Register      Login
Functional Plant Biology Functional Plant Biology Society
Plant function and evolutionary biology
RESEARCH FRONT

Genetic variability for root morph-architecture traits and root growth dynamics as related to phosphorus efficiency in soybean

Junhua Ao A B , Jiabing Fu A C , Jiang Tian A , Xiaolong Yan A and Hong Liao A D
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations

A Root Biology Center, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou 510642, PR China.

B Guangzhou Sugarcane Industry Research Institute, Guangzhou 510316, PR China.

C CNAMP Shenzhen Fertilizer LTD, Shenzhen 518067, PR China.

D Corresponding author. Email: hliao@scau.edu.cn

Functional Plant Biology 37(4) 304-312 https://doi.org/10.1071/FP09215
Submitted: 12 August 2009  Accepted: 22 January 2010   Published: 26 March 2010

Abstract

Root morphology and architecture are believed to be important for plant phosphorus (P) efficiency, but their genetic information is relatively scarce. In the present study, a field and a specially designed minirhizotron experiments were conducted using two soybean (Glycine max L. Merr.) genotypes and their 88 recombinant inbred lines (RILs) to elucidate the genetic variability for root morph-architecture traits and root growth dynamics as related to P efficiency in soybean. The results indicated that the root morph-architecture traits were continually segregated in the RILs with a normal distribution, indicating which are possibly controlled by quantitative trait loci. Significantly positive correlations were found between root and P traits, suggesting feasibility of screening P efficient genotype through simple selection of root traits in field. Most root morph-architecture traits were closely correlated, showing a coordinating contribution to P efficiency. Furthermore, root morphological traits always had higher heritability than architecture traits, thus, could serve as more reliable index in field selection. The dynamic parameters of root growth from the minirhizotron experiment showed that the P efficient genotype established longer and larger root system with preferring distribution in surface layer and also kept more active roots, therefore, had a better growth performance in field, than the P-inefficient genotype. Taken together, this is the first report on in situ root growth dynamics and its relation to P efficiency using minirhizotron systems in crops. Our findings help to better understand the relationships between P efficiency and root traits and, thus, facilitate development of P efficient genotypes in crops.

Additional keywords: recombinant inbred lines, variation.


Acknowledgements

This research was support in part by the National Key Basic Research Special Funds of China, the McKnight Foundation Collaborative Crop Research Program and the National Natural Science Foundation of China.


References


Barber SA (1995) ‘Soil nutrient bioavailability: a mechanistic approach.’ (John Wiley & Sons: New York)

Beebe SE, Rojas-Pierce M, Yan XL, Blair MW, Pedraza F, Munoz F, Tohme J, Lynch JP (2006) Quantitative trait loci for root architecture traits correlated with phosphorus acquisition in common bean. Crop Science 46, 413–423.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | CAS | open url image1

Chang KY, Lo HF, Lai YC, Yao PJ, Lin KH, Hwang SY (2009) Identification of quantitative trait loci associated with yield-related traits in sweet potato (Ipomoea batatas). Botanical Studies 50, 43–55.
CAS |
open url image1

Chevalier F, Pata M, Nacry P, Doumas P, Rossignol M (2003) Effects of phosphate availability on the root system architecture: large-scale analysis of the natural variation between Arabidopsis accessions. Plant, Cell & Environment 26, 1839–1850.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | CAS | open url image1

Devaiah BN, Nagarajan VK, Raghothama KG (2007) Phosphate homeostasis and root development in Arabidopsis are synchronized by the zinc finger transcription factor ZAT6. Plant Physiology 145, 147–159.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | CAS | PubMed | open url image1

Fita A, Pico B, Monforte AJ, Nuez F (2008) Genetics of root system architecture using near-isogenic lines of melon. Journal of the American Society for Horticultural Science 133, 448–458. open url image1

Hendrick RL, Pregitzer KS (1996) Applications of minirhizotrons to understand root function in forests and other natural ecosystems. Plant and Soil 185, 293–304.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | CAS | open url image1

Johnson MG, Tingey DT, Phillips DL, Storm MJ (2001) Advancing fine root research with minirhizotrons. Environmental and Experimental Botany 45, 263–289.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | PubMed | open url image1

Lao JS (1988) ‘Handbook of soil agro-chemistry analysis.’ (Agriculture Press: Beijing)

Li JZ, Xie Y, Dai AY, Liu LF, Li ZC (2009) Root and shoot traits responses to phosphorus deficiency and QTL analysis at seedling stage using introgression lines of rice. Journal of Genetics and Genomics 36, 173–183.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | CAS | PubMed | open url image1

Liao H, Yan XL (1999) Seed size is closely related to P use efficiency and photosynthetic P use efficiency in common bean. Journal of Plant Nutrition 22, 877–888.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | CAS | open url image1

Liao H, Rubio G, Yan XL, Cao AQ, Brown KM, Lynch JP (2001) Effect of phosphorus availability on basal root shallowness in common bean. Plant and Soil 232, 69–79.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | CAS | PubMed | open url image1

Liao H, Yan XL, Rubio G, Beebe SE, Blair MW, Lynch JP (2004) Genetic mapping of basal root gravitropism and phosphorus acquisition efficiency in common bean. Functional Plant Biology 31, 959–970.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | CAS | open url image1

Løes A, Gahoonia T (2004) Genetic variation in specific root length in scandinavian wheat and barley accessions. Euphytica 137, 243–249.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Lynch JP (1995) Root architecture and plant productivity. Plant Physiology 109, 7–13.
CAS | PubMed |
open url image1

Miura K, Rus A, Sharkhuu A, Yokoi S, Karthikeyan A , et al. (2005) The Arabidopsis SUMO E3 ligase SIZ1 controls phosphate deficiency responses. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 102, 7760–7765.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | CAS | PubMed | open url image1

Raghothama KG (1999) Phosphate acquisition. Annual Review of Plant Physiology and Plant Molecular Biology 50, 665–693.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | CAS | PubMed | open url image1

Roboson AD (1983) Mineral nutrition. In ‘Nitrogen fixation of legumes. Vol. 3’. (Ed. WJ Broughton) pp. 33–55. (Clarendon Press: Oxford)

Sattelmacher B, Horst WJ, Becker HC (1994) Factors that contribute to genetic variation for nutrient efficiency of crop plants. Journal of Plant Nutrition and Soil Science 157, 215–224.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | CAS | open url image1

Shimizu A, Kato K, Komatsu A, Motomura K, Ikehashi H (2008) Genetic analysis of root elongation induced by phosphorus deficiency in rice (Oryza sativa L.): fine QTL mapping and multivariate analysis of related traits. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 117, 987–996.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | CAS | PubMed | open url image1

Vance CP, Uhde-Stone C, Allan DL (2003) Phosphorus acquisition and use: critical adaptations by plants for securing a nonrenewable resource. New Phytologist 157, 423–447.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | CAS | open url image1

Wang LD, Liao H, Yan XL, Zhuang BC, Dong YS (2004) Genetic variability for root hair traits as related to phosphorus status in soybean. Plant and Soil 261, 77–84.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | CAS | open url image1

Yan XL, Lynch JP, Beebe SE (1995) P efficiency in common bean genotypes in contrasting soil types. I. Vegetative response. Crop Science 35, 1086–1093. open url image1

Zhao J, Fu JB, Liao H, He Y, Nian H, Hu YM, Qiu LJ, Dong YS, Yan XL (2004) Characterization of root architecture in an applied core collection for phosphorus efficiency of soybean germplasm. Chinese Science Bulletin 49, 1611–1620.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | CAS | open url image1