Register      Login
Health Promotion Journal of Australia Health Promotion Journal of Australia Society
Journal of the Australian Health Promotion Association
RESEARCH ARTICLE

Sitting ducks face chronic disease: an analysis of newspaper coverage of sedentary behaviour as a health issue in Australia 2000–2012

Josephine Y. Chau A E , Catriona Bonfiglioli B , Amy Zhong A , Zeljko Pedisic A C , Michelle Daley D , Bronwyn McGill A and Adrian Bauman A
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations

A Prevention Research Collaboration, School of Public Health, Sydney Medical School, Level 6, The Hub, Charles Perkins Centre, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia.

B Faculty of Arts and Social Sciences, University of Technology Sydney, City Campus, 15 Broadway, Ultimo, NSW 2007, Australia.

C Institute of Sport, Exercise and Active Living, Victoria University, Footscray Park Campus, Ballarat Road, Footscray, Vic. 3001, Australia.

D National Heart Foundation of Australia, New South Wales Division, Level 3, 80 William Street, Sydney, NSW 2011, Australia.

E Corresponding author. Email: josephine.chau@sydney.edu.au

Health Promotion Journal of Australia 28(2) 139-143 https://doi.org/10.1071/HE16054
Submitted: 11 May 2016  Accepted: 3 November 2016   Published: 12 January 2017

Abstract

Issue addressed: This study examines how sedentary behaviour (too much sitting) was covered as a health issue by Australian newspapers and how physical activity was framed within this newspaper coverage.

Methods: Articles featuring sedentary behaviour published in Australian newspapers between 2000 and 2012 were analysed for content and framing. Main outcome measures were volume, number and content of newspaper articles; framing and types of sedentary behaviour; responsibility for the problem of and solutions to high levels of sedentary behaviour; and physical activity mentions and how it was framed within sedentary behaviour coverage.

Results: Out of 48 articles, prolonged sitting was framed as bad for health (52%) and specifically as health compromising for office workers (25%). Adults who sat a lot were framed as ‘easy targets’ for ill health (21% of headlines led with ‘sitting ducks’ or ‘sitting targets’). Prolonged sitting was framed as an issue of individual responsibility (>90%) with less mention of environmental and sociocultural contributors. Thirty-six of 48 articles mentioned physical activity; 39% stated that being physically active does not matter if a person sits for prolonged periods of time or that the benefits of physical activity are undone by too much sitting.

Conclusions: News coverage should reflect the full socio-ecological model of sedentary behaviour and continually reinforce the independent and well-established benefits of health-enhancing physical activity alongside the need to limit prolonged sitting.

So what?: It is important that the entire ‘move more, sit less, every day!’ message is communicated by news media.

Key words: health communication, mass media, physical activity.


References

[1]  Bauman AE, Chau JY, Ding D, Bennie J (2013) Too much sitting and cardio-metabolic risk: an update of epidemiological evidence. Curr Cardiovasc Risk Rep 7, 293–8.
Too much sitting and cardio-metabolic risk: an update of epidemiological evidence.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[2]  Wilmot EG, Edwardson CL, Achana FA, Davies MJ, Gorely T, Gray LJ, et al (2012) Sedentary time in adults and the association with diabetes, cardiovascular disease and death: systematic review and meta-analysis. Diabetologia 55, 2895–905.
Sedentary time in adults and the association with diabetes, cardiovascular disease and death: systematic review and meta-analysis.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:STN:280:DC%2BC38fnvVarsg%3D%3D&md5=b4cc4ba223e4faf4b88eedfd945f94b3CAS |

[3]  Chau JY, Grunseit AC, Chey T, Stamatakis E, Brown WJ, Matthew CE, et al (2013) Daily sitting time and all-cause mortality: a meta-analysis. PLoS One 8, e80000
Daily sitting time and all-cause mortality: a meta-analysis.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[4]  Ekelund U, Steene-Johannessen J, Brown WJ, Fagerland MW, Owen N, Powell KE, et al (2016) Does physical activity attenuate, or even eliminate, the detrimental association of sitting time with mortality? A harmonised meta-analysis of data from more than 1 million men and women. Lancet 388, 24–30.
Does physical activity attenuate, or even eliminate, the detrimental association of sitting time with mortality? A harmonised meta-analysis of data from more than 1 million men and women.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[5]  Australian Government Department of Health. Australia’s physical activity and sedentary behaviour guidelines. 2014. Available from: http://www.health.gov.au/internet/main/publishing.nsf/content/health-pubhlth-strateg-phys-act-guidelines #apaadult [Verified 13 December 2016].

[6]  Garber CE, Blissmer B, Deschenes MR, Franklin BA, Lamonte MJ, Lee IM, et al (2011) American College of Sports Medicine position stand. Quantity and quality of exercise for developing and maintaining cardiorespiratory, musculoskeletal, and neuromotor fitness in apparently healthy adults: guidance for prescribing exercise. Med Sci Sports Exerc 43, 1334–59.
American College of Sports Medicine position stand. Quantity and quality of exercise for developing and maintaining cardiorespiratory, musculoskeletal, and neuromotor fitness in apparently healthy adults: guidance for prescribing exercise.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[7]  Owen N, Salmon J, Koohsari MJ, Turrell G, Giles-Corti B (2014) Sedentary behaviour and health: mapping environmental and social contexts to underpin chronic disease prevention. Br J Sports Med 48, 174–7.
Sedentary behaviour and health: mapping environmental and social contexts to underpin chronic disease prevention.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[8]  Matthews CE, Chen KY, Freedson PS, Buchowski MS, Beech BM, Pate RR, et al (2008) Amount of time spent in sedentary behaviors in the United States, 2003–2004. Am J Epidemiol 167, 875–81.
Amount of time spent in sedentary behaviors in the United States, 2003–2004.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[9]  Finlay S-J, Faulkner G (2005) Physical activity promotion through the mass media: inception, production, transmission and consumption. Prev Med 40, 121–30.
Physical activity promotion through the mass media: inception, production, transmission and consumption.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[10]  Nagler RH (2014) Adverse outcomes associated with media exposure to contradictory nutrition messages. J Health Commun 19, 24–40.
Adverse outcomes associated with media exposure to contradictory nutrition messages.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[11]  MacKenzie R, Freeman B (2010) Second-hand smoke in cars: how did the “23 times more toxic” myth turn into fact? Can Med Assoc J 182, 796–9.
Second-hand smoke in cars: how did the “23 times more toxic” myth turn into fact?Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[12]  Sedentary Behaviour Research Network (2012) Standardized use of the terms “sedentary” and “sedentary behaviours”. Appl Physiol Nutr Metab 37, 540–2.
Standardized use of the terms “sedentary” and “sedentary behaviours”.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[13]  Bonfiglioli CMF, Smith BJ, King LA, Chapman SF, Holding SJ, Medical T (2007) Choice and voice: obesity debates in television news. Med J Aust 187, 442–5.

[14]  Bonfiglioli C, Hattersley L, King L (2011) Australian print news media coverage of sweet, non-alcoholic drinks sends mixed health messages. Aust NZ J Publ Heal 35, 325–30.
Australian print news media coverage of sweet, non-alcoholic drinks sends mixed health messages.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[15]  Bonfiglioli C, Smith BJ, King L, Chapman S (2011) Risky exercise – is physical activity losing the news race? Aust Journalism Rev 33, 73–84.

[16]  Lawrence RG (2004) Framing obesity: the evolution of news discourse on a public health issue. Int J Press-Polit 9, 56–75.

[17]  Chau JY, Merom D, Grunseit A, Rissel C, Bauman AE, van der Ploeg HP (2012) Temporal trends in non-occupational sedentary behaviours from Australian Time Use Surveys 1992, 1997 and 2006. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act 9, 76
Temporal trends in non-occupational sedentary behaviours from Australian Time Use Surveys 1992, 1997 and 2006.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[18]  Sallis JF, Cervero RB, Ascher W, Henderson KA, Kraft MK, Kerr J (2006) An ecological approach to creating active living communities. Annu Rev Public Health 27, 297–322.
An ecological approach to creating active living communities.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[19]  van der Ploeg HP, Chey T, Korda RJ, Banks E, Bauman AE (2012) Sitting time and all-cause mortality risk in 222,497 Australian adults. Arch Intern Med 172, 494–500.
Sitting time and all-cause mortality risk in 222,497 Australian adults.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[20]  Linton-Evans C (2015) Is sitting the new smoking? Sydney Morning Herald 12 September 2015.

[21]  Laranjo L, Arguel A, Neves AL, Gallagher AM, Kaplan R, Mortimer N, et al (2015) The influence of social networking sites on health behavior change: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Am Med Inform Assoc 22, 243–56.