Navigating the ethics of cross-cultural health promotion research
Greer Lamaro Haintz A B , Melissa Graham A and Hayley McKenzie AA Centre for Health through Action on Social Exclusion, School of Health and Social Development, Deakin University, 221 Burwood Highway, Burwood, Vic. 3125, Australia.
B Corresponding author. Email: greer.lamaro@deakin.edu.au
Health Promotion Journal of Australia 26(3) 235-240 https://doi.org/10.1071/HE15050
Submitted: 30 May 2015 Accepted: 18 October 2015 Published: 17 November 2015
Abstract
Health promotion researchers must consider the ethics of their research, and are usually required to abide by a set of ethical requirements stipulated by governing bodies (such as the Australian National Health and Medical Research Council) and human research ethics committees (HRECs). These requirements address both deontological (rule-based) and consequence-based issues. However, at times there can be a disconnect between the requirements of deontological issues and the cultural sensitivity required when research is set in cultural contexts and settings etic to the HREC. This poses a challenge for health promotion researchers who must negotiate between meeting both the requirements of the HREC and the needs of the community with whom the research is being conducted. Drawing on two case studies, this paper discusses examples from cross-cultural health promotion research in Australian and international settings where disconnect arose and negotiation was required to appropriately meet the needs of all parties. The examples relate to issues of participant recruitment and informed consent, participants under the Australian legal age of consent, participant withdrawal when this seemingly occurs in an ad hoc rather than a formal manner and reciprocity. Although these approaches are context specific, they highlight issues for consideration to advance more culturally appropriate practice in research ethics and suggest ways a stronger anthropological lens can be applied to research ethics to overcome these challenges.
References
[1] Kemm JR. Health promotion: ideology, discipline and specialism. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2015.[2] Erinosho O. Ethics for public health research in Africa. Proceedings of an International Workshop in collaboration with the Special Programme for Research and Training in Tropical Diseases (TDR) of the World Health Organization, Abuja, 21–23 April 2008. Abuja: Social Science Academy of Nigeria; 2008. Available at http://r4d.dfid.gov.uk/PDF/Outputs/Misc_CommDis/ethics-public-health.pdf [Verified 27 October 2015].
[3] Mohindra KS, Narayan D, Haddad S (2011) Towards ethically sound participatory research with marginalised populations: experiences from India. Dev Pract 21, 1168–75.
| Towards ethically sound participatory research with marginalised populations: experiences from India.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[4] National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC), The Australian Research Council, The Australian Vice-Chancellors’ Committee. National statement on ethical conduct in human research 2007 (updated May 2015). Canberra: NHMRC, Commonwealth of Australia; 2007.
[5] Keleher H, MacDougal C, Murphy B, editors. Understanding health promotion. Melbourne: Oxford University Press; 2007.
[6] Guillemin M, Gillam L (2004) Ethics, reflexivity, and “ethically important moments” in research. Qual Inq 10, 261–80.
| Ethics, reflexivity, and “ethically important moments” in research.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[7] Carter SM, Cribb A, Allegrante JP (2012) How to think about health promotion ethics. Public Health Rev 34, Available from: http://www.publichealthreviews.eu/upload/pdf_files/11/00_Carter.pdf
[8] Masse R, William-Jones B. Ethical dilemmas in health promotion practice. In Rootman I, Dupere S, Pederson A, O’Neill M, editors. Health promotion in Canada, 3rd edn (pp. 241–253). Toronto: Canadian Scholars’ Press; 2012.
[9] Yassi A, Breilh J, Dharamsi S, Lockhart K, Spiegel J (2013) The ethics of ethics reviews in global health research: case studies applying a new paradigm. J Acad Ethics 11, 83–101.
| The ethics of ethics reviews in global health research: case studies applying a new paradigm.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[10] Benatar SR, Singer PA (2000) A new look at international research ethics. BMJ 321, 824–6.
| A new look at international research ethics.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:STN:280:DC%2BD3M%2FhvFamtA%3D%3D&md5=f84119e0f7b9b04aac641a4ac05f66c1CAS | 11009528PubMed |
[11] Tannahill A (2008) Beyond evidence – to ethics: a decision making framework for health promotion, public health and health improvement. Health Promot Int 23, 380–90.
| Beyond evidence – to ethics: a decision making framework for health promotion, public health and health improvement.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 18971394PubMed |
[12] Glass KC, Kaufert J (2007) Research ethics review and Aboriginal community values: can the two be reconciled? J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics 2, 25–40.
| Research ethics review and Aboriginal community values: can the two be reconciled?Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 19385793PubMed |
[13] Jamieson LM, Paradies YC, Eades S, Chong A, Maple-Brown L, Morris P, et al (2012) Ten principles relevant to health research among Indigenous Australian populations. Med J Aust 197, 16–18.
| Ten principles relevant to health research among Indigenous Australian populations.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 22762218PubMed |
[14] Bailey J, Veitch C, Crossland L, Preston R (2006) Developing research capacity building for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander health workers in health service settings. Rural Remote Health 6, 556
[15] Harvey PW (2009) Science, research and social change in Indigenous Health: evolving ways of knowing. Aust Health Rev 33, 628–35.
| Science, research and social change in Indigenous Health: evolving ways of knowing.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 20166912PubMed |
[16] National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC). Values and ethics: guidelines for ethical conduct in Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander health research. Canberra: NHMRC; 2003.
[17] National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC). Keeping research on track: a guide for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples about health research ethics. Canberra: NHMRC; 2005.
[18] Lairumbi GM, Parker M, Fitzpatrick R, English MC (2011) Ethics in practice: the state of the debate on promoting the social value of global health research in resource poor settings particularly Africa. BMC Med Ethics 12, 22
[19] Ijsselmuiden CB, Kass NE, Sewankambo KN, Lavery JV (2010) Evolving values in ethics and global health research. Glob Public Health 5, 154–63.
| Evolving values in ethics and global health research.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:STN:280:DC%2BC3c7mslKitQ%3D%3D&md5=f80039b98f0c052520fa9b422e9aa029CAS | 20213565PubMed |
[20] Liamputtong P. Performing qualitative cross-cultural research. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2010.
[21] Ramcharan P. What is ethical research? In Liamputtong P, editor. Research methods in health: foundations for evidence-based practice, 2nd edn (pp. 24–36). Melbourne: Oxford University Press; 2013.
[22] Block K, Warr D, Gibbs L, Riggs E (2012) Addressing ethical and methodological challenges in research with refugee-background young people: reflections from the field. J Refug Stud 26, 69–87.
[23] Ramcharan P (2006) Ethical challenges and complexities of including vulnerable people in research: some pre-theoretical considerations. J Intellect Dev Disabil 31, 183–5.
| Ethical challenges and complexities of including vulnerable people in research: some pre-theoretical considerations.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[24] Menih H (2010) Applying ethical principles in researching a vulnerable population: homeless women in Brisbane. Curr Issues Crim Justice 25, 527–39.
[25] Van Wijk E (2014) Recruitment and retention of vulnerable populations: lessons learned from a longitudinal qualitative study. Qual Rep 19, 1–21.
[26] Clark T (2008) ‘We’re over-researched here!’: exploring accounts of research fatigue within qualitative research engagements. Sociology 42, 953–70.
| ‘We’re over-researched here!’: exploring accounts of research fatigue within qualitative research engagements.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[27] Koen J. The ‘over-researched’ community: an exploration of stakeholder perceptions and ethical analysis. MA Thesis, The University of KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa, 2010.
[28] Lairumbi GM, Parker M, Fitzpatrick R, English MC (2012) Forms of benefit sharing in global health research undertaken in resource poor settings: a qualitative study of stakeholders’ views in Kenya. Philos Ethics Humanit Med 7, 7
| Forms of benefit sharing in global health research undertaken in resource poor settings: a qualitative study of stakeholders’ views in Kenya.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 22251457PubMed |
[29] Edwards N, Viehbeck S, Hamalainen RM (2012) Challenges of ethical clearance in international health policy and social science research: experiences and recommendations from a multi-country research program. Public Health Rev 34, Available from: http://www.publichealthreviews.eu/upload/pdf_files/11/00_Edwards.pdf [Verified 5 November 2015].