Articles citing this paper
Relationship Between Root/Soil Hydraulic Properties and Stomatal Behaviour in Sugarcane
NZ Saliendra and FC Meinzer
16(3) pp.241 - 250
26 articles found in Crossref database.
Deep‐water uptake under drought improved due to locally increased root conductivity in maize, but not in faba bean
Müllers Yannik,
Postma Johannes A.,
Poorter Hendrik, van Dusschoten Dagmar
Plant, Cell & Environment. 2023 46(7). p.2046
Co‐ordination of vapour and liquid phase water transport properties in plants
Meinzer F. C.
Plant, Cell & Environment. 2002 25(2). p.265
Plant-Environment Interactions (2000)
Effects of high atmospheric CO2 concentration on root hydraulic conductivity of conifers depend on species identity and inorganic nitrogen source
Gebauer Tobias, BassiriRad Hormoz
Environmental Pollution. 2011 159(12). p.3455
Sugarcane for water-limited environments. Variation in stomatal conductance and its genetic correlation with crop productivity
Basnayake J.,
Jackson P. A.,
Inman-Bamber N. G., Lakshmanan P.
Journal of Experimental Botany. 2015 66(13). p.3945
Hydraulic architecture of sugarcane in relation to patterns of water use during plant development*
MEINZER F. C.,
GOLDSTEIN G.,
NEUFELD H. S.,
GRANTZ D. A., CRISOSTO G. M.
Plant, Cell & Environment. 1992 15(4). p.471
Plant Stems (1995)
The use of tree root suckers to estimate root water potential
SIMONNEAU T., INRA R. HABIB
Plant, Cell & Environment. 1991 14(6). p.585
Water relations in sugarcane and response to water deficits
Inman-Bamber N.G., Smith D.M.
Field Crops Research. 2005 92(2-3). p.185
Black Locust Transpiration Responses to Soil Water Availability as Affected by Meteorological Factors and Soil Texture
WU Yuan-Zhi,
HUANG Ming-Bin, WARRINGTON David N.
Pedosphere. 2015 25(1). p.57
Response of the water status of soybean to changes in soil water potentials controlled by the water pressure in microporous tubes
STEINBERG S. L., HENNINGER D. L.
Plant, Cell & Environment. 1997 20(12). p.1506
Control of stomatal conductance and leaf rolling in O. sativa and O. glaberrima upland rice
Dingkuhn M,
Audebert A.Y,
Jones M.P,
Etienne K, Sow A
Field Crops Research. 1999 61(3). p.223
Growth and function of the sugarcane root system
Smith D.M.,
Inman-Bamber N.G., Thorburn P.J.
Field Crops Research. 2005 92(2-3). p.169
Limitation of plant water use by rhizosphere and xylem conductance: results from a model
Sperry J. S.,
Adler F. R.,
Campbell G. S., Comstock J. P.
Plant, Cell & Environment. 1998 21(4). p.347
Differences in hydraulic architecture account for near‐isohydric and anisohydric behaviour of two field‐grown Vitis vinifera L. cultivars during drought
SCHULTZ H. R.
Plant, Cell & Environment. 2003 26(8). p.1393
The response of sugarcane canopy development to water stress
Smit M.A., Singels A.
Field Crops Research. 2006 98(2-3). p.91
Sugarcane: Physiology, Biochemistry, and Functional Biology (2013)
Coordinated responses of plant hydraulic architecture with the reduction of stomatal conductance under elevated CO2 concentration
Hao Guang-You,
Holbrook N Michele,
Zwieniecki Maciej A,
Gutschick Vincent P,
BassiriRad Hormoz, Oren Ram
Tree Physiology. 2018 38(7). p.1041
Sugarcane: Physiology, Biochemistry, and Functional Biology (2013)
Sugarcane for water-limited environments: Theoretical assessment of suitable traits
Inman-Bamber N.G.,
Lakshmanan P., Park S.
Field Crops Research. 2012 134 p.95
Stomatal Responses of Plants in Drying Soil
Davies W.J., Meinzer F.C.
Biochemie und Physiologie der Pflanzen. 1990 186(5-6). p.357
Crop Adaptation to Climate Change (2011)
Carbon gain and hydraulic limits on water use differ between size classes of Larrea tridentata
Medeiros Juliana S., Pockman William T.
Journal of Arid Environments. 2010 74(10). p.1121
The ecological significance of long‐distance water transport: short‐term regulation, long‐term acclimation and the hydraulic costs of stature across plant life forms
MENCUCCINI M.
Plant, Cell & Environment. 2003 26(1). p.163
Genomic Designing for Abiotic Stress Resistant Technical Crops (2022)
Water transport in trees: current perspectives, new insights and some controversies
Meinzer Frederick C.,
Clearwater Michael J., Goldstein Guillermo
Environmental and Experimental Botany. 2001 45(3). p.239
