Grapevine rootstock effects on scion biomass are not associated with large modifications of primary shoot growth under nonlimiting conditions in the first year of growth
Sarah Jane Cookson A B , Cyril Hevin A , Martine Donnart A and Nathalie Ollat A
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations
A INRA, ISVV, EGFV, UMR 1287, F-33140 Villenave d’Ornon, France.
B Corresponding author. Email: sarah.cookson@bordeaux.inra.fr
Functional Plant Biology 39(8) 650-660 https://doi.org/10.1071/FP12071
Submitted: 6 March 2012 Accepted: 13 June 2012 Published: 6 August 2012
Abstract
In grapevine (Vitis vinifera L.), rootstocks are known to alter scion development by modifying stem weight and yield. The aim of this work was to evaluate the contribution of primary growth to the rootstock effects on scion biomass. The shoot growth of Vitis vinifera cv. Cabernet Sauvignon N autografted and grafted onto Vitis riparia cv. Riparia Gloire de Montpellier and Vitis berlandieri × V. rupestris cv. 1103 Paulsen was studied in young plants grown in pots trained to one stem in two experiments. Stem elongation and phytomer emergence were studied from grafting until the end of the growth season. The elongation of the Cabernet Sauvignon N leaves, tendrils and internodes of each phytomer along the stem was fitted using sigmoid curves. The rootstocks studied slightly altered the growth dynamics of the leaves, internodes and tendrils of the scion. This is the first study to examine the effect of rootstocks on shoot growth dynamics in any species. The alterations in primary growth were small, suggesting that rootstocks may alter scion biomass principally by modifying secondary growth.
Additional keywords: Cabernet Sauvignon, duration of elongation, elongation rate, growth kinetics, growth variables, Vitis vinifera.
References
Bailey-Serres J, Voesenek L (2008) Flooding stress: acclimations and genetic diversity. Annual Review of Plant Biology 59, 313–339.| Flooding stress: acclimations and genetic diversity.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD1cXntFaqsLc%3D&md5=14faccbe8ec99fefa8500afcdbe173f1CAS |
Baucher M, El Jaziri M, Vandeputte O (2007) From primary to secondary growth: origin and development of the vascular system. Journal of Experimental Botany 58, 3485–3501.
| From primary to secondary growth: origin and development of the vascular system.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD2sXhsVWhurvE&md5=37cb8531b64eda3a53e390865a2ae342CAS |
Cookson SJ, Granier C (2006) A dynamic analysis of the shade-induced plasticity in Arabidopsis thaliana rosette leaf development reveals new components of the shade-adaptative response. Annals of Botany 97, 443–452.
| A dynamic analysis of the shade-induced plasticity in Arabidopsis thaliana rosette leaf development reveals new components of the shade-adaptative response.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
De Kroon H, Visser EJW, Huber H, Mommer L, Hutchings MJ (2009) A modular concept of plant foraging behaviour: the interplay between local responses and systemic control. Plant, Cell & Environment 32, 704–712.
| A modular concept of plant foraging behaviour: the interplay between local responses and systemic control.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD1MXmslemsLk%3D&md5=7a1a0bfa4af1639f7e61c56cf4c6d1a7CAS |
Fournioux J, Bessis R (1984) Physiologie de la croissance chez la vigne: influences foliaires. Vitis 23, 231–241.
Gerardeaux E, Jordan-Meille L, Constantin J, Pellerin S, Dingkuhn M (2010) Changes in plant morphology and dry matter partitioning caused by potassium deficiency in Gossypium hirsutum (L.). Environmental and Experimental Botany 67, 451–459.
| Changes in plant morphology and dry matter partitioning caused by potassium deficiency in Gossypium hirsutum (L.).Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD1MXhsVGmurrN&md5=fb3bba32e17b6c7e3faa19e01c51de91CAS |
Greer DH, Weston C (2010) Effects of fruiting on vegetative growth and development dynamics of grapevines (Vitis vinifera cv. Semillon) can be traced back to events at or before budbreak. Functional Plant Biology 37, 756–766.
| Effects of fruiting on vegetative growth and development dynamics of grapevines (Vitis vinifera cv. Semillon) can be traced back to events at or before budbreak.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Jaillon O, Aury J-M, Noel B, Policriti A, Clepet C, Casagrande A, Choisne N, Aubourg S, Vitulo N, Jubin C, Vezzi A, Legeai F, Hugueney P, Dasilva C, Horner D, Mica E, Jublot D, Poulain J, Bruyère C, Billault A, Segurens B, Gouyvenoux M, Ugarte E, Cattonaro F, Anthouard V, Vico V, Del Fabbro C, Alaux M, Di Gaspero G, Dumas V, Felice N, Paillard S, Juman I, Moroldo M, Scalabrin S, Canaguier A, Le Clainche I, Malacrida G, Durand E, Pesole G, Laucou V, Chatelet P, Merdinoglu D, Delledonne M, Pezzotti M, Lecharny A, Scarpelli C, Artiguenave F, Pè ME, Valle G, Morgante M, Caboche M, Adam-Blondon A-F, Weissenbach J, Quétier F, Wincker P,, for The French–Italian Public Consortium for Grapevine Genome Characterization (2007) The grapevine genome sequence suggests ancestral hexaploidization in major angiosperm phyla. Nature 449, 463–467.
| The grapevine genome sequence suggests ancestral hexaploidization in major angiosperm phyla.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD2sXhtV2is7%2FF&md5=2a0967ee91cf4ac4f3fb1d6fc1fb9605CAS |
Jones TH, Cullis BR, Clingeleffer PR, Ruhl EH (2009) Effects of novel hybrid and traditional rootstocks on vigour and yield components of Shiraz grapevines. Australian Journal of Grape and Wine Research 15, 284–292.
| Effects of novel hybrid and traditional rootstocks on vigour and yield components of Shiraz grapevines.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Lebon E, Pellegrino A, Tardieu F, Lecoeur J (2004) Shoot development in grapevine (Vitis vinifera) is affected by the modular branching pattern of the stem and intra- and inter-shoot trophic competition. Annals of Botany 93, 263–274.
| Shoot development in grapevine (Vitis vinifera) is affected by the modular branching pattern of the stem and intra- and inter-shoot trophic competition.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Lebon E, Pellegrino A, Louarn G, Lecoeur J (2006) Branch development controls leaf area dynamics in grapevine (Vitis vinifera) growing in drying soil. Annals of Botany 98, 175–185.
| Branch development controls leaf area dynamics in grapevine (Vitis vinifera) growing in drying soil.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Lefort PL, Législe N (1977) Quantitive stock–scion relationships in vine. Preliminary investigations by the analysis of reciprocal graftings. Vitis 16, 149–161.
May P (1994) ‘Using grapevine rootstocks: the Australian perspective’ (Winetitles: Adelaide, Australia.)
Mullins MG, Bouquet A, Williams LE (1992) ‘Biology of the grapevine.’ (Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK.)
Ollat N, Tandonnet JP, Bordenave L, Decroocq S, Gény L, Gaudillere JP, Fouquet R, Barrieu F, Hamdi S (2003) La vigueur conférée par le porte-greffe: hypothèses et pistes de recherches. Bulletin de l’OIV 869/870, 581–595.
Pallas B, Louarn G, Christophe A, Lebon E, Lecoeur J (2008) Influence of intra-shoot trophic competition on shoot development in two grapevine cultivars (Vitis vinifera). Physiologia Plantarum 134, 49–63.
| Influence of intra-shoot trophic competition on shoot development in two grapevine cultivars (Vitis vinifera).Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD1cXhtFChtb3F&md5=e8873af1f4226eaf578b5da3a48d8459CAS |
Pallas B, Christophe A, Lecoeur J (2010) Are the common assimilate pool and trophic relationships appropriate for dealing with the observed plasticity of grapevine development? Annals of Botany 105, 233–247.
| Are the common assimilate pool and trophic relationships appropriate for dealing with the observed plasticity of grapevine development?Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:STN:280:DC%2BC3c%2FnsV2ltA%3D%3D&md5=6ea206551d7f1576b0e94a1b3265fb57CAS |
Plenet D, Etchebest S, Mollier A, Pellerin S (2000) Growth analysis of maize field crops under phosphorus deficiency – I. Leaf growth. Plant and Soil 223, 117–130.
R Development Core Team (2005) ‘R: a language and environment for statistical computing, reference index version 2.8.1. http://www.R-project.org.’ (R Foundation for Statistical Computing: Vienna)
Rickman RW, Klepper BL (1995) The phyllochron – where do we go in the future? Crop Science 35, 44–49.
| The phyllochron – where do we go in the future?Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Schultz H, Matthews M (1988) Vegetative growth distribution during water deficits in Vitis vinifera L. Australian Journal of Plant Physiology 15, 641–656.
| Vegetative growth distribution during water deficits in Vitis vinifera L.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Tandonnet JP, Soyer JP, Gaudillere JP, Decroocq S, Bordenave L, Ollat N (2008) Long term effects of nitrogen and water supply on confered vigour and yield by SO4 and Riparia Gloire de Montpellier rootstocks. Journal International Des Sciences De La Vigne Et Du Vin 42, 89–98.
Tandonnet JP, Cookson S, Vivin P, Ollat N (2010) Scion genotype controls biomass allocation and root development in grafted grapevine. Australian Journal of Grape and Wine Research 16, 290–300.
| Scion genotype controls biomass allocation and root development in grafted grapevine.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Turnbull CGN, Booker JP, Leyser HMO (2002) Micrografting techniques for testing long-distance signalling in Arabidopsis. The Plant Journal 32, 255–262.
| Micrografting techniques for testing long-distance signalling in Arabidopsis.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD38XovFGqtrc%3D&md5=d1d4fcc7923d981a023c9fa07740f597CAS |
Vos J, van der Putten PEL, Birch CJ (2005) Effect of nitrogen supply on leaf appearance, leaf growth, leaf nitrogen economy and photosynthetic capacity in maize (Zea mays L.). Field Crops Research 93, 64–73.
| Effect of nitrogen supply on leaf appearance, leaf growth, leaf nitrogen economy and photosynthetic capacity in maize (Zea mays L.).Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Walker R, Clingeleffer P (2009) Rootstock attributes and selection for Australian conditions. Australian Viticulture 13, 69–76.
Wooldridge J, Louw PJE, Conradie WJ (2010) Effects of rootstock on grapevine performance, petiole and must composition, and overall wine score of Vitis vinifera cv. Chardonnay and Pinot Noir. South African Journal of Enology and Viticulture 31, 45–48.
