Register      Login
ASEG Extended Abstracts ASEG Extended Abstracts Society
ASEG Extended Abstracts
RESEARCH ARTICLE

Information from geophysics for land management planning, Broomehill, Western Australia

Gregory J. Street, Simon Abbott, Marty Ladyman and Ann-Marie Anderson-Mayes

ASEG Extended Abstracts 2006(1) 1 - 7
Published: 2006

Abstract

In 1995 the SALTMAP airborne electromagnetic (AEM) system was surveyed over an area of around 50,000 hectares west of Broomehill in the southwest of Australia. It was the first practical application of a new AEM system developed specifically for mapping salinity. The project was a cooperative study between farmers in the area, World Geoscience Corporation, Department of Agriculture, Water and Rivers Corporation and the CRC-AMET. Previous AEM surveys in the southwest were surveyed using INPUT and QUESTEM but the results had not been incorporated into land management decisions. The aim of the Broomehill study was to develop the information products to enable farm plans to be created using information from the SALTMAP data. Inherent in the approach was the collection of a large range of ancillary geospatial data using geophysics, remote sensing and other techniques and incorporation of these data into a geographic database. Various techniques were explored to ensure that as much information as possible from the geophysics flowed through to the eventual land management plans. These techniques included manual interpretation of magnetic and radiometric data and the development of new smart data interpretation in GIS. Intermediate information sets such as `Salt Hazard' and regolith maps guided the development of new farm plans to address land degradation in the area. Ten years later the Broomehill study remains as one of the few cases where farm plans were created based on a full range of geospatial data. This paper will report on the methods used and how they could be improved with new interpretation techniques to define a new set of information that could be used to guide land management decisions today.

https://doi.org/10.1071/ASEG2006ab169

© ASEG 2006

Export Citation