
TY  - JOUR
A1  - Lovibond, R. 
A1  - Rauch, M. 
T1  - AVO as an exploration tool in the Penola Trough, Otway Basin
JF  - Exploration Geophysics
JO  - Explor. Geophys.
Y1  - 1995
VL  - 26
IS  - 3
SP  - 448
EP  - 455
KW  - 
UR  - https://doi.org/10.1071/EG995448 
N2  - In 1988, Katnook-1 discovered gas in the basal Eumeralla Formation in the Penola Trough. All subsequent commercial discoveries have been within the underlying Crayfish Group. Amplitude-versus-offset (AVO) analysis performed on single gather records correctly predicted the subsequent discovery of gas within the Crayfish Group in the Katnook-2 and Ladbroke Grove-1 wells. Seismic recorded since 1990 has generally better quality data which are more suitable for AVO analysis. Two lines were recorded in 1993 over the Katnook Field, tied to the three Katnook wells. Only a small AVO effect was predicted at some locations from modelling using the well data, which was probably due to the poor quality well logs. The seismic AVO analysis, however, using all gather records, produced clear anomalies at both reservoir levels which approximately matched the predicted extent of the gas in the field from structural mapping. The subsequent Katnook-4 appraisal well confirmed the presence of gas at these levels, but unfortunately was not commercial. AVO and inversion were also run over the Haselgrove Gas Field prior to its discovery in 1994. AVO anomalies are seen at both Katnook reservoir levels, but the strong basal Eumeralla Formation anomaly is interpreted to be due to a clean, water saturated sand rather than gas. The anomalies at the top Pretty Hill Sandstone level are more consistent with structure although they extend below mapped closure. Subsequent reprocessing using pre-stack migration prior to AVO analysis produced anomalies which closely match the actual gas column height, and are within the zone of strong seismic amplitudes at this level. AVO anomalies in the area appear to be caused by both clean, water filled sands and the presence of hydrocarbons. Seismic inversion can help the prediction of sand quality variations, and the mapped extent of structural closure can be used to identify those AVO anomalies more likely to be related to hydrocarbons. Pre-stack time migration prior to AVO processing is essential in most cases. Unfortunately, AVO anomalies also occur in reservoirs with low gas saturations or low reservoir permeability. Despite these drawbacks AVO with inversion has proven to be a valuable exploration tool in the Penola Trough. No gas discoveries have yet been made which are not associated with an AVO anomaly. 
ER  -

