Free Standard AU & NZ Shipping For All Book Orders Over $80!
Register      Login
Healthcare Infection Healthcare Infection Society
Official Journal of the Australasian College for Infection Prevention and Control
RESEARCH ARTICLE

Surveillance of surgical site infections after open heart surgery

Rosanna Loss A , Günter Marggraf B , J. Adam Piotrowski B , Jaroslaw Benedik B , Birgit Ross C D , Dorothea Hansen C , Heinz G. Jakob B and Walter Popp C
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations

A Department of Public Health, University of Verona, Strada Le Grazie, 37134 Verona, Italy.

B Department of Cardiac Surgery, University Hospital Essen, Hufelandstrasse 55, 45122 Essen, Germany.

C Hospital Hygiene, University Hospital Essen, Hufelandstrasse 55, 45122 Essen, Germany.

D Corresponding author. Email: birgit.ross@uk-essen.de

Healthcare Infection 17(2) 41-44 https://doi.org/10.1071/HI11028
Submitted: 21 November 2011  Accepted: 11 January 2012   Published: 1 May 2012

Abstract

Background: The aim of this study was to evaluate the incidence of surgical site infections (SSIs) following open heart surgery and to identify the most frequent risk factors for these infections.

Methods: A prospective surveillance was performed during the period from January 2011 to June 2011 at the Cardiac Surgery Intensive Care Unit of the Universitätsklinikum, Essen, Germany. Wound infections were defined according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) and USA National Nosocomial Infections Surveillance (NNIS) system criteria.

Results: In total, 405 patients were included; 84.4% were elective procedures, 60.0% represented by coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus screening was performed on 93.3% of patients, and perioperative antibiotic prophylaxis with a first-generation cephalosporin was administered in 94% of cases. SSIs occurred in seven patients (1.7%): two (0.5%) were superficial infections and five (1.2%) were deep infections. All infections occurred after CABG procedures and were diagnosed after discharge.

Conclusions: Preventing SSIs in the operating room is a primary goal for the surgical team. Although the incidence rate of SSIs is low, it is necessary to maintain continuous surveillance and to implement preventive measures.

Additional keywords: wound infection.


References

[1]  Graf K, Sohr D, Haverich A, Kühn C, Gastmeier P, Chaberny IF. Decrease of deep sternal surgical site infection rates after cardiac surgery by a comprehensive infection control program. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg 2009; 9 282–6.
Decrease of deep sternal surgical site infection rates after cardiac surgery by a comprehensive infection control program.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[2]  Salehi Omran A, Karimi A, Ahmadi SH, Davoodi S, Marzban M, Movahedi N, Abbasi K, Boroumand MA, Davoodi SA, Moshtaghi N. Superficial and deep sternal wound infection after more than 9000 coronary artery bypass graft (CABG): incidence, risk factors and mortality. BMC Infect Dis 2007; 7 112–17.
Superficial and deep sternal wound infection after more than 9000 coronary artery bypass graft (CABG): incidence, risk factors and mortality.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[3]  Sharma M, Barriel-Cass D, Baran J. Sternal surgical-site infection following coronary artery bypass graft: prevalence, microbiology, and complications during a 42-month period. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2004; 25 468–71.
Sternal surgical-site infection following coronary artery bypass graft: prevalence, microbiology, and complications during a 42-month period.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[4]  Beldi G, Bisch-Knaden S, Banz V, Mühlemann K, Candinas D. Impact of intraoperative behavior on surgical site infections. Am J Surg 2009; 198 157–62.
Impact of intraoperative behavior on surgical site infections.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[5]  Ridderstolpe L, Gill H, Granfeldt H, Ahlfeldt H, Rutberg H. Superficial and deep sternal wound complications: incidence, risk factors and mortality. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2001; 20 1168–75.
Superficial and deep sternal wound complications: incidence, risk factors and mortality.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:STN:280:DC%2BD3MnntFejug%3D%3D&md5=f0b2b4df6c9a493b3a362a4ad9bb9d4cCAS |

[6]  Tegnell A, Arén C, Öhmann L. Wound infections after cardiac surgery – a wound scoring system may improve early detection. Scand Cardiovasc J 2002; 36 60–4.
Wound infections after cardiac surgery – a wound scoring system may improve early detection.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[7]  Fakih MG, Sharma M, Khatib R, Berriel-Cass D, Meisner S, Harrington S, Saravolatz L. Increase in the rate of sternal surgical site infection after coronary artery bypass graft: a marker of higher severity of illness. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2007; 28 655–60.
Increase in the rate of sternal surgical site infection after coronary artery bypass graft: a marker of higher severity of illness.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[8]  Mastoraki A, Kriaras I, Douka E, Mastoraki S, Stravopodis G, Geroulanos S. Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus preventing strategy in cardiac surgery. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg 2008; 7 452–6.
Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus preventing strategy in cardiac surgery.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[9]  Muñoz P, Hortal J, Giannella M, Barrio JM, Rodríguez-Créixems M, Pérez MJ, Rincón C, Bouza E. Nasal carriage of S. aureus increases the risk of surgical site infection after major heart surgery. J Hosp Infect 2008; 68 25–31.
Nasal carriage of S. aureus increases the risk of surgical site infection after major heart surgery.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[10]  Lark RL, Van der Hyde K, Deeb GM, Dietrich S, Massey JP, Chenoweth C. An outbreak of coagulase-negative Staphylococcal surgical-site infections following aortic valve replacement. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2001; 22 618–23.
An outbreak of coagulase-negative Staphylococcal surgical-site infections following aortic valve replacement.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:STN:280:DC%2BD38%2FkvVyisg%3D%3D&md5=053fe74004781e26402f3d04534f99d6CAS |

[11]  Falagas ME, Rosmarakis ES, Rellos K, Michalopoulos A, Samonis G, Prapas SN. Microbiologically documented nosocomial infections after coronary artery bypass surgery without cardiopulmonary bypass. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2006; 132 481–90.
Microbiologically documented nosocomial infections after coronary artery bypass surgery without cardiopulmonary bypass.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[12]  Avato JI, Lai KK. Impact of post discharge surveillance on surgical-site infection rates for coronary artery bypass procedures. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2002; 23 364–7.
Impact of post discharge surveillance on surgical-site infection rates for coronary artery bypass procedures.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[13]  Bouza E, Hortal J, Munoz P, Pérez MJ, Riesgo MJ, Hiesmayr M. Infections following major heart surgery in European intensive care units: there is room for improvement (ESGNI 007 Study). J Hosp Infect 2006; 63 399–405.
Infections following major heart surgery in European intensive care units: there is room for improvement (ESGNI 007 Study).Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:STN:280:DC%2BD28vit1agsQ%3D%3D&md5=fe520992479e5e64e9c5a639b31c5027CAS |

[14]  Olsen MA, Lock-Buckley P, Hopkins D, Polish LB, Sundt TM, Fraser VJ. The risk factors for deep and superficial chest surgical-site infections after coronary artery bypass graft surgery are different. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2002; 124 136–45.
The risk factors for deep and superficial chest surgical-site infections after coronary artery bypass graft surgery are different.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[15]  Dohmen PM, Gabbieri D, Weymann A, Linneweber J, Konertz W. Reduction in surgical site infection in patients treated with microbial sealant prior to coronary artery bypass graft surgery: a case-control study. J Hosp Infect 2009; 72 119–26.
Reduction in surgical site infection in patients treated with microbial sealant prior to coronary artery bypass graft surgery: a case-control study.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:STN:280:DC%2BD1MzhsFektA%3D%3D&md5=10c6ecfc0b3ab695b724042bd873efd7CAS |

[16]  Michalopoulos A, Geroulanos S, Rosmarakis ES, Falagas ME. Frequency, characteristics, and predictors of microbiologically documented nosocomial infections after cardiac surgery. European J Cardio-Thoracic Surgery 2006; 29 456–460.
Frequency, characteristics, and predictors of microbiologically documented nosocomial infections after cardiac surgery.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[17]  Mangram AJ, Horan TC, Pearson ML, Silver LC, Jarvis WR. Guideline for prevention of surgical site infection, 1999. Center for disease control and prevention (CDC), Healthcare infection control practices advisory committee (HICPAC). Am J Infect Control 1999; 27 97–134.
Guideline for prevention of surgical site infection, 1999. Center for disease control and prevention (CDC), Healthcare infection control practices advisory committee (HICPAC).Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:STN:280:DyaK1M3htl2htg%3D%3D&md5=b9fdaefc9a71e555359562253aaa8073CAS |

[18]  Berg TC, Kjørstad KE, Akselsen PE, et al National surveillance of surgical site infections after coronary artery bypass grafting in Norway: incidence and risk factors. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2011;
National surveillance of surgical site infections after coronary artery bypass grafting in Norway: incidence and risk factors.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[19]  Centofanti P, Savia F, La Torre M, et al A prospective study of prevalence of 60-days postoperative wound infections after cardiac surgery. An updated risk factor analysis. J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino) 2007; 48 641–6.
| 1:STN:280:DC%2BD2snmsVOlug%3D%3D&md5=2539077f162e16746beb8541653f7c70CAS |

[20]  Marković-Denić L, Rakić V, Maksimović M, Djokić M. Incidence of surgical site infections in a urology department. Acta Chir Iugosl 2011; 58 61–5.
Incidence of surgical site infections in a urology department.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[21]  Manniën J, Wille JC, Kloek JJ, van Benthem BH. Surveillance and epidemiology of surgical site infections after cardiothoracic surgery in The Netherlands, 2002–2007. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2011; 141 899–904.

[22]  Tartari E, Mamo J. Pre-educational intervention survey of healthcare practitioners’ compliance with infection prevention measures in cardiothoracic surgery: low compliance but internationally comparable surgical site infection rate. J Hosp Infect 2011; 77 348–51.
Pre-educational intervention survey of healthcare practitioners’ compliance with infection prevention measures in cardiothoracic surgery: low compliance but internationally comparable surgical site infection rate.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:STN:280:DC%2BC3M3ot1ylsg%3D%3D&md5=18623dea7b9beab8c4dd07d7f983ef82CAS |

[23]  NRZ http://www.nrz-hygiene.de/surveillance/kiss/op-kiss Epidemiological data from KISS.

[24]  Beckmann A, Doebler K, Schaefer E, Koetting J, Gastmeier P, Graf K.. Sternal surgical site infection prevention – is there any room for improvement? Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2011; 40 347–51.
Sternal surgical site infection prevention – is there any room for improvement?Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[25]  Jonkers D, Elenbaas T, Terporten P, Nieman F, Stobberingh E. Prevalence of 90-days postoperative wound infections after cardiac surgery. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2003; 23 97–102.
Prevalence of 90-days postoperative wound infections after cardiac surgery.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |