Standardising the ‘after-school’ period for children’s physical activity and sedentary behaviour
Lauren Arundell A B , Jo Salmon A , Jenny Veitch A , Eoin O’Connell A , Trina Hinkley A and Clare Hume AA Centre for Physical Activity and Nutrition Research, School of Exercise and Nutrition Sciences, Deakin University, 221 Burwood Highway, Burwood, Vic. 3125, Australia.
B Corresponding author. Email: lauren.arundell@deakin.edu.au
Health Promotion Journal of Australia 24(1) 65-67 https://doi.org/10.1071/HE12910
Submitted: 27 July 2012 Accepted: 11 January 2013 Published: 21 March 2013
Abstract
Issue addressed: Studies examining children’s after-school physical activity (PA) and sedentary behaviours (SB) often use arbitrary times to signify the period start and end. A standardised time is required for future research examining this period. The aim of the present study was to compare children’s after-school behaviour using three definitions of the after-school period, namely (1) end of school to 6 pm; (2) end of school to dinner time; and (3) end of school to sunset, to determine the extent of variability in PA and SB during the after-school period depending on the definition used.
Methods: Children (n = 308; aged 8 years) from the Melbourne Transform-Us! intervention wore an accelerometer and a subsample (n = 112) wore an activPAL inclinometer in 2010. The end of school bell time was obtained from the child’s school, parents completed a 2-day log reporting their child’s dinner time and sunset times were obtained from Geoscience Australia. ActiGraph accelerometers assessed the proportion of time spent sedentary (SED) and that spent in light (LPA), moderate (MPA) and moderate-to-vigorous (MVPA) PA during the three time periods; activPAL inclinometers assessed the proportion of time spent sitting (SIT).
Results: Apart from the end of school time (3:30 pm), dinner (range 3:30 pm–8:40 pm) and sunset (range 5:07 pm–7:34 pm) times varied. Despite this, there were no significant differences in estimates of the proportions of time children spent in SED, LPA, MPA, MVPA or SIT between the three after-school periods examined.
Conclusion: Given the small differences in SED, PA and SIT during the after-school period regardless of the definition (6 pm, sunset or dinner time), it appears that applying a standardised definition of end of school to 6 pm is acceptable for defining children’s PA and SB during the after-school period.
So what?: The use of a standardised after-school definition (end of school to 6 pm), will enable future studies exploring children’s after-school PA and SB to be more comparable.
Key words: physical activity, sedentary behaviour, children, measurement development.
References
[1] Fairclough SJ, Butcher ZH, Stratton G (2007) Whole-day and segmented-day physical activity variability of northwest England school children. Prev Med 44, 421–5.| Whole-day and segmented-day physical activity variability of northwest England school children.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 17320158PubMed |
[2] Australian Bureau of Statistics. Children’s participation in cultural and leisure activities. Canberra: Commonwealth of Australia; 2004.
[3] Loucaides CA, Jago R, Charalambous I (2009) Promoting physical activity during school break times: piloting a simple, low cost intervention. Prev Med 48, 332–4.
| Promoting physical activity during school break times: piloting a simple, low cost intervention.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 19463481PubMed |
[4] Dengel DR, Hearst MO, Harmon JH, Forsyth A, Lytle LA (2009) Does the built environment relate to the metabolic syndrome in adolescents? Health Place 15, 946–51.
| Does the built environment relate to the metabolic syndrome in adolescents?Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 19406682PubMed |
[5] Dzewaltowski DA, Ryan GJ, Rosenkranz RR (2008) Parental bonding may moderate the relationship between parent physical activity and youth physical activity after school. Psychol Sport Exerc 9, 848–54.
| Parental bonding may moderate the relationship between parent physical activity and youth physical activity after school.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[6] Cooper AR, Page A, Wheeler B, Hillsdon M, Griew P, Jago R (2010) Patterns of GPS measured time outdoors after school and objective physical activity in English children: the PEACH project. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act 7, 31–9.
| Patterns of GPS measured time outdoors after school and objective physical activity in English children: the PEACH project.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 20412582PubMed |
[7] Hesketh K, Graham M, Waters E (2008) Children’s after-school activity: associations with weight status and family circumstance. Pediatr Exerc Sci 20, 84–94.
[8] Rushovich BR, Voorhees CC, Davis CE, Neumark-Sztainer D Rushovich BR, Voorhees CC, Davis CE, Neumark-Sztainer D (2006) The relationship between unsupervised time after school and physical activity in adolescent girls. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act 3, 20–8.
| The relationship between unsupervised time after school and physical activity in adolescent girls.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 16879750PubMed |
[9] Welk GJ, Corbin CB, Dale D (2000) Measurement issues in the assessment of physical activity in children. Res Q Exerc Sport 71, S59–73.
[10] Trost SG, Ward D, Moorehead S, Watson P, Riner PW, Burke J (1998) Validity of the computer science and applications (CSA) activity monitor in children. Med Sci Sports Exerc 30, 629–33.
| Validity of the computer science and applications (CSA) activity monitor in children.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:STN:280:DyaK1c3islSluw%3D%3D&md5=2aae12738928b208e5fff32dd639a7b6CAS | 9565947PubMed |
[11] Bailey RC, Olson J, Pepper SL, Porszasz J, Barstow TJ, Cooper DM (1995) The level and tempo of children’s physical activities: an observational study. Med Sci Sports Exerc 27, 1033–41.
| The level and tempo of children’s physical activities: an observational study.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:STN:280:DyaK28%2Fjsl2nug%3D%3D&md5=1d3638f66080f7a3c0f88b1a63e36d5eCAS | 7564970PubMed |
[12] Brockman R, Jago R, Fox KR (2010) The contribution of active play to the physical activity of primary school children. Prev Med 51, 144–7.
| The contribution of active play to the physical activity of primary school children.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 20561971PubMed |
[13] Ryan CG, Gray H, Newton M, Granat MH (2008) The convergent validity of free-living physical activity monitoring as an outcome measure of functional ability in people with chronic low back pain. J Back Musculoskelet Rehabil 21, 137–42.
[14] Grant PM, Ryan CG, Tigbe WW, Granat MH (2006) The validation of a novel activity monitor in the measurement of posture and motion during everyday activities. Br J Sports Med 40, 992–7.
| The validation of a novel activity monitor in the measurement of posture and motion during everyday activities.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:STN:280:DC%2BD28nosFGnsQ%3D%3D&md5=ad5c5ba845f46216c688692bed97c919CAS | 16980531PubMed |
[15] Davies G, Reilly JJ, McGowan AJ, Dall PM, Granat MH, Paton JY (2012) Validity, practical utility, and reliability of the activPAL(TM) in preschool children. Med Sci Sports Exerc 44, 761–8.
| Validity, practical utility, and reliability of the activPAL(TM) in preschool children.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 21983077PubMed |
[16] Trost SG, Pate RR, Sallis JF, Freedson P, Taylor W, Dowda M, Sirard J (2002) Age and gender differences in objectively measured physical activity in youth. Med Sci Sports Exerc 34, 350–5.
| Age and gender differences in objectively measured physical activity in youth.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 11828247PubMed |