Awn primordium to tipping is the most decisive developmental phase for spikelet survival in barley
Ahmad M. Alqudah A and Thorsten Schnurbusch A B
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations
A Research Group Plant Architecture, Genebank Department, Leibniz Institute of Plant Genetics and Crop Plant Research (IPK), Gatersleben 06466, Germany.
B Corresponding author. Email: thor@ipk-gatersleben.de
Functional Plant Biology 41(4) 424-436 https://doi.org/10.1071/FP13248
Submitted: 22 August 2013 Accepted: 7 October 2013 Published: 18 November 2013
Journal Compilation © CSIRO Publishing 2014 Open Access CC BY-NC-ND
Abstract
In small-grain cereals, grain yield is closely associated with grain number. Improved spikelet survival is an important trait for increasing grain yield. We investigated spikelet number, spikelet survival and yield-related traits under greenhouse conditions, and pot- and soil-grown field conditions. Thirty-two spring barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) accessions (14 two- and 18 six-rowed accessions) were manually dissected to determine spikelet/floret number on the main culm spike (SNS) at awn primordium (AP), tipping (TIP), heading and anther extrusion. We observed a significant difference between two- and six-rowed barley for SNS and spikelet survival at all stages and growing conditions. Both traits were highly genetically controlled, with repeatability and broad-sense heritability values of 0.74–0.93. The rate of spikelet survival from AP to harvest was higher in two- (~70%) than in six-rowed (~58%) barley. Spikelet abortion, starting immediately after AP, was negatively affected by increased SNS and the thermal time required to reach the AP stage. The largest proportion of spikelet reduction happened during the AP–TIP phase, which was the most critical period for spikelet survival. The duration between AP and the end of stem elongation correlated better with spikelet survival and yield-related characters than the estimated duration of stem elongation using leaf height measurements. Our observations indicate that the main spike plays an important role in single-plant grain yield. Extending the length of the critical AP–TIP phase is promising for improving yield through increased spikelet development and survival. The results also demonstrate that greenhouse conditions are appropriate for studying traits such as phase duration and spikelet survival in barley.
Additional keywords: Hordeum vulgare L., six-rowed, spikelet survival, stem elongation, two-rowed.
References
Appleyard M, Kirby JM, Fellowes G (1982) Relationship between duration of phases in the pre-anthesis life cycle of spring barley. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 33, 917–925.| Relationship between duration of phases in the pre-anthesis life cycle of spring barley.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Arisnabarreta S, Miralles DJ (2004) The influence of fertiliser nitrogen application on development and number of reproductive primordia in field-grown two- and six-rowed barleys. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 55, 357–366.
| The influence of fertiliser nitrogen application on development and number of reproductive primordia in field-grown two- and six-rowed barleys.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Arisnabarreta S, Miralles DJ (2006) Floret development and grain setting in near isogenic two- and six-rowed barley lines (Hordeum vulgare L.). Field Crops Research 96, 466–476.
| Floret development and grain setting in near isogenic two- and six-rowed barley lines (Hordeum vulgare L.).Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Bonnett OT (1966) Inflorescences of maize, wheat, rye, barley, and oats: their initiation and development. University of Illinois College of Agriculture, Agricultural Experiment Station Bulletin 721, 59–77.
Borràs G, Romagosa I, van Eeuwijk F, Slafer GA (2009) Genetic variability in duration of pre-heading phases and relationships with leaf appearance and tillering dynamics in a barley population. Field Crops Research 113, 95–104.
| Genetic variability in duration of pre-heading phases and relationships with leaf appearance and tillering dynamics in a barley population.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Cottrell JE, Easton RH, Dale JE, Wadsworth AC, Adam JS, Child RD, Hoad GV (1985) A comparison of spike and spikelet survival in mainstem and tillers of barley. Annals of Applied Biology 106, 365–377.
| A comparison of spike and spikelet survival in mainstem and tillers of barley.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
del Moral LG, Miralles DJ, Slafer G (2002) Initiation and appearance of vegetative and reproductive structures throughout barley development. In ‘Barley science: recent advances from molecular biology to agronomy of yield and quality’. (Eds GA Slafer, JL Molina-Cano, R Savin, JL Araus and I Romagosa) pp. 243–267 (Food Product Press: New York)
Ellis RP, Kirby EJM (1980) A comparison of spring barley grown in England and in Scotland. 2. Yield and its components. The Journal of Agricultural Science 95, 111–115.
| A comparison of spring barley grown in England and in Scotland. 2. Yield and its components.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Fischer RA (2007) Understanding the physiological basis of yield potential in wheat. The Journal of Agricultural Science 145, 99–113.
| Understanding the physiological basis of yield potential in wheat.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Forster BP, Franckowiak JD, Lundqvist U, Lyon J, Pitkethly I, Thomas WT (2007) The barley phytomer. Annals of Botany 100, 725–733.
| The barley phytomer.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 17901062PubMed |
Frank AB, Bauer A, Black AL (1992) Effects of air-temperature and fertilizer nitrogen on spike development in spring barley. Crop Science 32, 793–797.
| Effects of air-temperature and fertilizer nitrogen on spike development in spring barley.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DyaK38XltFSktbc%3D&md5=aabea8fc4de8eb0c18e0c6d630d071d9CAS |
Food and Agriculture Organisation (FAO) (2012) Information on post-harvesting operations. Available online at: http://www.fao.org/inpho/inpho-post-harvest-compendium/cereals-grains/en/ [Verified 30 October 2013].
González FG, Slafer GA, Miralles DJ (2003) Floret development and spike growth as affected by photoperiod during stem elongation in wheat. Field Crops Research 81, 29–38.
| Floret development and spike growth as affected by photoperiod during stem elongation in wheat.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Hanif M, Langer RHM (1972) Vascular system of spikelet in wheat (Triticum aestivum). Annals of Botany 36, 721–727.
Kernich GC, Halloran GM, Flood RG (1995a) Variation in developmental patterns of wild barley H. spontaneum and cultivated barley. Euphytica 82, 105–115.
| Variation in developmental patterns of wild barley H. spontaneum and cultivated barley.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Kernich GC, Slafer GA, Halloran GM (1995b) Barley development as affected by rate of change of photoperiod. The Journal of Agricultural Science 124, 379–388.
| Barley development as affected by rate of change of photoperiod.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Kernich G, Halloran G, Flood R (1996) Constant and interchanged photoperiod effects on the rate of development in barley (Hordeum vulgare). Australian Journal of Plant Physiology 23, 489–496.
| Constant and interchanged photoperiod effects on the rate of development in barley (Hordeum vulgare).Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Kernich GC, Halloran GM, Flood RG (1997) Variation in duration of pre-anthesis phases of development in barley (Hordeum vulgare). Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 48, 59–66.
| Variation in duration of pre-anthesis phases of development in barley (Hordeum vulgare).Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Kirby EJM (1988) Analysis of leaf, stem and ear growth in wheat from terminal spikelet stage to anthesis. Field Crops Research 18, 127–140.
| Analysis of leaf, stem and ear growth in wheat from terminal spikelet stage to anthesis.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Kirby E, Appleyard M (1987) ‘Cereal development guide.’ (NAC Cereal Unit: Stoneleigh, UK)
Kirby EJM, Siddique KHM, Perry MW, Kaesehagen D, Stern WR (1989) Variation in spikelet initiation and ear development of old and modern Australian wheat varieties. Field Crops Research 20, 113–128.
| Variation in spikelet initiation and ear development of old and modern Australian wheat varieties.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Kiss T, Balla K, Veisz O, Karsai I (2011) Elaboration of a non-destructive methodology for establishing plant developmental patterns in cereals. Acta Agronomica Hungarica 59, 293–301.
| Elaboration of a non-destructive methodology for establishing plant developmental patterns in cereals.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Kitchen BM, Rasmusson DC (1983) Duration and inheritance of leaf initiation spike initiation and spike growth in barley. Crop Science 23, 939–943.
| Duration and inheritance of leaf initiation spike initiation and spike growth in barley.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Miralles DJ, Slafer GA (2007) Paper presented at international workshop on increasing wheat yield potential, CIMMYT, Obregon, Mexico, 20–24 March 2006. Sink limitations to yield in wheat: how could it be reduced? The Journal of Agricultural Science 145, 139–149.
| Paper presented at international workshop on increasing wheat yield potential, CIMMYT, Obregon, Mexico, 20–24 March 2006. Sink limitations to yield in wheat: how could it be reduced?Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Miralles DJ, Richards RA, Slafer GA (2000) Duration of the stem elongation period influences the number of fertile florets in wheat and barley. Australian Journal of Plant Physiology 27, 931–940.
Riggs TJ, Kirby EJM (1978) Developmental consequences of two-row and six-row ear type in spring barley. 1. Genetical analysis and comparison of mature plant characters. The Journal of Agricultural Science 91, 199–205.
| Developmental consequences of two-row and six-row ear type in spring barley. 1. Genetical analysis and comparison of mature plant characters.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Sanchez-Garcia M, Royo C, Aparicio N, Martin-Sanchez JA, Alvaro F (2013) Genetic improvement of bread wheat yield and associated traits in Spain during the 20th century. The Journal of Agricultural Science 151, 105–118.
| Genetic improvement of bread wheat yield and associated traits in Spain during the 20th century.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 23365469PubMed |
Slafer GA, Rawson HM (1994) Sensitivity of wheat phasic development to major environmental factors – a re-examination of some assumptions made by physiologists and modelers. Australian Journal of Plant Physiology 21, 393–426.
| Sensitivity of wheat phasic development to major environmental factors – a re-examination of some assumptions made by physiologists and modelers.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Sreenivasulu N, Schnurbusch T (2012) A genetic playground for enhancing grain number in cereals. Trends in Plant Science 17, 91–101.
| A genetic playground for enhancing grain number in cereals.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BC38XitFOmu7c%3D&md5=82f30d88c07870442ef9a71d0a9160c1CAS | 22197176PubMed |
Waddington SR, Cartwright PM, Wall PC (1983) A quantitative scale of spike initial and pistil development in barley and wheat. Annals of Botany 51, 119–130.
Whingwiri EE, Stern WR (1982) Floret survival in wheat – significance of the time of floret initiation relative to terminal spikelet formation. The Journal of Agricultural Science 98, 257–268.
| Floret survival in wheat – significance of the time of floret initiation relative to terminal spikelet formation.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Zadoks JC, Chang TT, Konzak CF (1974) A decimal code for the growth stages of cereals. Weed Research 14, 415–421.
| A decimal code for the growth stages of cereals.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
