‘Troubling’ moments in health promotion: unpacking the ethics of empowerment
Grace SpencerFaculty of Health Sciences, University of Sydney, East Street, Lidcombe, NSW 2141, Australia. Email: grace.spencer@sydney.edu.au
Health Promotion Journal of Australia 26(3) 205-209 https://doi.org/10.1071/HE15049
Submitted: 30 May 2015 Accepted: 18 September 2015 Published: 5 November 2015
Abstract
Issue addressed: Concepts of empowerment feature strongly in global health discourses. Empowerment is frequently advocated as a positive approach to addressing individual and community-level health needs. Despite its popularity, relatively little has been said about the unintended consequences of empowerment, which may give rise to some troubling ethical issues or, indeed, result in outcomes that may not be considered health promoting.
Methods: Drawing on current uses of empowerment within health promotion, along with insights from an ethnographic study on young people’s health, this paper raises some critical questions about the ethics of empowerment. By doing so, the paper troubles the idea that empowerment is a ‘good thing’ without some careful attention to the varying ways in which the ethics of empowerment may unfold in practice.
Results: Findings revealed young people’s different perspectives on health and priorities for health promotion. The present analysis highlights how these alternative framings prompt a number of ethical tensions for understanding and operationalising empowerment.
Conclusions: In conclusion, the findings underscore the importance of promoting ethical reflexivity in health promotion and, crucially, attending to the unintended and potentially ethically problematic consequences of empowerment.
So what?: This paper raises some critical questions about the ethics of empowerment and calls for a more thorough engagement with the unintended consequences of empowerment within health promotion.
Key words: health practices, young people.
References
[1] Wiggins N (2012) Popular education for health promotion and community empowerment: a review of the literature. Health Promot Int 27, 356–71.| Popular education for health promotion and community empowerment: a review of the literature.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 21835843PubMed |
[2] World Health Organization (WHO). Ottawa charter for health promotion. Geneva: WHO Regional Office for Europe; 1986.
[3] Wallerstein N. What is the evidence for the effectiveness of empowerment to improve health? Copenhagen: World Health Organization Regional Office for Europe; 2006.
[4] Laverack G. Public health: power, empowerment and professional practice. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan; 2009.
[5] Grace VM (1991) The marketing of empowerment and the construction of the health consumer: a critique of health promotion. Int J Health Serv 21, 329–43.
| The marketing of empowerment and the construction of the health consumer: a critique of health promotion.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:STN:280:DyaK3MzgtF2nug%3D%3D&md5=39d66728b393f7f7d8c439ae105f82ccCAS | 2071310PubMed |
[6] Spencer G. Empowerment, health promotion and young people: a critical approach. Abingdon, UK: Routledge; 2013.
[7] Asimakopoulou K, Gilbert D, Newton P, Scambler S (2012) Back to basics: re-examining the role of patient empowerment in diabetes. Patient Educ Couns 86, 281–3.
| Back to basics: re-examining the role of patient empowerment in diabetes.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 21543183PubMed |
[8] Asimakopoulou K, Newton P, Sinclair AJ, Scambler S (2012) Health care professionals’ understanding and day-to-day practice of patient empowerment in diabetes; time to pause for thought? Diabetes Res Clin Pract 95, 224–9.
| Health care professionals’ understanding and day-to-day practice of patient empowerment in diabetes; time to pause for thought?Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:STN:280:DC%2BC387oslKgtQ%3D%3D&md5=8f263b44720cce2b5542c2b2cc6367c9CAS | 22036297PubMed |
[9] Newton P, Asimakopoulou K, Scambler S (2012) Information seeking and use amongst people living with type 2 diabetes: an information continuum. Int J Health Promot Educ 50, 92–9.
| Information seeking and use amongst people living with type 2 diabetes: an information continuum.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[10] Seedhouse D (2001) Health promotion’s ethical challenge. Health Promot J Austr 11, 135–8.
[11] Sindall C (2002) Does health promotion need a code of ethics? Health Promot Int 17, 201–3.
| Does health promotion need a code of ethics?Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 12147634PubMed |
[12] Owens J, Cribb A (2013) Beyond choice and individualism: understanding autonomy for public health ethics. Public Health Ethics 6, 262–71.
| Beyond choice and individualism: understanding autonomy for public health ethics.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[13] Carter SM (2014) Health promotion: an ethical analysis. Health Promot J Austr 25, 19–24.
| Health promotion: an ethical analysis.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 24739775PubMed |
[14] Callahan D, Jennings B (2002) Ethics and public health: forging a strong relationship. Am J Public Health 92, 169–76.
| Ethics and public health: forging a strong relationship.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 11818284PubMed |
[15] Beauchamp T, Childress J. Principles in biomedical ethics. New York: Oxford University Press; 2013.
[16] Williamson L (2014) Patient and citizen participation in health: the need for improved ethical support. Am J Bioeth 14, 4–16.
| Patient and citizen participation in health: the need for improved ethical support.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 24809598PubMed |
[17] Tengland P-A (2012) Behaviour change or empowerment: on the ethics of health promotion strategies. Public Health Ethics 5, 140–53.
| Behaviour change or empowerment: on the ethics of health promotion strategies.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[18] Rissel C (1994) Empowerment: the holy grail of health promotion? Health Promot Int 9, 39–47.
| Empowerment: the holy grail of health promotion?Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[19] Freire P. Pedagogy of the oppressed. London: Penguin Books; 1996.
[20] Mantoura P, Potvin L (2013) A realist-constructive perspective on participatory research in health promotion. Health Promot Int 28, 61–72.
| A realist-constructive perspective on participatory research in health promotion.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 22952337PubMed |
[21] Lupton D, Tulloch J (2002) Life would be pretty dull without risk: voluntary risk-taking and its pleasures. Health Risk Soc 4, 113–24.
| Life would be pretty dull without risk: voluntary risk-taking and its pleasures.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[22] Katainen A (2006) Challenging the imperative of health? Smoking and justifications of risk-taking. Crit Public Health 16, 295–305.
| Challenging the imperative of health? Smoking and justifications of risk-taking.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[23] Spencer G. (2013) Young people’s perspectives on health: empowerment, or risk? Health Educ 113, 115–31.
[24] Spencer G .
[25] Harrison L, Kelly P, Lindsay J, Advocat J, Hickey C (2011) ‘I don’t know anyone that has two drinks a day’: young people’s, alcohol and the government of pleasure. Health Risk Soc 13, 469–86.
| ‘I don’t know anyone that has two drinks a day’: young people’s, alcohol and the government of pleasure.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[26] Grbich C. Qualitative data analysis: an introduction. London: Sage; 2012.
[27] Percy-Smith B (2006) From consultation to social learning in community participation with young people. Child Youth Environ 16, 153–78.
[28] Percy-Smith B (2007) ‘You think you know? You have no idea’: youth participation in health policy development. Health Educ Res 22, 879–94.
| ‘You think you know? You have no idea’: youth participation in health policy development.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 17652346PubMed |