Register      Login
Exploration Geophysics Exploration Geophysics Society
Journal of the Australian Society of Exploration Geophysicists
RESEARCH ARTICLE (Open Access)

The distortion tensor of magnetotellurics: a tutorial on some properties

Frederick E. M. Lilley
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations

Research School of Earth Sciences, Australian National University, Canberra, ACT 0200, Australia. Email: ted.lilley@anu.edu.au

Exploration Geophysics 47(2) 85-99 https://doi.org/10.1071/EG14093
Submitted: 29 September 2014  Accepted: 12 March 2015   Published: 1 May 2015

Journal Compilation © ASEG 2016

Abstract

A 2 × 2 matrix is introduced which relates the electric field at an observing site where geological distortion applies to the regional electric field, which is unaffected by the distortion. For the student of linear algebra this matrix provides a practical example with which to demonstrate the basic and important procedures of eigenvalue analysis and singular value decomposition.

The significance of the results can be visualised because the eigenvectors of such a telluric distortion matrix have a clear practical meaning, as do their eigenvalues. A Mohr diagram for the distortion matrix displays when real eigenvectors exist, and tells their magnitudes and directions.

The results of singular value decomposition (SVD) also have a clear practical meaning. These results too can be displayed on a Mohr diagram. Whereas real eigenvectors may or may not exist, SVD is always possible. The ratio of the two singular values of the matrix gives a condition number, useful to quantify distortion. Strong distortion causes the matrix to approach the condition known as ‘singularity’. A closely-related anisotropy number may also be useful, as it tells when a 2 × 2 matrix has a negative determinant by then having a value greater than unity.

Key words: distortion, eigenanalysis, magnetotelluric, Mohr, SVD, telluric.


References

Chakridi, R., Chouteau, M., and Mareschal, M., 1992, A simple technique for analyzing and partly removing galvanic distortion from the magnetotelluric impedance tensor: application to Abitibi and Kapuskasing data (Canada): Geophysical Journal International, 108, 917–929

Eggers, D. E., 1982, An eigenstate formulation of the magnetotelluric impedance tensor: Geophysics, 47, 1204–1214

Groom, R. W., and Bailey, R. C., 1989, Decomposition of magnetotelluric impedance tensors in the presence of local three-dimensional galvanic distortion: Journal of Geophysical Research, 94, 1913–1925

Groom, R. W., and Bailey, R. C., 1991, Analytical investigations of the effects of near surface three dimensional galvanic scatterers on MT tensor decomposition: Geophysics, 56, 496–518

Jones, A. G., 2012, Distortion of magnetotelluric data: its identification and removal, in A. D. Chave, and A. G. Jones, eds., The magnetotelluric method: theory and practice: Cambridge University Press, 219–302.

Korner, T. W., 1990, Fourier analysis: Cambridge University Press.

Larsen, J. C., 1975, Low-frequency (0.1-6.0 cpd) electromagnetic study of deep mantle electrical-conductivity beneath Hawaiian islands: Geophysical Journal of the Royal Astronomical Society, 43, 17–46

LaTorraca, G. A., Madden, T. R., and Korringa, J., 1986, An analysis of the magnetotelluric impedance for three-dimensional conductivity structures: Geophysics, 51, 1819–1829

Lilley, F. E. M., 1993, Magnetotelluric analysis using Mohr circles: Geophysics, 58, 1498–1506

Lilley, F. E. M., 1998, Magnetotelluric tensor decomposition: Part I, Theory for a basic procedure: Geophysics, 63, 1885–1897

Lilley, F. E. M., 2012, Magnetotelluric tensor decomposition: insights from linear algebra and Mohr diagrams, in H. S. Lim, ed., New achievements in geoscience: InTech Open Science, chap. 4, 81–106.

Press, W. H., Teukolsky, S. A., Vetterling, W. T., and Flannery, B. P., 1989, Numerical recipes: the art of scientific computing: Cambridge University Press.

Strang, G., 2005, Linear algebra and its applications (4th edition): Brooks–Cole.

Telford, W. M., Geldart, L. P., Sheriff, R. E., and Keys, D. A., 1976, Applied geophysics: Cambridge University Press.

Weidelt, P., and Chave, A. D., 2012, The magnetotelluric response function, in A. D. Chave, and A. G. Jones, eds., The magnetotelluric method: theory and practice: Cambridge University Press, 122–164.

Yee, E., and Paulson, K. V., 1987, The canonical decomposition and its relationship to other forms of magnetotelluric impedance tensor analysis: Journal of Geophysics, 61, 173–189