Implementing hand hygiene strategies in the operating suite
Elizabeth Reika Bellaard-Smith A B and Elizabeth E. Gillespie AA Infection Control and Epidemiology, Monash Medical Centre, 246 Clayton Road, Clayton, Vic. 3168, Australia.
B Corresponding author. Email: liza.smith@southernhealth.org.au
Healthcare Infection 17(1) 33-37 https://doi.org/10.1071/HI12002
Submitted: 13 January 2012 Accepted: 6 March 2012 Published: 5 April 2012
Abstract
Background: As the five moments of hand hygiene for the operating suite (OS) and post acute care unit (PACU) had not been defined, we were finding it difficult to communicate expectations for hand hygiene. Hand hygiene auditing was undertaken when reviewing infection control practice in our OS. We observed that although hand rub was accessible, understanding hand hygiene compliance was limited and inconsistent. The challenge was to feedback results to the OS and PACU teams using a consistent methodology.
Methods: Monitoring hand hygiene compliance in the operating suite commenced in 2007 and was aimed at establishing a baseline and identifying areas for improvement. A hand hygiene improvement project for the OS commenced in 2009 which involved engagement of OS staff to work with infection control staff to monitor practice, provide education and implement changes. Hand profiling was used to demonstrate hand hygiene technique, monthly infection control meetings to review project achievements and regular hand hygiene auditing of the five moments were undertaken by OS staff.
Results: This project resulted in the development of an OS tool, adapted from the Hand Hygiene Australia audit tool. An education package was also developed that explained the five moments of hand hygiene, the patient environment specific to the OS, cleaning requirements between each patient and instruction on appropriate glove use, correct hand hygiene technique and hand care. Hand hygiene compliance improved from 11% in 2007 to 59% in 2011 (P < 0.001).
Conclusion: Infection control collaboration with OS staff was constructive and assisted in the implementation of change. Our project enabled expectations to be communicated and understood with the development of a specific tool and education package. We now have the opportunity to benchmark across our 28 operating rooms and with others.
References
[1] World Health Organisation. WHO Guidelines on Hand Hygiene in Healthcare. http://passthrough.fw-notify.net/download/670172/http://whqlibdoc.who.int/publications/2009/9789241597906_eng.pdf [Last accessed January 2011].[2] Hand Hygiene Australia. Hand hygiene auditing tool http://www.hha.org.au/ForHealthcareWorkers/auditing.aspx [Last accessed January 2011].
[3] Gillespie E, Kotsanas D, Wilson J, Buist M, Stuart R. Hand profiling: a novel tool used to demonstrate hand hygiene technique. Healthc Infect 2009; 14 153–7.
| Hand profiling: a novel tool used to demonstrate hand hygiene technique.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[4] Wenzel R. Prevention and Control of Nosocomial Infections. Chapter 26, p515. 1997. (Third Edition.)
[5] Widmer A. Replace Hand Washing with Use of a Waterless Alcohol Hand Rub? Clin Infect Dis 2000; 31 136–43.
| Replace Hand Washing with Use of a Waterless Alcohol Hand Rub?Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:STN:280:DC%2BD3M%2FhvV2ltw%3D%3D&md5=9ac6ddb5e31b90c6f1ee767774da2f70CAS |
[6] Pittet D. Hand Hygiene: It’s all about when and how. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2008; 29 957–9.
| Hand Hygiene: It’s all about when and how.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[7] Mangram AJ, Horan TC, Pearson ML, Silver LC, Jarvis WR. CDC Guidelines for Prevention of Surgical Site Infection, 1999. Am J Infect Control 1999; 27 97–134.
| CDC Guidelines for Prevention of Surgical Site Infection, 1999.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:STN:280:DyaK1M3htl2htg%3D%3D&md5=b9fdaefc9a71e555359562253aaa8073CAS |
[8] Edmiston C, Cambria R, Brown K, Lewis B, Sommers J, Krepel C, et al Molecular epidemiology of microbial contamination in the operating room environment: Is there a risk for infection? Surgery 2005; 138 573–582.
| Molecular epidemiology of microbial contamination in the operating room environment: Is there a risk for infection?Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[9] Woodhead K, Taylor EW, Bannister G, Chesworth T, Hoffman P, Humphreys H. Behaviours and rituals in the operating theatre. J Hosp Infect 2002; 51 241–55.
| Behaviours and rituals in the operating theatre.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:STN:280:DC%2BD38vis1Glsg%3D%3D&md5=afc892bb9445989ad9acef635cbe91f8CAS |
[10] Loftus RW, Muffly MK, Brown JR, Beach ML, Koff MD, Corwin HL, et al Hand Contamination of Anaesthesia Providers Is an Important Risk Factor for Intraoperative Bacterial Transmission. Anesth Analg 2011; 112 98–105.
| Hand Contamination of Anaesthesia Providers Is an Important Risk Factor for Intraoperative Bacterial Transmission.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[11] Snyder G, Thom K, Furuno J, Perencevich E, Roghmann M-C. Strauss, Netzer G., Harris A. Detection of Methicillin-Resistant Staphlococcus aureus and Vancomycin-Resistant Enterocci on the Gowns and Gloves of Healthcare Workers. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2008; 29 583–9.
| Strauss, Netzer G., Harris A. Detection of Methicillin-Resistant Staphlococcus aureus and Vancomycin-Resistant Enterocci on the Gowns and Gloves of Healthcare Workers.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[12] Roy R, Brull S, Eichorn J. Surgical Site Infections and the Anesthesia Professionals’ Microbiome: We’ve All Been Slimed! Now What Are We Going to Do About It? Anaesthesia & Analgesia 2011; 112 4–7.
[13] Goodman E, Platt R, Bass R, Onderdonk A, Yokoe D, Huang S. Impact of an Environmental Cleaning Intervention on the Presence of Methicillin-Resistant Enterococcus on Surfaces in Intensive Care Unit Rooms. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2008; 29 593–9.
| Impact of an Environmental Cleaning Intervention on the Presence of Methicillin-Resistant Enterococcus on Surfaces in Intensive Care Unit Rooms.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[14] Weber W, Zwahlen M, Reck S, Feder-Mengus C, Misteli H, Rosenthal R, et al ‘Economic Burden of Surgical Site Infections at a European University Hospital’. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2008; 29 623–9.
| ‘Economic Burden of Surgical Site Infections at a European University Hospital’.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[15] Anderson DJ, Kaye KS, Classen D, Arias KM, Podgorney K, Burstin H, et al Strategies to Prevent Surgical Site Infection in Acute Care Hospitals. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2008; 29 S51–61.
| Strategies to Prevent Surgical Site Infection in Acute Care Hospitals.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[16] Owens CD, Stoessel K. ‘Surgical site infections: epidemiology, microbiology and prevention’. J Hosp Infect 2008; 70 3–10.
| ‘Surgical site infections: epidemiology, microbiology and prevention’.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[17] Pittet D, Hugonnet S, Harbath S, Mourouga P, Sauvan V, Touveneau S, et al Effectiveness of a hospital-wide programme to improve compliance with hand hygiene. Lancet 2000; 356 1307–12.
| Effectiveness of a hospital-wide programme to improve compliance with hand hygiene.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:STN:280:DC%2BD3crhsVSltQ%3D%3D&md5=ab0a299e4c6a1ba2a33fea40b838d538CAS |
[18] Knobben BAS, van Horn JR, van der Mei HC, Busscher HJ. Evaluation of measures to decrease intra-operative bacterial contamination in orthopaedic implant surgery. J Hosp Infect 2006; 62 174–80.
| Evaluation of measures to decrease intra-operative bacterial contamination in orthopaedic implant surgery.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:STN:280:DC%2BD28%2Fhs1emtQ%3D%3D&md5=33ad0680e2a3143d9a5479c1c6986d28CAS |