Surface cleaning and disinfection: insight into the situation in Germany and Europe
Jürgen Gebel A B , Stefanie Gemein A and Martin Exner AA Institute of Hygiene and Public Health, University of Bonn, Sigmund-Freud-Str. 25, Bonn D-53127, Germany.
B Corresponding author. Email: Juergen.Gebel@ukb.uni-bonn.de
Healthcare Infection 18(1) 31-36 https://doi.org/10.1071/HI12054
Submitted: 7 November 2012 Accepted: 20 December 2012 Published: 28 February 2013
Abstract
Introduction: Routine disinfection of frequently touched environmental surfaces and floors has been a controversial issue in hospital hygiene strategies. In view of the rise in multi-resistant micro-organisms and with more attention being paid to nosocomial infections and outbreaks occurring in community settings, environmental disinfection is being increasingly recognised as an important contribution to infection prevention.
Discussion: Environmental concerns regarding the use of chemical disinfectants and the lack of epidemiological data are frequently mentioned as an argument against routine disinfection. While the exact extent of the impact of contaminated surfaces on the rate of infections is difficult to establish, there is sufficient evidence for the possibility of cross-contamination from surfaces to patients and staff, and vice-versa, to make surface disinfection indispensable. Effective disinfection is dependent on risk assessment, on the use of products with tested efficacy, on suitable application methods and on the evaluation and monitoring of disinfection. The German Hospital Hygiene and Infection Prevention Commission (KRINKO) addresses these aspects in its very detailed recommendation ‘Hygiene Requirements on the Cleaning and Disinfection of Surfaces’. The German Association for Applied Hygiene (VAH) develops test methods and compiles a list of tested and certified disinfectant products to ensure product effectiveness. Public health authorities in Germany support the use of certified disinfectants. On a European level, much effort is put into the development of internationally acceptable practice-relevant test protocols for efficacy testing of disinfectants.
Conclusion: Surface disinfection should be viewed as part of a bundle of strategies in hospital hygiene. In order to ensure effective disinfection, the use of properly tested disinfectant products is essential. VAH aims to create a platform for tested disinfectants that is recognised European-wide. In addition, detailed recommendations on the prerequisites for effective surface disinfection processes, such as issued by KRIKNO, should be provided.
References
[1] Exner M. Divergent opinions on surface disinfection: myths or prevention? A review of the literature. GMS Krankenhhyg Interdiszip 2007; 2 19[2] Rutala WA, Weber DJ. Surface disinfection: should we do it? J Hosp Infect 2001; 48 S64–8.
| Surface disinfection: should we do it?Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[3] Dharan S, Mourouga P, Copin P, Bessmer G, Tschanz B, Pittet D. Routine disinfection of patients’ environmental surfaces. Myth or reality? J Hosp Infect 1999; 42 113–7.
| Routine disinfection of patients’ environmental surfaces. Myth or reality?Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:STN:280:DyaK1Mzhslaqsw%3D%3D&md5=19023612875ceb9bf0cbb9cf78a2473aCAS |
[4] Cozad A, Jones RD. Disinfection and the prevention of infectious disease. Am J Infect Control 2003; 31 243–54.
| Disinfection and the prevention of infectious disease.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[5] Otter JA, Yezli S, French GL. The role played by contaminated surfaces in the transmission of nosocomial pathogens. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2011; 32 687–99.
| The role played by contaminated surfaces in the transmission of nosocomial pathogens.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[6] Zur Entwicklung nosokomialer Infektionen im Krankenhausinfektions-Surveillance-Service (KISS). In: Epidemiologisches Bulletin 5/2011. Berlin: Robert Koch Institut; 2011. Available online at: http://www.rki.de/DE/Content/Infekt/EpidBull/Archiv/2011/Ausgaben/05_11.pdf;jsessionid=95B484293FEC617D4BB22CAD89E1B723.2_cid226?__blob=publicationFile [verified 6 February 2013].
[7] Kramer A, Schwebke I, Kampf G. How long do nosocomial pathogens persist on inanimate surfaces? A systematic review. BMC Infect Dis 2006; 6 130
| How long do nosocomial pathogens persist on inanimate surfaces? A systematic review.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[8] Shaughnessy JD. Cancer: An unexpected addiction. Nature 2008; 454 172–3.
| Cancer: An unexpected addiction.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD1cXot1ygsrs%3D&md5=bcda4553518b9ea6479c5d2423c27175CAS |
[9] Huang SS, Datta R, Platt R. Risk of acquiring antibiotic-resistant bacteria from prior room occupants. Arch Intern Med 2006; 166 1945–51.
| Risk of acquiring antibiotic-resistant bacteria from prior room occupants.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[10] Jarvis WR, Ostrowsky B. Dinosaurs, methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus, and infection control personnel: survival through translating science into prevention. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2003; 24 392–6.
| Dinosaurs, methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus, and infection control personnel: survival through translating science into prevention.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[11] RKI Anforderungen an die Hygiene bei der Reinigung und Desinfektion von Flächen. Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz 2004; 47 51–61.
| Anforderungen an die Hygiene bei der Reinigung und Desinfektion von Flächen.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[12] Exner M, Vacata V, Hornei B, Dietlein E, Gebel J. Household cleaning and surface disinfection: new insights and strategies. J Hosp Infect 2004; 56 70–5.
| Household cleaning and surface disinfection: new insights and strategies.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[13] Maillard JY. Bacterial target sites for biocide action. J Appl Microbiol 2002; 92 16S–27S.
| Bacterial target sites for biocide action.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[14] Maillard JY. Antimicrobial biocides in the healthcare environment: efficacy, usage, policies, and perceived problems. Ther Clin Risk Manag 2005; 1 307–20.
[15] Gebel J, Werner HP, Kirsch-Altena A, Bansemir K. Standardmethoden der DGHM zur Prüfung und Bewertung chemischer Desinfektionsverfahren. Wiesbaden: mhp-Verlag; 2001.
[16] DGHM. Anforderungskatalog für die Aufnahme von chemischen Desinfektionsverfahren in die Desinfektionsmittel-Liste der DGHM – Stand 4.2.2002. Wiesbaden: mhp-Verlag; 2002.
[17] VAH. VAH List of Disinfectants – Issue: 1.4.2012. Wiesbaden: mhp-Verlag; 2012.
[18] CEN. prEN 14885 – Chemical disinfectants and antiseptics – Application of European Standards for chemical disinfectants and antiseptics. Brussels: European Committee for Standardization (CEN); 2006.
[19] CEN. WI00216084 – Chemical disinfectants and antiseptics – Quantitative carrier test for the evaluation of bactericidal and yeasticidal activity on non-porous surfaces with mechanical actions in the medical area – Test method and requirements (phase 2, step 2). Brussels: European Committee for Standardization (CEN); 2012.
[20] CEN. WI00216068 – Chemical disinfectants and antiseptics – Quantitative suspension test for the evaluation of sporicidal activity in the medical area — Test method and requirements (phase 2, step 1). Brussels: European Committee for Standardization (CEN); 2011.
[21] Gemein S. Etablierung eines Testverfahrens zur Prüfung sporizider Flächendesinfektionsmitt mit dem Schwerpunkt Clostridium difficilie Ribotyp 027. Bonn: Mathematisch-Naturwissenschaftliche Fakultät – Rheinische Friedrich-Wilhelm-Universität; 2011.
[22] Koch R. Über Desinfektion. Mitteilungen aus dem Kaiserl. Gesundheitsamte, 1881, Bd. I, Berlin. In: Schwalbe J, ed. Gesammelte Werke von Robert Koch (Band 1). Leipzig: Verlag von Georg Thieme; 1912: pp. 287–338.