A crispa null mutant facilitates identification of a crispa-like pseudogene in pea
Frank Sainsbury A , Alexander D. Tattersall A B , Michael J. Ambrose A , Lynda Turner A , T. H. Noel Ellis A and Julie M. I. Hofer A CA Department of Crop Genetics, John Innes Centre, Norwich NR4 7UH, UK.
B Current address; Department of Plant Sciences, Oxford University, South Parks Road, Oxford OX1 3RB, UK.
C Corresponding author. Email: julie.hofer@bbsrc.ac.uk
D This paper originates from a presentation at the Third International Conference on Legume Genomics and Genetics, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia, April 2006.
Functional Plant Biology 33(8) 757-763 https://doi.org/10.1071/FP06090
Submitted: 19 April 2006 Accepted: 8 June 2006 Published: 2 August 2006
Abstract
The genomes of several legume species contain two Phantastica-like genes. Previous studies on leaf development have found that Phantastica confers leaf blade adaxial identity in plant species with simple leaves and leaflet adaxial identity in pea (Pisum sativum L.), a legume with compound leaves. Previous characterisation of the phantastica mutant of pea, crispa, showed it had radialised leaflets, but stipules were not radialised. This suggested either that mutation of a second redundant gene was required for radialisation of stipules, or, that a null mutation was required. Previously characterised crispa mutants may not have exhibited radialised stipules because they were weak alleles. In this work we show that pea has a second Phantastica-like gene, which lies on a different chromosome to Crispa. The second gene was found to be a pseudogene in several genotypes of pea, therefore it would not have a role in conferring stipule adaxial identity. A new deletion mutant, crispa-4 was identified. The mutant has radialised stipules and leaflets, showing that Crispa confers adaxial identity on both these organs in pea. The nucleotide sequence data reported here are in the EMBL and GenBank Nucleotide Databases under the accession numbers DQ486060 (JI 2822), DQ486061 (JI 15), DQ486062 (JI 281) and DQ486063 (JI 399).
Keywords: adaxial, compound leaf, Crispa, Phantastica, pea, Pisum sativum, polarity.
Acknowledgments
FS was funded by the Marie Curie Early Stage Training Fellowship MEST-CT-2004–504273, JH was funded by the European Union Grain Legumes Integrated Project FOOD-CT-2004-506223. The authors thank Ruth Pothecary for assistance in the glasshouse and Andrew Davis for photography.
Byrne ME,
Barley R,
Curtis M,
Arroyo JM,
Dunham M,
Hudson A, Martienssen RA
(2000) Asymmetric leaves1 mediates leaf patterning and stem cell function in Arabidopsis. Nature 408, 967–971.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | PubMed |
Choi H-K,
Kim D-J,
Zhu H,
Mun J-H, Baek J-M , et al.
(2004) Conserved gene order between crop and model legume species. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 101, 15 289–15 294.
DeMason DA, Villani PJ
(2001) Genetic control of leaf development in pea. International Journal of Plant Sciences 162, 493–511.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Ellis THN,
Davies DR,
Castleton JA, Bedford ID
(1984) The organization and genetics of rDNA length variants in peas. Chromosoma 91, 74–81.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Ellis THN,
Turner L,
Hellens RP,
Lee D,
Harker CL,
Enard C,
Domoney C, Davies DR
(1992) Linkage maps in pea. Genetics 130, 649–663.
| PubMed |
Emery JF,
Floyd SK,
Alvarez J,
Eshed Y,
Hawker NP,
Izhaki A,
Baum SF, Bowman JL
(2003) Radial patterning of Arabidopsis shoots by class III HD-ZIP and KANADI genes. Current Biology 13, 1768–1774.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | PubMed |
Golz JF,
Roccaro M,
Kuzoff R, Hudson A
(2004) GRAMINIFOLIA promotes growth and polarity of Antirrhinum leaves. Development 131, 3661–3670.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | PubMed |
Gourlay CW,
Hofer JMI, Ellis THN
(2000) Pea compound leaf architecture is regulated by interactions among the genes UNIFOLIATA, COCHLEATA, AFILA, and TENDRIL-LESS. The Plant Cell 12, 1279–1294.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | PubMed |
Hofer JMI, Ellis THN
(1998) The genetic control of patterning in pea leaves. Trends in Plant Science 3, 439–444.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Hofer J,
Turner L,
Hellens R,
Ambrose M,
Matthews P,
Michael A, Ellis N
(1997) UNIFOLIATA regulates leaf and flower morphogenesis in pea. Current Biology 7, 581–587.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | PubMed |
Hofer J,
Gourlay C,
Michael A, Ellis THN
(2001) Expression of a class 1 knotted1-like homeobox gene is down-regulated in pea compound leaf primordia. Plant Molecular Biology 45, 387–398.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | PubMed |
Kerstetter RA,
Bollman K,
Taylor RA,
Bomblies K, Poethig RS
(2001) KANADI regulates organ polarity in Arabidopsis. Nature 411, 706–709.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | PubMed |
Kim M,
McCormick S,
Timmermans M, Sinha N
(2003a) The expression domain of PHANTASTICA determines leaflet placement in compound leaves. Nature 424, 438–443.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | PubMed |
Kim M,
Pham T,
Hamidi A,
McCormick S,
Kuzoff RK, Sinha N
(2003b) Reduced leaf complexity in tomato wiry mutants suggests a role for PHAN and KNOX genes in generating compound leaves. Development 130, 4405–4415.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | PubMed |
Lamm R
(1949) Contributions to the genetics of the Gp-chromosome of Pisum. Hereditas 41, 583–590.
Luo JH,
Yan J,
Weng L,
Yang J,
Zhao Z,
Chen JH,
Hu XH, Luo D
(2005) Different expression patterns of duplicated PHANTASTICA-like genes in Lotus japonicus suggest their divergent functions during compound leaf development. Cell Research 15, 665–677.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | PubMed |
McConnell JR,
Emery J,
Eshed Y,
Bao N,
Bowman J, Barton MK
(2001) Role of PHABULOSA and PHAVOLUTA in determining radial patterning in shoots. Nature 411, 709–713.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | PubMed |
Molinero-Rosales N,
Jamilena M,
Zurita S,
Gomez P,
Capel J, Lozano R
(1999) FALSIFLORA, the tomato orthologue of FLORICAULA and LEAFY, controls flowering time and floral meristem identity. The Plant Journal 20, 685–693.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | PubMed |
Siegfried KR,
Eshed Y,
Baum SF,
Otsuga D,
Drews GN, Bowman JL
(1999) Members of the YABBY gene family specify abaxial cell fate in Arabidopsis. Development 126, 4117–4128.
| PubMed |
Tattersall AD,
Turner L,
Knox MR,
Ambrose MJ,
Ellis THN, Hofer JMI
(2005) The mutant crispa reveals multiple roles for PHANTASTICA in pea compound leaf development. The Plant Cell 17, 1046–1060.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | PubMed |
Timmermans MCP,
Hudson A,
Becraft PW, Nelson T
(1999) ROUGH SHEATH2: a Myb protein that represses knox homeobox genes in maize lateral organ primordia. Science 284, 151–153.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | PubMed |
Tsiantis M,
Schneeberger R,
Golz JF,
Freeling M, Langdale JA
(1999) The maize rough sheath2 gene and leaf development programs in monocot and dicot plants. Science 284, 154–156.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | PubMed |
Waites R, Hudson A
(1995) Phantastica — a gene required for dorsoventrality of leaves in Antirrhinum majus. Development 121, 2143–2154.
Waites R,
Selvadurai HRN,
Oliver IR, Hudson A
(1998) The PHANTASTICA gene encodes a MYB transcription factor involved in growth and dorsoventrality of lateral organs in Antirrhinum. Cell 93, 779–789.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | PubMed |
Weeden NF,
Ellis THN,
Timmerman-Vaughan GM,
Swiecicki WK,
Rozov SM, Berdnikov VA
(1998) A consensus linkage map for Pisum sativum. Pisum Genetics 30, 1–4.
Wellensiek SJ
(1959) Neutronic mutations in peas. Euphytica 8, 209–215.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Zhu H,
Choi H-K,
Cook DR, Shoemaker RC
(2005) Bridging model and crop legumes through comparative genomics. Plant Physiology 137, 1189–1196.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | PubMed |