Free Standard AU & NZ Shipping For All Book Orders Over $80!
Register      Login
Functional Plant Biology Functional Plant Biology Society
Plant function and evolutionary biology
RESEARCH ARTICLE

Water redistribution determines photosynthetic responses to warming and drying in two polar mosses

Daniel E. Stanton A D , Morgane Merlin A B , Gary Bryant C and Marilyn C. Ball A
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations

A Plant Science Division, Research School of Biology, The Australian National University, Canberra, ACT 0200, Australia.

B École Normale Supérieure, 75005 Paris, France.

C School of Applied Sciences, RMIT, Melbourne Vic. 3001, Australia.

D Corresponding author. Email: daniel.stanton@anu.edu.au

Functional Plant Biology 41(2) 178-186 https://doi.org/10.1071/FP13160
Submitted: 27 May 2013  Accepted: 14 August 2013   Published: 13 September 2013

Abstract

Predicting impacts of climate change requires an understanding of the sensitivity of species to temperature, including conflated changes in humidity. Physiological responses to temperature and clump-to-air vapour pressure difference (VPD) were compared in two Antarctic moss species, Ceratodon purpureus (Hedw.) Brid. and Schistidium antarctici (Cardot) L.I. Savicz & Smirnova. Temperatures from 8 to 24°C had no significant effects on photosynthesis or recovery from drying, whereas high VPD accelerated drying. In Schistidium, which lacks internal conduction structures, shoots dried more slowly than the clump, and photosynthesis ceased at high shoot relative water content (RWC), behaviour consistent with a strategy of drought avoidance although desiccation tolerant. In contrast, shoots of Ceratodon have a central vascular core, but dried more rapidly than the clump. These results imply that cavitation of the hydroid strand enables hydraulic isolation of extremities during rapid drying, effectively slowing water loss from the clump. Ceratodon maintained photosynthetic activity during drying to lower shoot RWC than Schistidium, consistent with a strategy of drought tolerance. These ecophysiological characteristics may provide a functional explanation for the differential distribution of Schistidium and Ceratodon along moisture gradients in Antarctica. Thus, predicting responses of non-vascular vegetation to climate change at high latitudes requires greater focus on VPD and hydraulics than temperature.

Additional keywords: Antarctic bryophytes, Ceratodon, climate change, hydraulics, Schistidium, temperature response, VPD.


References

Berry J, Bjorkman O (1980) Photosynthetic response and adaptation to temperature in higher plants. Annual Review of Plant Physiology and Plant Molecular Biology 31, 491–543.
Photosynthetic response and adaptation to temperature in higher plants.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Bölter M (1992) Environmental conditions and microbiological properties from soils and lichens from Antarctica (Casey Station, Wilkes Land). Polar Biology 11, 591–599.
Environmental conditions and microbiological properties from soils and lichens from Antarctica (Casey Station, Wilkes Land).Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Clarke LJ, Robinson SA, Hua Q, Ayre DJ, Fink D (2012) Radiocarbon bomb spike reveals biological effects of Antarctic climate change. Global Change Biology 18, 301–310.
Radiocarbon bomb spike reveals biological effects of Antarctic climate change.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Coe KK, Belnap J, Sparks JP (2012) Precipitation-driven carbon balance controls survivorship of desert biocrust mosses. Ecology 93, 1626–1636.
Precipitation-driven carbon balance controls survivorship of desert biocrust mosses.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 22919909PubMed |

Davey MC, Rothery P (1997) Interspecific variation in respiratory and photosynthetic parameters in Antarctic bryophytes. New Phytologist 137, 231–240.
Interspecific variation in respiratory and photosynthetic parameters in Antarctic bryophytes.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Dilks TJK, Proctor MCF (1979) Photosynthesis, respiration and water-content in bryophytes. New Phytologist 82, 97–114.
Photosynthesis, respiration and water-content in bryophytes.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Elumeeva TG, Soudzilovskaia NA, During HJ, Cornelissen JHC (2011) The importance of colony structure versus shoot morphology for the water balance of 22 subarctic bryophyte species. Journal of Vegetation Science 22, 152–164.
The importance of colony structure versus shoot morphology for the water balance of 22 subarctic bryophyte species.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Franks PJ, Cowan IR, Farquhar GD (1997) The apparent feedforward response of stomata to air vapour pressure deficit: information revealed by different experimental procedures with two rainforest trees. Plant, Cell & Environment 20, 142–145.
The apparent feedforward response of stomata to air vapour pressure deficit: information revealed by different experimental procedures with two rainforest trees.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Hébant C (1977) ‘The conducting tissues of bryophytes.’ (J. Cramer Verlag: Vaduz, Liechtenstein)

Kudoh S, Kashino Y, Imura S (2003) Ecological studies of aquatic moss pillars in Antarctic lakes 3. Light response and chilling and heat sensitivity of photosynthesis. Polar Bioscience 16, 33–42.

Lenné T, Bryant G, Hocart CH, Huang CX, Ball MC (2010) Freeze avoidance: a dehydrating moss gathers no ice. Plant, Cell & Environment 33, 1731–1741.
Freeze avoidance: a dehydrating moss gathers no ice.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Ligrone R, Duckett JG, Renzaglia KS (2000) Conducting tissues and phyletic relationships of bryophytes. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological Sciences 355, 795–813.
Conducting tissues and phyletic relationships of bryophytes.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:STN:280:DC%2BD3M%2FjtFymsw%3D%3D&md5=44c3dc67ba2f7708eb7338a21bb2c81aCAS | 10905610PubMed |

Longton RE (1988) ‘The biology of polar bryophytes and lichens.’ (Cambridge University Press: Cambridge)

Lovelock CE, Osmond CB, Seppelt RD (1995) Photoinhibition in the Antarctic moss Grimmia antarctici Card when exposed to cycles of freezing and thawing. Plant, Cell & Environment 18, 1395–1402.
Photoinhibition in the Antarctic moss Grimmia antarctici Card when exposed to cycles of freezing and thawing.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Maxwell K, Johnson GN (2000) Chlorophyll fluorescence--a practical guide. Journal of Experimental Botany 51, 659–668.
Chlorophyll fluorescence--a practical guide.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD3cXjtF2js74%3D&md5=bc22e4e77aa4127dd9f2794b99d9a4f9CAS | 10938857PubMed |

Melick D, Seppelt R (1997) Vegetation patterns in relation to climatic and endogenous changes in Wilkes Land, continental Antarctica. Journal of Ecology 85, 43–56.
Vegetation patterns in relation to climatic and endogenous changes in Wilkes Land, continental Antarctica.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Ochyra R, Lewis Smith RI, Bednarek-Ochyra H (2008) ‘The illustrated moss flora of Antarctica.’ (Cambridge University Press: Cambridge)

Okitsu S, Imura S, Ayukawa E (2004) Micro-relief distribution of major mosses in ice-free areas along the Soya Coast, the Syowa Station Area, east Antarctica. Polar Bioscience 17, 69–82.

Oliver MJ, Velten J, Mishler BD (2005) Desiccation tolerance in bryophytes: a reflection of the primitive strategy for plant survival in dehydrating habitats? Integrative and Comparative Biology 45, 788–799.
Desiccation tolerance in bryophytes: a reflection of the primitive strategy for plant survival in dehydrating habitats?Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 21676830PubMed |

Pannewitz S, Green TGA, Maysek K, Schlensog M, Seppelt R, Sancho LG, Türk R, Schroeter B (2005) Photosynthetic responses of three common mosses from continental Antarctica. Antarctic Science 17, 341–352.
Photosynthetic responses of three common mosses from continental Antarctica.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Pinheiro J, Bates D, DebRoy S, Sarkar D, R Core Team (2013) ‘nlme: Linear and nonlinear mixed effects models. R package ver. 3.’ pp. 1–108. (R Foundation for Statistical Computing: Austria)

Proctor MCF (2000) The bryophyte paradox: tolerance of desiccation, evasion of drought. Plant Ecology 151, 41–49.
The bryophyte paradox: tolerance of desiccation, evasion of drought.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Proctor MCF, Tuba Z (2002) Poikilohydry and homoihydry: antithesis or spectrum of possibilities? New Phytologist 156, 327–349.
Poikilohydry and homoihydry: antithesis or spectrum of possibilities?Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Proctor MCF, Oliver MJ, Wood AJ, Alpert P, Stark LR, Cleavitt NL, Mishler BD (2007) Desiccation-tolerance in bryophytes: a review. The Bryologist 110, 595–621.
Desiccation-tolerance in bryophytes: a review.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD1cXpvVCmsA%3D%3D&md5=f249ee3224c08c6b9cefce798e101927CAS |

Rice SK, Schneider N (2004) Cushion size, surface roughness, and the control of water balance and carbon flux in the cushion moss Leucobryum glaucum (Leucobryaceae). American Journal of Botany 91, 1164–1172.
Cushion size, surface roughness, and the control of water balance and carbon flux in the cushion moss Leucobryum glaucum (Leucobryaceae).Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 21653472PubMed |

Rice SK, Collins D, Anderson AM (2001) Functional significance of variation in bryophyte canopy structure. American Journal of Botany 88, 1568–1576.
Functional significance of variation in bryophyte canopy structure.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:STN:280:DC%2BC3Mngt1aktg%3D%3D&md5=8eec015735a3b6a124ac266fabe465beCAS | 21669689PubMed |

Robinson SA, Wasley J, Popp M, Lovelock CE (2000) Desiccation tolerance of three moss species from continental Antarctica. Functional Plant Biology 27, 379–388.
Desiccation tolerance of three moss species from continental Antarctica.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD3cXksF2rs7s%3D&md5=da09bbdfe09e2450825ff00ae97dba60CAS |

Selkirk PM, Seppelt RD (1987) Species distribution within a moss bed in greater Antarctica. Symposia Biologica Hungarica 35, 279–284.

Slatyer RO (1967) ‘Plant–water relationships.’ (Academic Press: London)

Tansley AG, Chick E (1901) Notes on the conducting tissue-system in Bryophyta. Annals of Botany 15, 1–38.

Wasley J, Robinson SA, Lovelock CE, Popp M (2006) Some like it wet – biological characteristics underpinning tolerance of extreme water stress events in Antarctic bryophytes. Functional Plant Biology 33, 443–455.
Some like it wet – biological characteristics underpinning tolerance of extreme water stress events in Antarctic bryophytes.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Wilson JW (1957) Observations on the temperatures of Arctic plants and their environment. Journal of Ecology 45, 499–531.
Observations on the temperatures of Arctic plants and their environment.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Yamakawa H, Fukushima Y, Itoh S, Heber U (2012) Three different mechanisms of energy dissipation of a desiccation-tolerant moss serve one common purpose: to protect reaction centres against photo-oxidation. Journal of Experimental Botany 63, 3765–3775.
Three different mechanisms of energy dissipation of a desiccation-tolerant moss serve one common purpose: to protect reaction centres against photo-oxidation.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BC38XhtVSht7fP&md5=6050f4b4b4026d696d735da22769b246CAS | 22438303PubMed |

Zotz G, Schweikert A, Jetz W, Westerman H (2000) Water relations and carbon gain are closely related to cushion size in the moss Grimmia pulvinata. New Phytologist 148, 59–67.
Water relations and carbon gain are closely related to cushion size in the moss Grimmia pulvinata.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |