Assessment of current antimicrobial stewardship policies and resources: a focus group project
Darren K. Pasay A D , Sheldon J. S. Chow A , Lauren C. Bresee A B , Micheal Guirguis A C and Jeremy Slobodan AA Drug Stewardship, Pharmacy Services, Alberta Health Services, Alberta, Canada.
B Department of Community Health Sciences, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
C Faculty of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.
D Corresponding author. Email: darren.pasay@albertahealthservices.ca
Healthcare Infection 20(1) 7-15 https://doi.org/10.1071/HI14025
Submitted: 6 August 2014 Accepted: 7 October 2014 Published: 16 December 2014
Abstract
Introduction: Antimicrobial stewardship (AS) within acute care facilities is a requirement for Accreditation Canada’s Required Organisational Practices. In order to obtain a baseline evaluation of current AS processes, a focus group approach was used to qualitatively assess frontline pharmacy staff and leadership perspectives on AS resources.
Methods: A semi-structured interview process was applied to focus groups comprised of Pharmacy Services employees throughout Alberta Health Services in Alberta, Canada. A thematic analysis of transcripts was done independently by two investigators, and consensus was reached on identified themes and topics. Codes were recorded for prevalence and total number of mentions. A combination of conventional and deductive approaches was used to identify themes.
Results: A total of 200 (10%) pharmacy services staff members participated in the focus groups. Eight main themes were identified: antimicrobial resources, influences on antimicrobial utilisation, barriers to antimicrobial stewardship, establishing AS teams, education needs, improving communications, antimicrobial utilisation concerns, and enablers for improvement. Two hundred and six topics were identified to support the themes, with 1924 data points. Prominent topics included ubiquitous awareness of a provincial antimicrobial stewardship reference, prescriber preferences influencing antimicrobial utilisation, and desire to improve interprofessional teamwork, communication and educational opportunities.
Conclusions: A broad description of the culture of antimicrobial use showed that the themes are interrelated. To successfully change practice, one must take into account the complexity of the relationship between these perceptions.
References
[1] Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Antibiotic resistance threats in the United States. Atlanta: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services; 2013.[2] Dellit TH, Owens RC, McGowan JE, Gerding DN, Weinstein RA, Burke JP, Huskins WC, Paterson DL, Fishman NO, Carpenter CF, Brennan PJ, Billeter M, Hooton TM. Infectious Diseases Society of America and the Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America guidelines for developing an institutional program to enhance antimicrobial stewardship. Clin Infect Dis 2007; 44 159–77.
| Infectious Diseases Society of America and the Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America guidelines for developing an institutional program to enhance antimicrobial stewardship.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 17173212PubMed |
[3] The Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America, the Infectious Diseases Society of America and the Pediatric Infectious Diseases Society .
[4] Davey P, Brown E, Fenelon L, Finch R, Gould I, Hartman G, Holmes A, Ramsay C, Taylor E, Wilcox M, Wiffen P. Interventions to improve antibiotic prescribing practices for hospital inpatients. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2013; CD003543
| 23633313PubMed |
[5] Accreditation Canada. Required Organizations Practices Handbook. Ottawa: Accreditation Canada; 2014. Available from: http://www.accreditation.ca/sites/default/files/report-on-rops-en.pdf [verified October 2014]
[6] ASHP. ASHP statement on the pharmacist’s role in antimicrobial stewardship and infection prevention and control. Am J Health Syst Pharm 2010; 67 575–7.
| ASHP statement on the pharmacist’s role in antimicrobial stewardship and infection prevention and control.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 20237387PubMed |
[7] Charani E, Edwards R, Sevdalis N, Alexandrou B, Sibley E, Mullett D, Franklin BD, Holmes A. Behaviour change strategies to influence antimicrobial prescribing in acute care: a systematic review. Clin Infect Dis 2011; 53 651–62.
| Behaviour change strategies to influence antimicrobial prescribing in acute care: a systematic review.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 21890770PubMed |
[8] De Souza V, MacFarlane A, Murphy AW, Hanahoe B, Barber A, Cormican M. A qualitative study of factors influencing antimicrobial prescribing by non-consultant hospital doctors. J Antimicrob Chemother 2006; 58 840–3.
| A qualitative study of factors influencing antimicrobial prescribing by non-consultant hospital doctors.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD28Xps1yjsbc%3D&md5=be55db9ac0a4c12d799ea7048e25c2ccCAS | 16885179PubMed |
[9] Giblin TB, Sinkowitz-Cochran RL, Harris PL, Jacobs S, Liberatore K, Palfreyman MA, Harrison EI, Cardo DM., CDC Campaign to Prevent Antimicrobial Resistance Team Clinicians’ perceptions of the problem of antimicrobial resistance in health care facilities. Arch Intern Med 2004; 164 1662–8.
| Clinicians’ perceptions of the problem of antimicrobial resistance in health care facilities.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 15302636PubMed |
[10] Charani E, Castro-Sanchez E, Sevdalis N, Kyratsis Y, Drumright L, Shah N, Holmes A. Understanding the determinants of antimicrobial prescribing within hospitals: the role of ‘prescribing etiquette’. Clin Infect Dis 2013; 57 188–96.
| Understanding the determinants of antimicrobial prescribing within hospitals: the role of ‘prescribing etiquette’.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:STN:280:DC%2BC3srjvVakug%3D%3D&md5=ef53922e021c6a7fbea809a3dc03a801CAS | 23572483PubMed |
[11] Cortoos PJ, De Witte K, Peetermans WE, Simoens S, Laekeman G. Opposing expectations and suboptimal use of a local antibiotic hospital guideline: a qualitative study. J Antimicrob Chemother 2008; 62 189–95.
| Opposing expectations and suboptimal use of a local antibiotic hospital guideline: a qualitative study.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD1cXnt1Sms74%3D&md5=f659d1c2ed81e89ea1a5de91d6299c09CAS | 18397925PubMed |
[12] Sandelowski M, Leeman J. Writing usable qualitative health research findings. Qual Health Res 2012; 22 1404–13.
| Writing usable qualitative health research findings.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 22745362PubMed |
[13] Health Canada.Canada Health Act. 2012. Available from: http://laws-lois.justice.gc.ca/PDF/C-6.pdf [verified October 2014]
[14] Hsieh HF, Shannon SE. Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qual Health Res 2005; 15 1277–88.
| Three approaches to qualitative content analysis.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 16204405PubMed |
[15] Bradley EH, Curry LA, Devers KJ. Qualitative data analysis for health services research: developing taxonomy, themes, and theory. Health Serv Res 2007; 42 1758–72.
| 17286625PubMed |
[16] Zhang Y, Wildemuth BM. Qualitative analysis of content. Applications of social research methods to questions in information and library science 2009; 308–19.
[17] Health Research Ethics Board of Alberta. A pRoject Ethics Community Consensus Initiative (ARECCI) screening tool. Available from: www.aihealthsolutions.ca/arecci/screening/ [verified October 2014]
[18] Health Research Ethics Board of Alberta. A pRoject Ethics Community Consensus Initiative (ARECCI) Ethics Guidelines for Quality Improvement and Evaluation Projects. Available from: http://www.aihealthsolutions.ca/arecci/guidelines/ [verified October 2014]
[19] Blondel-Hill E, Fryters S. Bugs & Drugs 2012. Edmonton: Alberta Health Services; 2012 Available from: http://www.bugsanddrugs.ca [verified October 2014]
[20] Gilbert DN, Chambers HF, Eliopoulos GM, Saag MS, Black D, Freedman DO, Pavia AT, Schwartz B. Sanford Guide to Antimicrobial Therapy. 43rd edn. Available from: www.sanfordguide.com [verified October 2014]
[21] Kotter JP. Corporate culture and performance. New York: Simon and Schuster; 2008.
[22] Rosenthal M, Austin Z, Tsuyuki R. Are pharmacists the ultimate barrier to pharmacy practice change? CPJ 2010; 143 37–42.
[23] Paskovaty A, Pflomm JM, Myke N, Seo SK. A multidisciplinary approach to antimicrobial stewardship: evolution into the 21st century. Int J Antimicrob Agents 2005; 25 1–10.
| A multidisciplinary approach to antimicrobial stewardship: evolution into the 21st century.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD2cXhtFGhsL%2FL&md5=952b8c8a44ae5aa64cf3edd6c515c6c5CAS | 15620820PubMed |
[24] Patel D, Lawson W, Guglielmo BJ. Antimicrobial stewardship programs: interventions and associated outcomes. Expert Rev Anti Infect Ther 2008; 6 209–22.
| Antimicrobial stewardship programs: interventions and associated outcomes.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 18380603PubMed |
[25] Schouten JA, Hulcher ME, Natsch N, Kullberg BJ, van der Meer JW, Grol RP. Barriers to optimal antibiotic use for community-acquired pneumonia at hospital: a qualitative study. Qual Saf Health Care 2007; 16 143–9.
| 17403764PubMed |
[26] Groups Plus. Focus group research: why the traditional research methodology works so effectively and why it deserves to be the most respected of all qualitative research tools? Groups Plus, Inc.; 2004. Available from: http://www.groupsplus.com/pages/Respect3.htm [verified October 2014].