Operating from different premises: the ethics of inter-disciplinarity in health promotion
Alan CribbCentre for Public Policy Research, King’s College London, Waterloo Road, London SE1 9NH, UK. Email: alan.cribb@kcl.ac.uk
Health Promotion Journal of Australia 26(3) 200-204 https://doi.org/10.1071/HE15060
Submitted: 9 June 2015 Accepted: 16 October 2015 Published: 10 December 2015
Abstract
The intersectoral and interdisciplinary nature of health promotion gives rise to ethical questions. This is because health promotion depends upon alliances between people who often have different perspectives on what matters in particular cases or different visions of the good society. This paper draws on the ambivalent relationship that health promoters can have with biomedicine to illustrate and explore the nature of these ethical questions. Examples from everyday life are used to underline the familiar nature of the kinds of coalitions and compromises that are needed to work alongside others with different values to oneself. It is suggested that analogous kinds of compromise are needed in health promotion and that this requires a form of ‘diplomatic ethics’ for health promoters that, in turn, raises questions about their ethical integrity.
References
[1] Haimes E (2002) What can social science contribute to the study of ethics? Theoretical, empirical and substantive considerations. Bioethics 16, 89–113.| What can social science contribute to the study of ethics? Theoretical, empirical and substantive considerations.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 12083157PubMed |
[2] Cribb A, Wainwright S, Williams C, Farsides B, Michael M (2008) Towards the applied: the construction of ethical positions in stem cell translational research. Med Health Care Philos 11, 351–61.
| Towards the applied: the construction of ethical positions in stem cell translational research.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 18075783PubMed |
[3] Applbaum AI. Ethics for adversaries: the morality of roles in public and professional life. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press; 1999.
[4] Sewell G (2005) Doing what comes naturally? Why we need a practical ethics of teamwork. Int J Hum Resour Manage 16, 202–18.
| Doing what comes naturally? Why we need a practical ethics of teamwork.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[5] Parrott L (2008) The ethics of partnership. Ethics Soc Welf 2, 24–37.
| The ethics of partnership.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[6] White K. Introduction to sociology of health and illness. London: Sage; 2009.
[7] Boyce T, Peckham S, Hann A, Trenholm S. A pro-active approach. Health promotion and ill-health prevention. London: King’s Fund; 2010.
[8] Green J, Tones K, Cross R, Woodall J. Health promotion: planning and strategies. London: Sage; 2015.
[9] Sen A. The idea of justice. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press; 2009.
[10] Nussbaum MC. Creating capabilities. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press; 2011.
[11] Delgado R, Stefancic J. Critical race theory: an introduction. New York: New York University Press; 2012.
[12] Fraser N. Fortunes of feminism: from state-managed capitalism to neoliberal crisis. London: Verso; 2013.
[13] Goldberg DS (2012) Social justice, health inequalities and methodological individualism in US health promotion. Public Health Ethics 5, 104–15.
| Social justice, health inequalities and methodological individualism in US health promotion.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[14] Lempp H, Cribb A. The unity and diversity of the hidden curriculum. In Hafferty FW, O’Donnell JF, editors. The hidden curriculum in health professional education (pp. 73–83). Lebanon, NH: Dartmouth College Press; 2014.
[15] Eldershaw L, Mayan M, Winkler A (2007) Through a painted window: on narrative, method and medicine. Interview with Arthur W. Frank. Int J Qual Methods 6, 121–39.
[16] Cribb A (2011) Integrity at work: managing routine moral stress in professional roles. Nurs Philos 12, 119–27.
| Integrity at work: managing routine moral stress in professional roles.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 21371249PubMed |