Register      Login
Functional Plant Biology Functional Plant Biology Society
Plant function and evolutionary biology
RESEARCH ARTICLE

Hydraulic conductance differences among sorghum genotypes to explain variation in restricted transpiration rates

Sunita Choudhary A and Thomas R. Sinclair A B
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations

A Crop Science Department, Campus Box 7620, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27695-7620, USA.

B Corresponding author. Email: trsincla@ncsu.edu

Functional Plant Biology 41(3) 270-275 https://doi.org/10.1071/FP13246
Submitted: 19 August 2013  Accepted: 3 September 2013   Published: 11 October 2013

Abstract

Sorghum (Sorghum bicolor L.) is an important crop for production in dryland regions of the globe. Traits identified in many sorghum lines that apparently make them adapted for dryland conditions are restricted transpiration rate both early in the soil drying cycle and under high atmospheric vapour pressure deficit. It was hypothesised that these responses could be a result of differences in hydraulic conductance of the plants: those with low hydraulic conductance would be more likely to express restricted transpiration rates. The location of the lower hydraulic conductance in the plant could also be important with a low conductance in the leaf xylem to stomata pathway possibly being more advantageous than in the root. In this study, the amount and location of the hydraulic conductance was measured in 20 sorghum genotypes. Those genotypes that expressed an early decrease in transpiration rate with soil drying had greater plant and leaf hydraulic conductance than those genotypes that had the later decreases in transpiration rate, which was in contrast with what was hypothesised. However, sorghum genotypes that segregated between two groups based on expression of a maximum transpiration trait also segregated based on their hydraulic conductance. Those genotypes that expressed the maximum transpiration trait had lower hydraulic conductance for the intact plant and in the leaves.

Additional keywords: drought tolerance, soil water conservation, water use.


References

Borrell AK, Hammer GL (2000) Nitrogen dynamics and the physiological basis of stay-green in sorghum. Crop Science 40, 1295–1307.
Nitrogen dynamics and the physiological basis of stay-green in sorghum.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Brodribb TJ, Jordan GJ (2008) Internal coordination between hydraulic and stomatal control in leaves. Plant, Cell & Environment 31, 1557–1564.
Internal coordination between hydraulic and stomatal control in leaves.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Brodribb TJ, Holbrook NM, Gutierrez MV (2002) Hydraulic and photosynthetic co-ordination in seasonally dry tropical forest trees. Plant, Cell & Environment 25, 1435–1444.
Hydraulic and photosynthetic co-ordination in seasonally dry tropical forest trees.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Choudhary S, Mutava RN, Shekoofa A, Sinclair TR, Prasad PVV (2013a) Is the stay-green trait in sorghum a result of transpiration sensitivity to either soil drying or vapor pressure deficit? Crop Science 53, 2129–2134.
Is the stay-green trait in sorghum a result of transpiration sensitivity to either soil drying or vapor pressure deficit?Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Choudhary S, Sinclair TR, Prasad PVV (2013b) Hydraulic conductance of intact plants of two contrasting sorghum lines SC15 and SC1205. Functional Plant Biology 40, 730–738.
Hydraulic conductance of intact plants of two contrasting sorghum lines SC15 and SC1205.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BC3sXhtFSrtrrF&md5=80e83c0ead35766f12f0dbec99fa4f94CAS |

Cruz RT, Jordan WR, Drew MC (1992) Structural changes and associated reduction of hydraulic conductance in roots of Sorghum biocolor L. following exposure to water deficit. Plant Physiology 99, 203–212.
Structural changes and associated reduction of hydraulic conductance in roots of Sorghum biocolor L. following exposure to water deficit.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DyaK38XksVCks78%3D&md5=bc14f97f1f6ab6257712c65e1e5a686cCAS | 16668850PubMed |

Devi MJ, Sinclair TR, Vadez V (2010) Genotypic variability among peanut (Arachis hypogea L.) in sensitivity of nitrogen fixation to soil drying. Plant and Soil 330, 139–148.
Genotypic variability among peanut (Arachis hypogea L.) in sensitivity of nitrogen fixation to soil drying.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BC3cXktFequ7g%3D&md5=abe6823369ac50fa664df5234fa02dcbCAS |

FAO and ICRISAT (1996) ‘The world sorghum and millet economies: facts, trends and outlook.’ (Food and Agricultural Organization of the United Nations: Rome, Italy)

Fletcher AL, Sinclair TR, Allen LH (2007) Transpiration responses to vapor pressure deficit in well watered ‘slow wilting’ and commercial soybean. Environmental and Experimental Botany 61, 145–151.
Transpiration responses to vapor pressure deficit in well watered ‘slow wilting’ and commercial soybean.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD2sXpvF2qtb8%3D&md5=2f99c27966e6fa1cc682beb099cb9a41CAS |

Gholipoor M, Prasad PVV, Mutava RN, Sinclair TR (2010) Genetic variability of transpiration response to vapor pressure deficit among sorghum genotypes. Field Crops Research 119, 85–90.
Genetic variability of transpiration response to vapor pressure deficit among sorghum genotypes.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Gholipoor M, Sinclair TR, Prasad PVV (2012) Genotypic variation within sorghum for transpiration response to drying soil. Plant and Soil 357, 35–40.
Genotypic variation within sorghum for transpiration response to drying soil.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BC38XhtVegt7jJ&md5=10b2fdaa2a3979b7fe6e742e1f84a45aCAS |

Gholipoor M, Choudhary S, Sinclair TR, Messina CD, Cooper M (2013) Transpiration response of maize hybrids to atmospheric vapor pressure deficit. Journal Agronomy & Crop Science 199, 155–160.
Transpiration response of maize hybrids to atmospheric vapor pressure deficit.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Gilbert ME, Holbrook NM, Zwieniecki MA, Sinclair TR (2011) Field confirmation of genetic variation in soybean transpiration response to vapor pressure deficit and photosynthetic compensation. Field Crops Research 124, 85–92.
Field confirmation of genetic variation in soybean transpiration response to vapor pressure deficit and photosynthetic compensation.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Kholova J, Hash CT, Kakkera A, Kocova M, Vadez V (2010) Constitutive water conserving mechanisms are correlated with the terminal drought tolerance of pearl millet (Pennisetum glaucum (L.) R.Br.). Journal of Experimental Botany 61, 369–377.
Constitutive water conserving mechanisms are correlated with the terminal drought tolerance of pearl millet (Pennisetum glaucum (L.) R.Br.).Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BC3cXktlGnsg%3D%3D&md5=255b5857da23965b7460ab71a3d4e701CAS | 19861657PubMed |

Maqbool AB, Prathibha D, Mariam BS (2001) Biotechnology: genetic improvement of sorghum (Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench). In Vitro Cellular & Developmental Biology. Plant 37, 504–515.
Biotechnology: genetic improvement of sorghum (Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench).Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Matsuo N, Ozawa K, Mochizuki T (2009) Genotypic differences in root hydraulic conductance of rice (Oryza sativa L.) in response to water regimes. Plant and Soil 316, 25–34.
Genotypic differences in root hydraulic conductance of rice (Oryza sativa L.) in response to water regimes.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD1MXhsFOksbw%3D&md5=7432b280881050ee320427fda91ef166CAS |

Meinzer FC (2002) Co-ordination of vapour and liquid phase water transport properties in plants. Plant, Cell & Environment 25, 265–274.
Co-ordination of vapour and liquid phase water transport properties in plants.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Passioura JB, Munns R (1984) Hydraulic resistance of plants. II. Effects of the rooting medium, and time of the day, in barley and lupin. Australian Journal of Plant Physiology 11, 341–350.
Hydraulic resistance of plants. II. Effects of the rooting medium, and time of the day, in barley and lupin.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Richards RA, Passioura JB (1989) A breeding program to reduce the diameter of the major xylem vessel in the seminal roots of wheat and its effect on grain yield in rain-fed environments. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 40, 943–950.
A breeding program to reduce the diameter of the major xylem vessel in the seminal roots of wheat and its effect on grain yield in rain-fed environments.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Sack L, Holbrook NM (2006) Leaf hydraulics. Annual Review of Plant Biology 57, 361–381.
Leaf hydraulics.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD28XosVKhtrs%3D&md5=3f502b84989933bacc5535c1045bdb19CAS | 16669766PubMed |

Sack L, Cowan PD, Jaikumar N, Holbrook NM (2003) The ‘hydrology’ of leaves: co-ordination of structure and function in temperate woody species. Plant, Cell & Environment 26, 1343–1356.
The ‘hydrology’ of leaves: co-ordination of structure and function in temperate woody species.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Saliendra NZ, Meinzer FC (1992) Genotypic, developmental and drought-induced differences in root hydraulic conductance of contrasting sugarcane cultivars. Journal of Experimental Botany 43, 1209–1217.
Genotypic, developmental and drought-induced differences in root hydraulic conductance of contrasting sugarcane cultivars.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Sinclair TR, Hammer GL, van Oosterom EJ (2005) Potential yield and water-use efficiency benefits in sorghum from limited maximum transpiration rate. Functional Plant Biology 32, 945–952.
Potential yield and water-use efficiency benefits in sorghum from limited maximum transpiration rate.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Sinclair TR, Zwieniecki MA, Holbrook NM (2008) Low leaf hydraulic conductance associated with drought tolerance in soybean. Physiologia Plantarum 132, 446–451.
Low leaf hydraulic conductance associated with drought tolerance in soybean.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD1cXksFWktb4%3D&md5=47d8b0752057897d1ff441203c1fa497CAS | 18333998PubMed |

Stephens JC, Miller FR, Rosenow DT (1967) Conversion of alien sorghums to early combine genotypes. Crop Science 7, 396
Conversion of alien sorghums to early combine genotypes.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Trillo N, Fernandez RJ (2005) Wheat plant hydraulic properties under prolonged experimental drought: Stronger decline in root-system conductance than in leaf area. Plant and Soil 277, 277–284.
Wheat plant hydraulic properties under prolonged experimental drought: Stronger decline in root-system conductance than in leaf area.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD2MXht1GlsLrI&md5=ddcad0502105ad0938e3d6be6db49837CAS |

Zaman-Allah M, Jenkinson DM, Vadez V (2011) Chickpea genotypes contrasting for seed yield under terminal drought stress in the field differ for traits related to the control of water use. Functional Plant Biology 38, 270–281.
Chickpea genotypes contrasting for seed yield under terminal drought stress in the field differ for traits related to the control of water use.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Zwieniecki MA, Brodribb TJ, Holbrook NM (2007) Hydraulic design of leaves: Insights from rehydration kinetics. Plant, Cell & Environment 30, 910–921.
Hydraulic design of leaves: Insights from rehydration kinetics.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |