Register      Login
Functional Plant Biology Functional Plant Biology Society
Plant function and evolutionary biology
RESEARCH ARTICLE

Linking stem diameter variations to sap flow, turgor and water potential in tomato

Tom De Swaef A B and Kathy Steppe A
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations

A Faculty of Bioscience Engineering, Department of Applied Ecology and Environmental Biology,Laboratory of Plant Ecology, Ghent University, Coupure Links 653, B-9000 Ghent, Belgium.

B Corresponding author. Email: tom.deswaef@ugent.be

Functional Plant Biology 37(5) 429-438 https://doi.org/10.1071/FP09233
Submitted: 16 September 2009  Accepted: 15 January 2010   Published: 30 April 2010

Abstract

Water status plays an important role for fruit quality and quantity in tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.). However, determination of the plant water status via measurements of sap flow (FH2O) or stem diameter (D) cannot be done unambiguously since these variables are influenced by other effectors than the water status. We performed a semi-seasonal and a diurnal analysis of the simultaneous response of FH2O and D to environmental conditions, which allowed us to distinguish different influences on ΔD such as plant age, fruit load and water status and to reveal close diurnal relationships between FH2O and ΔD. In addition, an analysis of the diurnal mechanistic link between both variables was done by applying a slightly modified version of a water flow and storage model for trees. Tomato stems, in contrast with trees, seemed to maintain growth while transpiring because a large difference between turgor pressure (Ψp) and the yield threshold (Γ) was maintained. Finally, the simultaneous response of D and FH2O on irrigation events showed a possibility to detect water shortages.

Additional keywords: drought stress, early warning, ecophysiology, growth, horticulture, model, transpiration, water relations, water status.


Acknowledgements

The authors thank the Special Research Fund (B.O.F.) of Ghent University for the PhD funding granted to the first author. The authors are also indebted to Philip Deman and Geert Favyts for their technical support.


References


Begg JE, Turner NC (1970) Water potential gradients in field tobacco. Plant Physiology 46, 343–346.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | PubMed | open url image1

Büntemeyer K, Lüthen H, Böttger M (1998) Auxin-induced changes in cell wall extensibility of maize roots. Planta 204, 515–519.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Cosgrove DJ (1985) Cell wall yield properties of growing tissue – evaluation by in vivo stress relaxation. Plant Physiology 78, 347–356.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | PubMed | open url image1

Cosgrove DJ (1986) Biophysical control of plant cell growth. Annual Review of Plant Physiology and Plant Molecular Biology 37, 377–405.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Cosgrove DJ (1993) Wall extensibility – its nature, measurement and relationship to plant-cell growth. New Phytologist 124, 1–23.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | PubMed | open url image1

Cuartero J, Fernandez-Munoz R (1999) Tomato and salinity. Scientia Horticulturae 78, 83–125.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

De Pauw DJW, Steppe K, De Baets B (2008) Identifiability analysis and improvement of a tree water flow and storage model. Mathematical Biosciences 211, 314–332.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | PubMed | open url image1

De Swaef T, Steppe K, Lemeur R (2009) Determining reference values for stem water potential and maximum daily trunk shrinkage in young apple trees based on plant responses to water deficit. Agricultural Water Management 96, 541–550.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Dorais M, Papadopoulos AP, Gosselin A (2001) Greenhouse tomato fruit quality. Horticultural Reviews 26, 239–319. open url image1

Dorais M, Demers DA, Papadopoulos AP, Van Ieperen W (2004) Greenhouse tomato fruit cuticle cracking. Horticultural Reviews 30, 163–184. open url image1

Gallardo M, Thompson RB, Valdez LC, Fernandez MD (2006) Use of stem diameter variations to detect plant water stress in tomato. Irrigation Science 24, 241–255.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Génard M, Fishman S, Vercambre G, Huguet JG, Bussi C, Besset J, Habib R (2001) A biophysical analysis of stem and root diameter variations in woody plants. Plant Physiology 126, 188–202.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | PubMed | open url image1

Guichard S, Bertin N, Leonardi C, Gary C (2001) Tomato fruit quality in relation to water and carbon fluxes. Agronomie 21, 385–392.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Hammel HT (1968) Measurement of turgor pressure and its gradient in the phloem of oak. Plant Physiology 43, 1042–1048.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | PubMed | open url image1

Hunt ER, Running SW, Federer CA (1991) Extrapolating plant water flow resistances and capacitances to regional scales. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology 54, 169–195.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Intrigliolo DS, Castel JR (2006) Usefulness of diurnal trunk shrinkage as a water stress indicator in plum trees. Tree Physiology 26, 303–311.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | PubMed | open url image1

Intrigliolo DS, Castel JR (2007) Crop load affects maximum daily trunk shrinkage of plum trees. Tree Physiology 27, 89–96.
PubMed |
open url image1

Jones HG (1992) ‘Plants and microclimate, a quantitative approach to environmental plant physiology.’ (University Press: Cambridge)

Jones HG (2004) Irrigation scheduling: advantages and pitfalls of plant-based methods. Journal of Experimental Botany 55, 2427–2436.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | PubMed | open url image1

Léchaudel M, Vercambre G, Lescourret F, Normand F, Génard M (2007) An analysis of elastic and plastic fruit growth of mango in response to various assimilate supplies. Tree Physiology 27, 219–230.
PubMed |
open url image1

Li YL, Marcelis LFM, Stanghellini C (2004) Plant water relations as affected by osmotic potential of the nutrient solution and potential transpiration in tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.). The Journal of Horticultural Science & Biotechnology 79, 211–218. open url image1

Liu HF, Génard M, Guichard S, Bertin N (2007) Model-assisted analysis of tomato fruit growth in relation to carbon and water fluxes. Journal of Experimental Botany 58, 3567–3580.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | PubMed | open url image1

Lockhart JA (1965) An analysis of irreversible plant cell elongation. Journal of Theoretical Biology 8, 264–275.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | PubMed | open url image1

Mitchell JP, Shennan C, Grattan SR (1991) Developmental changes in tomato fruit composition in response to water deficit and salinity. Physiologia Plantarum 83, 177–185.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Nelder JA, Mead R (1965) A simplex method for function minimization. The Computer Journal 7, 308–313. open url image1

Nobel PS (1999) ‘Physicochemical and environmental plant physiology.’ (Academic Press: San Diego, CA)

Ortega JKE (1985) Augmented growth equation for cell wall expansion. Plant Physiology 79, 318–320.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | PubMed | open url image1

Peet MM, Willits DH (1995) Role of excess water in tomato fruit cracking. HortScience 30, 65–68. open url image1

Plaut Z, Grava A, Yehezkel C, Matan E (2004) How do salinity and water stress affect transport of water, assimilates and ions to tomato fruits? Physiologia Plantarum 122, 429–442.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Pritchard J (2007) Solute transport in the phloem. In ‘Plant solute transport’. (Eds AR Yeo, TJ Flowers) pp. 235–274. (Blackwell Publishing: Oxford, UK)

Proseus TE, Ortega JKE, Boyer JS (1999) Separating growth from elastic deformation during cell enlargement. Plant Physiology 119, 775–784.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | PubMed | open url image1

Steppe K, De Pauw DJW, Lemeur R (2008a) A step towards new irrigation scheduling strategies using plant-based measurements and mathematical modelling. Irrigation Science 26, 505–517.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Steppe K, De Pauw DJW, Lemeur R (2008b) Validation of a dynamic stem diameter variation model and the resulting seasonal changes in calibrated parameter values. Ecological Modelling 218, 247–259.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Steppe K, De Pauw DJW, Lemeur R, Vanrolleghem PA (2006) A mathematical model linking tree sap flow dynamics to daily stem diameter fluctuations and radial stem growth. Tree Physiology 26, 257–273.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | PubMed | open url image1

van Bavel MG , van Bavel CHM (1990) ‘Dynagage installation and operation manual.’ (Dynamax Inc.: Houston, TX)

Veit-Köhler U, Krumbein A, Kosegarten H (1999) Effect of different water supply on plant growth and fruit quality of Lycopersicon esculentum. Journal of Plant Nutrition and Soil Science 162, 583–588.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Vermeulen K, Steppe K, Janssen K, Bleyaert P, Dekock J, Aerts JM, Berckmans D, Lemeur R (2007) Solutions to overcome pitfalls of two automated systems for direct measurement of greenhouse tomato water uptake. HortTechnology 17, 220–226. open url image1

Vermeulen K, Steppe K, Linh NS, Lemeur R, De Backer L, Bleyaert P (2008) Simultaneous response of stem diameter, sap flow rate and leaf temperature of tomato plants to drought stress. Acta Horticulturae 801, 1259–1265. open url image1

Zweifel R , Item H , Hasler R (1999) Link between diurnal stem radius changes and tree water relations. In ‘Traveling workshop on canopy dynamics and forest management – a missing link’. pp. 869–877. (Heron Publishing: Victoria, BC)

Zweifel R, Steppe K, Sterck FJ (2007) Stomatal regulation by microclimate and tree water relations: interpreting ecophysiological field data with a hydraulic plant model. Journal of Experimental Botany 58, 2113–2131.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | PubMed | open url image1