Challenges in the use of potential field data for studies of remote, deep-water frontier basins

Abstract

Given the sparsity of seismic data covering remote offshore frontier basins, Geoscience Australia?s studies of these areas rely heavily on gravity and magnetic data. These data complement 2D seismic reflection data by allowing interpretations to be extrapolated away from the generally widely-spaced seismic lines. However, interpreting potential-field data in frontier areas is challenging. Continuous gravity coverage is only available from satellite-altimetry-derived data, but the resolution of these data is often not sufficient for detailed geological interpretation and the data are subject to error in areas of shallow water or close to the coastline. Shipborne data provide higher-resolution data along track, but the sparsity of ship-tracks means that line levelling is difficult. Modelling gravity data to test seismic interpretations of sediment thickness is further complicated by poor constraints on the depth to the Moho. Efforts to understand frontier basins could be improved with better knowledge of the Moho (e.g. from seismic refraction data) and by better ship-track coverage. Extensive acquisition of airborne gravity and magnetic data over Australia?s margins would also provide better coverage and provide a seamless link between offshore and onshore areas.