travel Abroad Grant to study in Brazil from the University of Central Arkansas. This research was supported by grants 351037/1999-3 and 476951/2004-6 from CNPq.


References

Aberle, N. , Beutler, M. , Moldaenke, C. , and Wiltshire, K. H. (2006). ‘Spectral fingerprinting’ for specific algal groups on sediments in situ: a new sensor. Archiv für Hydrobiologie 167, 575–592.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | CAS | Hill W. R. (1996). Effects of light. In ‘Algal Ecology: Freshwater Benthic Ecosystems’. (Eds R. J. Stevenson, M. L. Bothwell and R. L. Lowe.) pp. 121–148. (Academic Press: San Diego.)

Hill, W. R. , and Knight, A. W. (1987). Experimental analysis of the grazing interaction between a mayfly and stream algae. Ecology 68, 1955–1965.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | Krsulović F. A. M. (2004). Avaliação de mecanismos de remoção de perifiton por ninfas de Ephemeroptera em um córrego, Ilha Grande, Brasil. MSc Thesis, Pós-graduação em Biologia, Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro.

Loeb, S. L. (1981). An in situ method for measuring the primary productivity and standing crop of the epilithic periphyton community in lentic systems. Limnology and Oceanography 26, 394–399.
Parsons T. R., Maita Y., and Lalli C. M. (1984). ‘A Manual of Chemical and Biological Methods for Seawater Analysis.’ (Pergamon Press: Oxford.)

Pringle, C. M. (1996). Atyid shrimps (Decapoda : Atyidae) influence the spatial heterogeneity of algal communities over different scales in tropical montane streams, Puerto Rico. Freshwater Biology 35, 125–140.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | Steinman A. D., and Lamberti G. A. (1996). Biomass and pigments of benthic algae. In ‘Methods in Stream Ecology’. (Eds F. R. Hauer and G. A. Lamberti.) pp. 295–313. (Academic Press: San Diego.)

Steinman, A. D. , and McIntire, C. D. (1986). Effects of current velocity and light energy on the structure of periphyton assemblages in laboratory streams. Journal of Phycology 22, 352–361.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | Stevenson R. J. (1996). The stimulation and drag of current. In ‘Algal Ecology: Freshwater Benthic Ecosystems’. (Eds R. J. Stevenson, M. L. Bothwell and R. L. Lowe.) pp. 321–340. (Academic Press: San Diego.)

Stevenson R. J., Bothwell M. L., and Lowe R. L. (1996). ‘Algal Ecology: Freshwater Benthic Ecosystems.’ (Academic Press: San Diego.)

Underwood A. J. (1997). ‘Experiments in Ecology.’ (Cambridge University Press: Cambridge.)

Wellnitz, T. A. , Rader, R. B. , and Ward, J. V. (1996). Light and a grazing mayfly shape periphyton in a Rocky Mountain stream. Journal of the North American Benthological Society 15, 496–507.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |