Auditing hand hygiene rates for quality and improvement
Deborough Macbeth A B D and Cathryn Murphy A B CA Infection Control Department, Gold Coast Hospital, 108 Nerang Street, Southport, Qld 4215, Australia.
B School of Nursing and Midwifery, Griffith University, Gold Coast, Qld 4215, Australia.
C Faculty of Health Sciences and Medicine, Bond University, Robina, Qld 4229, Australia.
D Corresponding author. Email: deborough_macbeth@health.qld.gov.au
Healthcare Infection 17(1) 13-17 https://doi.org/10.1071/HI11030
Submitted: 22 December 2011 Accepted: 27 February 2012 Published: 5 April 2012
Abstract
Since the work of Ignaz Philipp Semmelweis, hand hygiene has been recognised as an effective means of preventing healthcare-associated infection. More recently, the World Health Organisation developed guidelines and strategies for improving hand hygiene compliance which have subsequently been adopted and implemented in healthcare facilities around the world. In Australia the imperative to ensure appropriate hand hygiene as a component of safe healthcare provision has been supported and promoted at state and national levels by various bodies. However, in spite of improvements in compliance rates and reported decreases in multi-resistant organisms, criticism has arisen around the commitment of scarce healthcare resources to hand hygiene auditing. This study demonstrates that hand hygiene audits can contribute to quality healthcare delivery and improvement.
References
[1] World Health Organization. WHO guidelines for hand hygiene in health care. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2009.[2] Randle J, Clarke M, Storr J. Hand hygiene compliance in healthcare workers. J Hosp Infect 2006; 64 205–9.
| Hand hygiene compliance in healthcare workers.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[3] Marra AJ, Guastelli LR, Periera de Araujo CM, Saraiva dos Santos JL, Filho MAO, Silva CV, et al Positive deviance: a program for sustained improvement in hand hygiene compliance. Am J Infect Control 2011; 39 1–5.
| Positive deviance: a program for sustained improvement in hand hygiene compliance.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[4] Pittet D. Infection control and quality healthcare in the new millennium. Am J Infect Control 2005; 33 258–67.
| Infection control and quality healthcare in the new millennium.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[5] World Health Organisation. Clean Care is Safer Care http://www.who.int/gpsc/en/index.html (Last accessed 9th December 2011.)
[6] Hand Hygiene Australia. http://www.hha.org.au/home.aspx [Verified 9 December 2011.]
[7] Gould DJ, Drey NS, Creedon S. Routine hand hygiene audit by direct observation: has nemesis arrived? J Hosp Infect 2011; 77 290–3.
| Routine hand hygiene audit by direct observation: has nemesis arrived?Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[8] Boyce JM. Hand hygiene compliance monitoring: current perspectives from the USA. J Hosp Infect 2008; 70 2–7.
| Hand hygiene compliance monitoring: current perspectives from the USA.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[9] Health Quality and Complaints Commission. Quality of Health Services – Duty of Provider Standards. Brisbane: Health Quality and Complaints Commission, 2007.
[10] Assanasen S, Edmond M, Bearman G. Impact of 2 levels of performance feedback on compliance with infection control process measures in 2 intensive care units. Am J Infect Control 2008; 36 407–13.
| Impact of 2 levels of performance feedback on compliance with infection control process measures in 2 intensive care units.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[11] MacDonald A, Dinah F, Mackenzie D, Wilson A. performance feedback of hand hygiene using alcohol gel as the skin decontaminant reduces the number of inpatients newly affected by MRSA and antibiotic costs. J Hosp Infect 2004; 56 56–63.
| performance feedback of hand hygiene using alcohol gel as the skin decontaminant reduces the number of inpatients newly affected by MRSA and antibiotic costs.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |